Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The real Issue at Duke
Townhall.com ^ | January 2, 2007 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 01/02/2007 9:04:32 AM PST by jazusamo

In the wake of recent bombshell revelations in the Duke University "rape" case, even some of District Attorney Michael Nifong's supporters have started backing away from him.

It was not just that the head of a DNA laboratory testified under oath in December that he and Nifong both knew back in April that there was no DNA from any of the Duke University lacrosse players found on the body of the stripper who accused them of rape -- or even that the DNA of other men were found in her underwear and in intimate areas of her body.

What was really damning was that he and Nifong had agreed to keep this fact secret, despite requirements that exculpatory evidence be turned over to the defense. Moreover, last May District Attorney Nifong filed a statement saying that the prosecution "is not aware of any additional material or information which may be exculpatory in nature."

But he already knew what the DNA evidence was before he signed that statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dukelax; dukerapecase; nifong; sowell; thomassowell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: VRWCmember

LOL! Didn't even notice!


21 posted on 01/02/2007 9:40:49 AM PST by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Excellent commentary - LIEfong's actions only seem 'inexplicable' to people who are naive enough (or dishonest enough) to pretend that he was pursuing truth, justice and the American Way..... if in fact he was opportunistically lynching these innocent young men in order to further his own sordid career then his actions are perfectly explicable -- and disgusting and despicable.....


22 posted on 01/02/2007 9:46:43 AM PST by Enchante (Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember; CaptRon

I was going to say an e but thought I'd wait. ;-)


23 posted on 01/02/2007 9:46:56 AM PST by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Who can these three young men sue to get back not only their reputations, but also years of their lives? For that matter, what about the Duke lacrosse coach and all the other players?

Nifong deserves some SERIOUS jail time!
24 posted on 01/02/2007 9:47:11 AM PST by RebelBanker (It is, however somewhat fuzzier on the subject of kneecaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
and disgusting and despicable.....

Agree and agree!

25 posted on 01/02/2007 9:49:44 AM PST by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

I agree........and I hope they sue the living sh*t out of the Duke and the chickensh*t president, at least the lowlife Nifong was doing it for a reason, however bad. The University just jumped on the wagon in the name of PC.


26 posted on 01/02/2007 10:54:01 AM PST by newcthem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

I can hardly wait for the black college to apologize for all the hate they handed out just after the horrible rape occurred.

I am absolutely certain that they will be tripping all over themselves to apologize for the fact that most white women are raped by black males.


27 posted on 01/02/2007 11:09:00 AM PST by 2ndClassCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Nifong's best defense against these charges, and the defense he'll undoubtedly use, is that everything he's done is in conformity with the current (feminist-based) theory and letter of rape law.

He can use as supporting evidence, that the Duke U president also followed the 'dictates' of such feminist law.

He would argue that, under such theory, he's effectively not allowed to use his personal discretion, the "prosecutorial discretion', to weed out false charges.

We have seen, for example, judges get hounded off the bench for using such discretion. Judges and prosecutors learn from such examples.

Wendy Murphy, the legal commentator / talking-head on various TV shows, is a perfect example of the feminist prosecutor thought process.
A. No corroboration is required to support a rape charge, merely an allegation.
B. Defendants are guilty until proven innocent.
C. Rape victims "never lie".
D. Rape victims should be able to win their cases without even having to face their accuser -- after all, that's tantamount to being 'raped again'.
E. The more sordid the rape victim's past and then-current behavior/profession is, the more important it is to make sure that the jury never hears anything about it.

Nifong merely has to say -- "those were the rules I followed".
28 posted on 01/02/2007 11:09:32 AM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
Wendy Murphy, the legal commentator / talking-head on various TV shows

I know exactly what you're saying and for the life of me I can't understand why she's given air time, she really lights my fire.

You're probably right about Nifong using that defense but he's got a steep mountain to climb, IMO. Everyone in the country is aware of his inappropriate actions and even some libs are coming down on him. We'll soon see.

29 posted on 01/02/2007 11:19:01 AM PST by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It's a good thing that Nifong is the only prosecutor who has ever done anything like this.


30 posted on 01/02/2007 11:20:41 AM PST by Montfort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

How about sueing the preacher who led his flock to the frat house in protest shouting about travisty of justice and how these rich white boys were getting special treatmenT?


31 posted on 01/02/2007 11:26:58 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
Everything you say makes sense, in its own terms. But then, the Duke Lacrosse team followed the rules, too. And they got punishment. Nifong is white, just like they are - why shouldn't he go to jail for being white?

32 posted on 01/02/2007 11:39:12 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

I am sick of hearing about this. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN A LOCAL ISSUE. its just as bad as making a big stink over a cat in tree. that being said I wish there was some way for the people in the district to remove mike nifong and charge him. Maybe the players can get some good lawyer and sue the pants off of mike nifong, but I think he should get jail time.


33 posted on 01/02/2007 11:56:28 AM PST by Kewlhand`tek (When you take things in backwards, everything comes out backwards.---Savage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Everyone in the country is aware of his inappropriate actions and even some libs are coming down on him. We'll soon see.

Yes, we shall see. Interesting that Libs are instinctively pro-defendant, except when those defendants are privileged whites. Whereas the Feminists are anti-men and will vigorously support any rape accuser.

So one should expect to see a split between the leftist coalition here, which is why you're now seeing CNN and others starting to support the players and attack Nifong.

And he's white and male, so maybe it all works out for them!

34 posted on 01/02/2007 1:14:42 PM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
In Nilfong's district, does anybody know the percentage of black people registered to vote compared to whites?
35 posted on 01/02/2007 2:15:30 PM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Hal

I have no idea what the percentage is, I've only read that they're a large part of the population.


36 posted on 01/02/2007 2:18:41 PM PST by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Now Nifong faced a tough election against a woman he had once fired and who would undoubtedly fire him if she became District Attorney.

In light of Mr. Nifong's perfidy, I believe the voters have every right to ask for a recall, and have a chance to vote for or against him with ALL of the information at hand.

37 posted on 01/02/2007 2:34:45 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

It's very doubtful Nifong will be around for another election. :-)


38 posted on 01/02/2007 2:36:34 PM PST by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Well it's obvious to me they wre getting special treatment.
Just not of the positive kind.


39 posted on 01/02/2007 2:37:10 PM PST by thile44 (Simplicity is too complex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Yes, it would. I have a feeling she's a real lady and doesn't want to stoop to his level.

I have a feeling Ms. Black was never approached by the media -- who have been notoriously incurious about the background of this case.

Indeed, Sowell is the reporter to acquaint me with several facts in the case: Nifong was originally appointed to the office to fill a vacancy and he was facing his first election...plus, there was animosity between him and the challenger.

Prior to today, the only thing I knew was that a.) an election was impending and b.) once it happened, it turned out to be close (which I thought rather surprising).

To the media, these were facts that were irrelevant to their agenda -- which had to do with demonizing "rich white boys".

40 posted on 01/02/2007 2:42:56 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson