Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Physicists Find Tiny Particle With No Charge, Very Low Mass And Sub-nanosecond Lifetime
ScienceDaily ^ | December 7, 2006

Posted on 12/07/2006 6:00:02 PM PST by annie laurie

After decades of intensive effort by both experimental and theoretical physicists worldwide, a tiny particle with no charge, a very low mass and a lifetime much shorter than a nanosecond, dubbed the "axion," has now been detected by the University at Buffalo physicist who first suggested its existence in a little-read paper as early as 1974.

The finding caps nearly three decades of research both by Piyare Jain, Ph.D., UB professor emeritus in the Department of Physics and lead investigator on the research, who works independently -- an anomaly in the field -- and by large groups of well-funded physicists who have, for three decades, unsuccessfully sought the recreation and detection of axions in the laboratory, using high-energy particle accelerators.

The paper, posted online in the British Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, will be published in the January 2007 issue.

Results first were presented during a two-day symposium held in October at UB that celebrated Jain's 50-year career in the physics department in the College of Arts and Sciences.

During that symposium, the world-renowned and Nobel Prize-winning scientists in attendance expressed astonishment and delight that the axion finally might have been found.

The axion has been seen as critical to the Standard Model of Physics and is believed to be a component of much of the dark matter in the universe.

"These results show that we have detected axions, part of a family of particles that likely also includes the very heavy Higgs-Boson particle, which at present is being sought after at different laboratories," said Jain.

The story of the search for the axion particle in high-energy physics -- not to be confused with the search by cosmologists and astrophysicists for axions produced by the sun -- reads almost like a novel, with veritable armies of physicists committing many years of research and passion to its discovery starting in the 1970s.

In 1977, theoretical physicists predicted that there should exist a particle with characteristics very similar to those described in Jain's papers; in that publication, the term "axion" was coined. After that theoretical work, there was a mushrooming of papers from both theoretical and experimental physicists all chasing the axion using low-, medium- and high-energy accelerator beams from different laboratories worldwide.

But when it proved to be too elusive, many in the physics community then abandoned the search in the 1990s, based on puzzling evidence that perhaps this tantalizing particle didn't exist after all. Some groups flatly denied its existence and began referring to it as a "phantom."

Jain's initial interest in the elusive particles originated with work he began publishing in 1974 in Physical Review Letters and other journals that demonstrated evidence for particles with very low mass and very short lifetimes during particle accelerator experiments he conducted at Fermilab and Brookhaven National Laboratory.

At the time, Jain's papers elicited little interest from other physicists.

"This particle was there in my original paper in 1974," he said. "The experiment gave a hint that these particles existed but did not generate sufficient statistics to prove it. I knew I had to wait until a heavy ion beam at very high energy was available at a new accelerator."

As recently as 1999, a project called the CERES experiment at CERN in Geneva again focused on attempting to detect the axion, but that project also was unsuccessful.

The problem, according to Jain, was with their detector, which was electronic, the standard used in high-energy physics experiments today.

"They didn't know how to handle the detector for short-lived particles," Jain said. "I knew that for this very short-lived particle -- 10 to the power minus 13 seconds -- the detector must be placed very near the interaction point where the collision between the projectile beam and the target takes place so that the produced particle doesn't run away too far; if it does, it will decay quickly and it will be completely missed. That is what happened in most of the unsuccessful experiments."

Instead, Jain used a visual detector, made of three-dimensional photographic emulsions, which act as both target and detector and that therefore can detect very short-lived particles, such as the axion. However, use of such a detector is so specialized that to be successful, it requires intensive training and experience.

In the 1950s, Jain was trained to use this type of detector by its developer, the Nobel laureate, British physicist Cecil F. Powell. Jain has used it throughout his career to successfully detect other exotic phenomena, such as the charm particle, the anomalon, the quark-gluon plasma and the nuclear collective flow. In Jain's successful experiment, the axions were produced under extreme conditions of high temperature and high pressure, using a heavy ion lead beam with a total energy of 25 trillion electron volts at CERN in Geneva.

His experiments generated 1,220 electron pairs with identified vertices, the origin of each pair. They peaked at a distance of just 200-300 microns from the interaction point where the collisions take place in the emulsion.

"Only at that very short distance did I find the peak signal of this very-low-mass, short-lived particle with a neutral charge," he said.

After they are produced, axions rapidly decay into two electron pairs, the electron and the positron, he explained.

"We identified each vertex for each electron pair and we would not accept any electron pair unless we knew its vertex," he said. "There was a congestion of all kinds of low mass particles, including axions, near the detector. The background has to be filtered out from this congestion in order to obtain the signal of the axion."

Jain's co-author on the paper is Gurmukh Singh, then a post-doctoral researcher at UB and now a visiting assistant professor in the Department of Computer and Information Sciences at the State University of New York at Fredonia.

During Jain's long and illustrious career at UB, he published 175 scientific papers on a wide variety of physics topics, ranging from cosmic ray research performed on balloon flights to National Institutes of Health-funded studies on bone tissue to find more effective cancer therapies.

"After half a century as a scientist at UB, I find that with the discovery of this axion, my mission is complete," he concluded.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: axion; buffalo; darkmatter; higgsboson; particle; physics; science; universityatbuffalo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: annie laurie
Interesting. Finding this particle confirms the axion field exists. It's a field proposed to explain why CP symmetry is not observed to be broken in strong interactions. It closes another loose end in the Standard Model.
61 posted on 12/07/2006 10:47:51 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie
The headline says "sub-nanosecond" and the body of the article says ten to the minus 13th seconds. That's a tenth of a picosecond.

If the particle is flying at the speed of light, it'll only go 30 microns, or a 33rd of a millimeter, before it decays.

Interestingly, that's the same order of the thickess of a film emulsion, so by stacking films (with very thin backings), they can get a 3-D view of the process.

62 posted on 12/08/2006 12:24:19 AM PST by Erasmus (Go to Sebastopol and Crimea River.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
It's weight would equal the mass of an electron, a positron and whatever energy is given off when it decays. I think.....
63 posted on 12/08/2006 12:51:57 AM PST by alpo (Allright.... Who fatwa'd?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: alpo

You guessed in the wrong direction methinks.


64 posted on 12/08/2006 12:59:45 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: alpo

Lighter...


65 posted on 12/08/2006 1:12:22 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

"After they are produced axions rapidly decay into 2 electron pairs, an electron and a positron."

Seems like axions have enough mass to form the 2 particles and some energy is usually given off during decay. Unless the decomposition is endothermic but the decay apperars to go from high enery to lower energy particles. Thats why a super collider is needed to make them.


66 posted on 12/08/2006 1:32:05 AM PST by alpo (Allright.... Who fatwa'd?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: alpo

Where is your BS meter at right now concerning this article?


67 posted on 12/08/2006 1:34:20 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: alpo
Here's a hint, electron and positrons are what is known as matter and antimatter. They annihilate each other exactly as Relativity predicts. They exist due to to Heisenberg's principle. Is your BS meter going off yet?
68 posted on 12/08/2006 1:45:16 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: alpo

If you think your BS meter is going off from me please tell me.


69 posted on 12/08/2006 1:50:35 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Loudly


70 posted on 12/08/2006 1:50:37 AM PST by alpo (Allright.... Who fatwa'd?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: alpo
Which post# is the question. Electron - Positron pairs form/annihilate continuously.
71 posted on 12/08/2006 2:11:53 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie
Instead of trying to explain these phantoms as 'particles' they need to start treating us like adults and use modern terms like strings and branes.

We can handle the math.


BUMP

72 posted on 12/08/2006 2:28:15 AM PST by capitalist229 (Get Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

bookmark for later


73 posted on 12/08/2006 2:32:36 AM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

are they going to name it after britney spears?


74 posted on 12/08/2006 2:36:20 AM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Once again, they use the language of metaphysical certainty while using the tools of rough guessing. I really don't mind that they flail like this, but wouldn't it be nice if they'd admit they're sailing without a map, not knowing what the hell they're doing, that any idiot who can tie his own shoes could do almost as well.

That's all I want.


75 posted on 12/08/2006 10:39:38 AM PST by AmishDude (I coined "Senator Ass" to describe Jim Webb. He may have already used it as a character in a novel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
I really don't mind that they flail like this, but wouldn't it be nice if they'd admit they're sailing without a map, not knowing what the hell they're doing, that any idiot who can tie his own shoes could do almost as well.

Because that would be a lie.

76 posted on 12/08/2006 10:50:25 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: alpo; kinoxi
"Seems like axions have enough mass to form the 2 particles and some energy is usually given off during decay. Unless the decomposition is endothermic but the decay apperars to go from high enery to lower energy particles."

The mass of the axion is between 10-3 and 10-6 eV. That's very small. All the energy is contained essentially in the momentum of the particle.

E = p*c.

Thermodynamics isn't important here. The energy of the particle before the decay equals the E after the decay. The momentum of the tiny mass is turned into a particle pair. It's the reletivistic mass which is is important here. The speed is very close to the speed of light so the mass is 106 to 109 times higher.

77 posted on 12/08/2006 11:12:22 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: spunkets; alpo

The energy of the pair is over 1.02 MeV.


78 posted on 12/08/2006 11:17:18 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
ooops... The mass is 109 to 1012 times higher.
79 posted on 12/08/2006 2:34:11 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2
If physicists weren't obsessed with with the rediculously large or the rediculously small so much of the time, more people might show some interest in physics.

Spell check is your friend when criticizing academicians.

80 posted on 12/08/2006 3:52:25 PM PST by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson