Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass. lawmakers advance proposed constitutional gay marriage ban
Boston.com ^

Posted on 01/02/2007 12:37:26 PM PST by shineon

BOSTON --Lawmakers in Massachusetts, the only state where gay marriage is legal, on Tuesday voted to advance a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, a critical step toward putting the measure the 2008 ballot.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: shineon

This isn't over yet folks. The legislatures are now trying to reconsider the question and the vote, and they are now trying to get a majority of pro-gay marriage legislatures to "twist enough arms" to get the next vote to be less than 50 legislatures who are for the '08 ballot question. If the next vote does end up taking place and not enough legislatures (less than 50 legislatures) for for the '08 ballot question, then the legislatures will say that they didn't break any laws and then go home!


21 posted on 01/02/2007 1:07:40 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProCivitas

Somehow...someway....they'll kill it.


22 posted on 01/02/2007 1:11:08 PM PST by Boston Blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ProCivitas
Someone said Romney would not sign for their pay raises unless they voted. I don't know if that is true.

Isaacson, who is head of teachers unions in MA, and head gay lobbyist, and her crew, have been pressuring the legislature NOT to vote, to let it die. So has Devil. According to Isaacson, if it goes to the ballot, they do not have the votes to keep it from passing.

I don't put it past the gays to prevent this amendment form going on the ballot. No matter what it takes.
23 posted on 01/02/2007 1:17:01 PM PST by gidget7 (2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: maryz; gidget7; HEY4QDEMS; raccoonradio; shineon

If the pro-family amendment survives this session, it's crucial that we analyze the districts carefully and do concerted grass-roots organizing in the 80 or more districts that are 'in play', where a representative that votes against traditional marriage can be dumped by the voters. It's especially important in since we're losing some pro-family reps from this last election. The degenerate lobby only prevails if our citizens remain disengaged.


24 posted on 01/02/2007 1:25:07 PM PST by ProCivitas (Each Nation Should Be Its Own Best Market First.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Just sayin

Ironically, the automatic pay raise comes from a Ballot Initiative Question, much like the one they have been violating the State Constitution to avoid voting on.


25 posted on 01/02/2007 1:36:45 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: shineon

Shhhh!!! There are Freepers on another thread that are trying to make the case that Romney actually supports gay marriage and his support of this constitutional amendment is phony. Careful, they might be introduced to reality!


26 posted on 01/02/2007 2:11:42 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shineon
I am quite surprised to hear this.


I still do not believe that us Massachusetts voters will be allowed to vote on this issue ever.

This matter is going to end up decided by a U.S. Constitutional Amendment.
27 posted on 01/02/2007 2:14:43 PM PST by Radix (Tag Line undergoing maintenance right now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette

Deval Patrick is governor now and he lobbied against this vote


28 posted on 01/02/2007 2:49:35 PM PST by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProCivitas

Senator Hedlund, where I am, is about the only Reagan-Republican left in the Senate. I don't think that there are many vulnerable libs anywhere. I don't know if it's the cannabis/college-crowdk, but Western/Central Mass that should be conservative is only marginally more so than the rest of the state.


29 posted on 01/02/2007 3:22:48 PM PST by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Radix
Unfortunately I think you are right. An amendment on the fed level reasserting the right of states to not be forced to recognize it, that is what is happening in MA.
30 posted on 01/02/2007 4:08:03 PM PST by gidget7 (2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: shineon

31 posted on 01/03/2007 3:30:59 AM PST by Silly (sarcasmoff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson