The arrogance of the Democrats is only exceeded by their hatred for America and freedom.
Dear Senator Reid which of the recommendations should we institute?
Thanks for the good news Harry .. I feel much better knowing he upsets you
President Bush was elected by the people of the United States to serve as the Commander in Chief, not Reid, and certainly no "study group."
I wish that was true.
But unfortunately, the phrase "Stay The Course" is not interpreted, "We will bring our soldiers home as soon as we finish the job."
Someone has got to get a message to Reid that he doesn't sit behind the desk in the oval office.
This ignorant punk Reid is pissed off because the president won't roll over and play dead.
It's your ball now libs. Cut the troop funding if you don't like things.
There may well be significant changes... but not until January 20, 2009.
He is tepid in what he talks about doing
I believe it was said about Lincoln he was either firmly weak in his support of any given legislation or weakly firm.
Its not a good idea to plan your future from advise from a nursing home.
THE ISG IS AN ATTEMPTED COUP.
It appears the coup has failed and Reid and Pelosi are very disappointed.
It seems the elitists are upset their worldview is not being obeyed. (you will obey my Authooooreeeh teeeee!!!)
I REALLY HOPE GWBUSH SAYS "SURRENDER IS NOT AN OPTION." in his upcomming speech. If he says that word for word, it turns the cut and run democrats into surrender monkeys.
Reid to Bush: Why aren't you putting us at the mercy of Iran and Syria and begging them not to hurt us?
How 'bout it Dingy Harry...lets cut and run and fight this war on terror in the Rockford Mall. Its a much cleaner place and easier to reach. You idiot!
Maybe this is a hopeful sign that Bush will finally get rid of the stupid "New Tone" and start being the stubborn hard-ass again we all love & cherish.
"He is tepid in what he talks about doing."
Being tepid about ISG tepidity is no vice, Harry.
Well said.
I wish the President would take this further. I wish he would have told the study group he ain't talking to Iran one on one and to forget it as that recommendation is DOA. What the heck does the President and the Republicans have to lose now I ask? What?
It must be frustrating for the democrats and media not to be the president of the United States. Its still an awful reality check for them.
The Iraq Study Group was not elected by the people to conduct foreign policy and defend the United States of America. Harry Reid was elected to represent Nevada and not to guide the foreign policy of the United States. The main stream media needs to be reminded that George W Bush is the president and that he has the authority of the executive branch of government vested to him by the constitution.
Why Sen Reid you're the Senate majority leader. Why didn't you tell him?
Despite any reservationsdabout President Bush and illegal immigration etc, he is now about the only thing standing between us and an abject Democrat surrender in the War on Terror.
Are the Dems going to use the report as an excuse to move forward on impeachment? "The President won't listen to the ISG! We must impeach him!"
To most people a compromise is an agreement. Two or more parties sit down and they each give up something for a greater agreement. Thus they end up with a part of what they want but not all of it. The misery/goodness is spread equally.
Enter the Baker Report. It's been out two days and the left is celebrating. I haven't seen them this happy since the election of Bill Clinton and the Democrat Congress. Katie Couric was almost wetting her panties the other night in excitement. Lefty bloggers are going crazy with happiness.
Thus I'm wondering what they gave up in the Baker Report. It was a 'compromise' right? So what did the left give up? We all know that if they had given up something that's all we'd be hearing about in the unbiased MSM is how 'unreasonable' it was.
A better question is what did we get out of it? I would expect that 39 of the 79 articles in the report would be things that I (as a conservative) agree with. So how come I have yet to see anything I like? Why are conservative pundits oddly silent?
Cause we haven't gotten crap. We didn't get anything out of this "compromise" accept ignored. The people who were supposed to represent our side gave up our principles and sold us out. This was more of an embarrassing surrender than a compromise. If both sides are supposed to get something, why aren't I happy?
Get ready for tons of gleeful talk of 'compromise' from the left. They'll tell us that now that we all agree, we go forward from here. The fact that this was a RECOMMENDATION will quickly be forgotten. The fact that we *don't* agree will be ignored. It will become the only way to handle the war in Iraq from here on in (since it mandates the liberal way of doing things.)
Thus from this point in, conservatives will be viewed as the enemy by the political powers that be. Smug liberal political elitists will be quick to remind us that "now that we all agree" the only discussion left is how to implement their ideas.
This stupid Commission was brought to us by a Republican Congress who was supposed to be fighting for our values. The only upshot is that these idiots won't be there to betray us next year.