Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush vows action on Iran, Syria
the age ^ | January 11, 2007 | na

Posted on 01/11/2007 3:34:54 AM PST by Flavius

US President George W Bush has vowed to cut off Iranian and Syrian support to "terrorists" in Iraq in an aggressive warning that appeared to leave the door open to US strikes on the two countries.

As he unveiled his new strategy for the Iraq war, Bush accused Iran of supporting elements intent on attacking US troops in the war-torn country.

Success in Iraq was linked with success in stabilising the broader region, Bush said, adding: "This begins with addressing Iran and Syria."

"These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their territory to move in and out of Iraq. Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops," the president said in a national address aimed at selling his new Iraq strategy.

"We will disrupt the attacks on our forces. We will interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria.

"And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq."

Bush said he had ordered the deployment of an additional carrier strike group and Patriot anti-missile systems in the Middle East to beef up regional security and "reassure our friends and allies".

The US has rapidly upgraded the capability of the Patriot systems which provide air and missile defence following their relatively little success in the first Gulf War.

Washington is now trying to market the weapon to several Middle East nations increasingly worried about their security.

Citing countries such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and the Gulf States, Bush said they needed to understand that an American defeat in Iraq would "create a new sanctuary for extremists - and a strategic threat to their survival".

"These nations have a stake in a successful Iraq that is at peace with its neighbours - and they must step up their support for Iraq's unity government," he said.

"From Afghanistan to Lebanon to the Palestinian Territories, millions of ordinary people are sick of the violence, and want a future of peace and opportunity for their children.

"And they are looking at Iraq. They want to know: Will America withdraw and yield the future of that country to the extremists - or will we stand with the Iraqis who have made the choice for freedom?"

Bush said the US would work with others to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons and dominating the region, and it would help the governments of Turkey and Iraq resolve their border problems.

On Friday, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will leave for the Middle East to build support for Iraq, and continue "the urgent diplomacy" required to help bring peace to the region, he said.

"The challenge playing out across the broader Middle East is more than a military conflict," said the US president.

"It is the decisive ideological struggle of our time," he said, likening it to a fight between "those who believe in freedom and moderation" and "extremists who kill the innocent, and have declared their intention to destroy our way of life."

In the long run, he said, the most realistic way to protect the American people was to provide a "hopeful alternative to the hateful ideology of the enemy - by advancing liberty across a troubled region."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; syriana

1 posted on 01/11/2007 3:34:56 AM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Iraq has the same problem we do.

Open borders that allow criminals to walk right in.


2 posted on 01/11/2007 3:41:10 AM PST by airborne (What good is having air superiority if you don't use it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
The US has rapidly upgraded the capability of the Patriot systems which provide air and missile defence following their relatively little success in the first Gulf War.

Who wrote this article? IIRC, the Patriot had a great track record during Gulf War I.

3 posted on 01/11/2007 3:46:36 AM PST by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I hate the government-speak euphemism "extremist." I wish that he would have just called a spade a spade and said "Muslim terrorists."


4 posted on 01/11/2007 3:49:57 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"We will interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria."

It took Bush, and the pointy headed neo-cons, how many years to figure this out?

5 posted on 01/11/2007 4:00:26 AM PST by gitmogrunt (Conservative and Republican are not synonymous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmogrunt

They'd figured it out. They just had to get up the gumption to do something about it.


6 posted on 01/11/2007 4:02:02 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
You are correct that initial reports were glowing, and the Partriot certainly met with some noteworthy success. On further study of actual performance, it was obvious there was a lot of room for improvement, as the Pk was nowhere near what was expected.
7 posted on 01/11/2007 4:04:08 AM PST by Jacquerie (Democrats soil institutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gitmogrunt
It took Bush, and the pointy headed neo-cons, how many years to figure this out?

Heh heh....Bush has to step lightly around border issues. It's a touchy subject.
8 posted on 01/11/2007 4:10:08 AM PST by wgflyer (Liberalism is to society what HIV is to the immune system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Just heard that 5 Iranian Officials were caught in the Kurdistan region. If they let them go this time it's time for us to go until they kill themselves off then we'll go back in a take all the oil for reimbursement.


9 posted on 01/11/2007 4:11:26 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
On further study of actual performance, it was obvious there was a lot of room for improvement...


Am I wrong in thinking that Patriots were anti-aircraft missiles, being cross-trained to take on missiles at the time? I understand that Patriots performed quite well given their design parameters at the time, though too much was being expected of them then. The MSM was a worthless source of information during that war.
10 posted on 01/11/2007 4:15:29 AM PST by wgflyer (Liberalism is to society what HIV is to the immune system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gitmogrunt

I won't believe we're serious until I hear that there has be large explosions on the other side of the borders in question.
Everyone knows there are staging areas for all this flow of supplies and they should be one of first targets.


11 posted on 01/11/2007 4:22:57 AM PST by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
the Patriot had a great track record during Gulf War I

*ahem* - the track record was, as I recall, somewhat mediocre (but a lot better than nothing). but come on, that was the early 1990's...

the Patriot system is quite a different beast these days than it was *15 years* ago

what frosts me is the the MSM clowns are trying to equate the Patriot from those times to the Patriot system now... *quite* a difference in quality and performance.

12 posted on 01/11/2007 4:25:28 AM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

too little, too late


13 posted on 01/11/2007 4:34:33 AM PST by Samurai_Jack (ride out and confront the evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Only solution: Take off the gloves and REALLY release the dogs of war.


14 posted on 01/11/2007 4:36:04 AM PST by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper; Jacquerie
Thanks for the updated info. I haven't stayed current on ADA weaponry since I left the Army 20+ years ago.

I wouldn't recognize the short-range (SHORAD) systems of today. In my day, we had Redeye, Chaparral, and Stinger missiles.

As to faulty/uninformed reportage by the MSM, don't get me started...

15 posted on 01/11/2007 4:38:51 AM PST by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
The ONLY reason they do this stuff is because they think they can get away with it.

Look at what Nasrallah from Hezbollah said recently. He told his supports he never would have kidnapped the solders if he would have known Israel was going to respond with the intensity they did.

Iran isn't worried because they are convinced we are going to try and talk them to death. We'll lose the talking war. The people in the mid east talk and talk and talk and talk...

Donald Rumsfeld was right when he said weakness is very provocative!
16 posted on 01/11/2007 4:39:19 AM PST by SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wgflyer
"The MSM was a worthless source of information during that war."

As opposed to now?
17 posted on 01/11/2007 4:55:37 AM PST by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson