Skip to comments.
Bush’s Fast-Track Confirmation Plan Continues: May Nominate Muslim U.N. Ambassador
MND ^
| December 10, 2006
| Doug Powers
Posted on 12/10/2006 3:34:23 PM PST by Nasty McPhilthy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Great dont fight for bolton, and nominate a muslim.
could someone tell me why I waited in line to vote last month?
To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
Death by a thousand cuts, but now the president is holding the knife.
3
posted on
12/10/2006 3:40:24 PM PST
by
navyguy
(We don't need more youth. What we need is a fountain of SMART.)
To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
This is a horror. Tell me that it is not true!
4
posted on
12/10/2006 3:41:40 PM PST
by
tessalu
To: tessalu
This isnt the first website I have seen this.
To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
You don't even know this guy, do you?
6
posted on
12/10/2006 3:42:51 PM PST
by
Hildy
("Death plucks my ear and says - LIVE - I am coming.....")
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Man, do we need another Reagan!!
I like GW, but he AND the rest of the pubbies need to "grow some" and kick butt.
7
posted on
12/10/2006 3:43:08 PM PST
by
GVNR
(Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.)
To: Hildy
Nope, but it is to risky to put a muslim as an ambassador to an already anti semetic organization. I dont want to take the chance he is the least bit sympathetic to the "plight" of the pali's.
Do you trust a muslim is going to have the cajones to sit in the well of the U.N. security council and hammer these third world tin pot dicators.
While it would be refreshing, I doubt it would happen and dont want to risk it.
To: Hildy
um...a fan of Zbigniew Brzezinski ?
9
posted on
12/10/2006 3:54:43 PM PST
by
stylin19a
("Klaatu Barada Nikto")
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Khalilzad (currently US Ambassador in Iraq) is a good guy. I don't care whether he is Afghani by birth or not. He wouldn't be the worst choice. I have no problem at all with Khalilzad...
To: navyguy
The longer Bush is in office, the less I like him.
Any guesses as to how long it will be before he teams with Ms. Nancy to pass the "comprehensive immigration" bill?
11
posted on
12/10/2006 4:05:55 PM PST
by
BW2221
To: SolidWood
Just what would you have a problem with?
12
posted on
12/10/2006 4:13:57 PM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(BUAIDH NO BAS)
To: BW2221
To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
Khalizad is our Ambassador to Iraq and before it was our Ambassador to Afghanistan. He's a strong conservative and supporter of the President's foreign policy.
14
posted on
12/10/2006 4:16:30 PM PST
by
Accygirl
To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
the Bolton card was played to the end - the votes aren't there, that's it. what do you want Bush to do, hold a gun to Chaffee's head during the vote?
I don't know enough about this new guy to comment.
To: Nasty McPhilthy; All
FYI: Zalmay Khalilzad is regarded by ALL informed conservatives (vs reactionary bigots like several of the posters on this thread) as BEYOND Bolton-esque.
Many regard what Zalmay has been able to accomplish in Afghanistan and Iraq (re: constitutions/elections) as absolutely miraculous! He would be a PHENOMENAL ambassador to the UN . . . and Bolton would be the first to endorse his nomination!
16
posted on
12/10/2006 4:19:48 PM PST
by
DrDeb
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Sorry, but I don't get your question...
But for what it is worth: I have a problem with defeatist, isolationist, liberal/socialist, terrorist-loving antisemites (in general and particularly in politics and power-positions).
Khalilzad is neither of them...
He is no observant Muslim at all (AFAIK) and obviously no Islamofascist. He has done good work in Iraq as our ambassador, so I fail to see the problem...
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Whom do you want Bush to nominate? I think that he should nominate Sen. George Allen. He's a conservative member of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee. He was a U.S. rep. and governor.
To: oceanview
The Nuclear option would have been nice! It also would have been a shot in the arm to the base. Bolton had 58 votes. and the dems did what they have done for 6 years obstruct.
To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
there is no nuclear option on committee.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson