Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD; Iraq Study Group Releases Report
December 6, 2006

Posted on 12/06/2006 8:02:58 AM PST by Howlin

Live on cable now...


TOPICS: Breaking News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1938; bakerreport; chickenlittlemagnet; iraq; iraqsurrendergroup; neville; sellout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 841-854 next last
To: Cold Heat; Txsleuth
The report is little more than a attempt to bring consensus, and should not be viewed as anything more.

A fatally flawed consensus, however momentarily comforting, but which eases us down a path that leads to our ultimate destruction, is not something to be desired. This report, and the insane partisan propaganda-driven process which produced it, is such a "consensus".

681 posted on 12/06/2006 10:36:53 AM PST by tarheelswamprat (So what if I'm not rich? So what if I'm not one of the beautiful people? At least I'm not smart...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

I'll use my copy to line the bird cage.


682 posted on 12/06/2006 10:39:17 AM PST by My2Cents (Scrape the Bottom. Vote for Rodham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
Did you not hear O'Connor?

She just declared it ok to do a partial birth abortion on Iraq and the War on Terror.

That's a brutally descriptive and effective way of putting it. You should email that to Rush.

683 posted on 12/06/2006 10:40:54 AM PST by tarheelswamprat (So what if I'm not rich? So what if I'm not one of the beautiful people? At least I'm not smart...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

The report calls for a full US withdrawal by the 1st quarter of 2008. Cut and run is the new US policy. And remember, incoming SecDef Gates was on the ISG.


684 posted on 12/06/2006 10:41:30 AM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunny Gene

"That seems to be our "leaders" primary concern these days when dealing with the psychopaths in the Middle East and elsewhere."

Don't it just break your heart? It makes me sick. I'm just done reading a few books about the early period of American Independence. They revealed in detail what the word "American" and "leader" used to mean: brave, principled, truthful, independent, fierce against foes, a trusted friend, self reliant, honorable, dutiful, loyal, willing to make sacrifices for freedom and his fellows, unyielding in the cause of liberty. How we have fallen!

Now we have Jesse Jackson, Britney Spears, Rap music, Hollywood and all the cowards, curs and traitors in the media, academia and government stifling these great values and replacing them with dishonor and every form of degradation. I'm not the crying type, but I feel like weeping over this state of things today of all days when I see that report and how it is received and trumpeted as a great occassion for the enemies of America.


685 posted on 12/06/2006 10:42:12 AM PST by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat

It is only destructive if President Bush DOES what they suggest in this report...

From what I have seen, he won't.


686 posted on 12/06/2006 10:46:48 AM PST by Txsleuth (Bolton/Cheney (that would be Lynne) 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate
What national interest is served by such disclosures?

Well, if you are an aging ex-hippie who wishes to relive your glory days of vitenam protests, a time you felt most relevant in the world because your shouts and curses actually led to the humiliation of this nation, then it means everything. It means you're still able to shout down the nation, support "social justice" around the planet, yadda yadda yadda. Of course that means the prostration of the US before it's enemies, but hey, we earned it, right?

The most selfish, shallow group of people ever. Unable to see past their own self interest (in this case, their need to feel important and to "make a difference") this group of jerks has risen to traditional power in politics and in the media and they are once again thrilled to see the US humiliated. The difference is that with our ill-conceived hasty withdrawl from Vietnam only led to millions of deaths of those other people way over there, this time it will certainly lead to chaos and death on our own shores eventually. But as lunch as Pinch Sulzberger feels good about himself, that's all that matters.

If they have their way, our soldiers will sneak out in the middle of the night, heads hanging, while massacres happen in Iraq (so they can say "See! Look what we caused!" And yes, I do beleive they take a smug satisfaction is seeing chaos and death when it justifies their world view) It's up to the President to prevent that, and find a way to maintain both our dignity and our national interests. I sincerely hope his recent proclivity to go-along to get-along doesnt come into play this time.

687 posted on 12/06/2006 10:48:33 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat
You will now see them [Dims] try to gracefully reverse some of their political election positions on the war, and this report will help them do this.

The Rats' treatment of Gates at yesterday's confirmation hearing leads me to suspicion that the Left senses that America, although not supporting aggressive tactics in the WOT, does not at present want a pullout from Iraq.

Yesterday on the live confirmation hearing thread, I posted that the Dims seemed to be positioning themselves for a takeover of the Iraq campaign. They would, as I stated in my post yesterday, dearly love to take credit for pulling our chestnuts out of the Iraqi fire; co-opting Bush's tactics while destroying him and the Pub's 2008 chances would certainly be a delight for them.
688 posted on 12/06/2006 10:49:06 AM PST by PerConPat (A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; dirtboy; A. Pole; Paul Ross; hedgetrimmer
YOU SAID....."Not just an arabist. As I occasionally note on middle east threads, while heading the commission Baker kept his day job, senior partner at Baker Botts, with substantial financial interests in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States."

This report is a sham IMHO...because no mention has been made of the basic premise of American policy...which to my mind is very simple...

What we do as a nation should be in the long term best interests of America, and the American people ...in regards to

SECURITY...SOVEREIGNTY...PROSPERITY

Its so simple. IMHO, allowing Iraq to degenerate into another Lebanon, or some sort of sectarian violence prone Iranian puppet theocracy, with Al Sadyr and his Hezbollah militia enablers left intact, would be an unmitigated NATIONAL SECURITY disaster for this country long term...and a complete repudiation of the Bush doctrine on the WOT as articulated in his FIRST TERM.

Obviously, we need to start kicking some serious ass over there...starting with the militias and Sadyr. Sadly...the reasonable approach articulated here will not allow us to do what needs to be done over there. Can we WIN??..depends on your defintion of wIN...but we sure need to give it our best shot. But wait...somebody over in the ME wont 'like' it....So, we'll retreat...but gradually...in a 'reasonable' bipartisan consenus stage managed way of course.

But Im not particularly surprised by this Commission, or this report. Thats why Im not shaking my fist at the TV. Its the same old...same old...

Has it ever occurred to folks that the reason these particular people are on this Commission is PRECISELY because of their large MULTINATIONAL SPECIAL INTEREST and LOBBYIST CONNECTIONS???

Baker is King of the Saudi special interests group...but he has alot of competition for the title around DC..on both sides of the aisle of course.

Its time to start connecting the dots here folks.

Ive said it before...Its all about a government of, by and for.....

SPECIAL WELL FINANCED, WELL CONNECTED INTERESTS

And apparently, these particular special interests want a stage managed Iraqi withdrawal...made to look like a reasonable bipartisan consensus. With a bunch of other Saudi approved goodies thrown in for good measure.

Its all so 'reasonable' you see...just like the 9-11 Commission investigative report. Lee Hamilton, with his international connections was on that one too...eh??

Vernon Jordan (LOL, give me a fck'n break guys).....designer suits..K Street power lunches...and lots of nubile DC wenches in tow...oh boy...oh boy!!!

Lets not make waves here people...the K Street crowd dont appreciate it.

When something gets in the way of these 'big shot' bipartisan K Street financed love fests...like Able Danger...well, you know the rest...
689 posted on 12/06/2006 10:49:08 AM PST by Dat Mon (9-11 Commission...Able Danger Coverup...Iraq Study Commission...whats up next guys?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat
That's a brutally descriptive and effective way of putting it. You should email that to Rush.

Thanks.

I just sent it now.

690 posted on 12/06/2006 10:51:09 AM PST by NeoCaveman (I support our troops when they open fire on our journalists (and all other times too, of course))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 683 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Pepsi, you are 100% right on this.

(except, diet coke is better)


691 posted on 12/06/2006 10:52:31 AM PST by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
For us, it was presented in a way that was not very appealing, and seemed partisan and disrespectful to the office of president in a way.

But that is not who is the target of the report.

We know what the stakes are. We know who the players are.

The problem is that Joe Blow citizen has had their skull filled with media lies to win the last election and Iraq was a part of the list of lies. The report was designed to be hated by both the left and the right, it was aimed at the center and will perform a informational job to bring them into the decision process.

Bush has tried his best to do this, but his words, and now his reputation have been sullied. The masses of faceless people have been told we are losing Iraq and that the soldiers are dying for nothing. They believe it.

This report is a attempt to bring them back into the process, and should not be viewed by us as some sort of new attempt to undermine the president. He can use this to renew support, or at least buy some public patience as the situation in Iraq works it's self out in the fullness of time..

Time is what we need, and bush is being threatened by Congress who have control of the purse. We need a couple more years to show results.

If we don't get those years and that support, the damage done will be incalculable.

Bush knows that historians will be the ones to correct his record, so right now, his present reputation is not the issue. Success in Iraq is. he will do the things necessary to be successful and he needs time and congressional support of the troops to do it. Nothing else matters.

This report is a attempt to smooth feathers and get that support for a couple of years.

692 posted on 12/06/2006 10:53:15 AM PST by Cold Heat (We blew it..... So back to work we go........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

Well, to me joking and laughing while presenting this report will send a mixed message to the public.


693 posted on 12/06/2006 10:55:23 AM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, thank you for Mozart Lover's son's safe return, and look after Jemian's son, please!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 692 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon
like Able Danger...well, you know the rest...

Yup, where's Curt Welding today?

694 posted on 12/06/2006 10:57:00 AM PST by processing please hold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Soldier

" He ought to go in there and kick ass .."

If I had a nickel for every person who has said this to me...most of them military and veterans of Iraq.
Something happened to President Bush this second term.
It's like the fight has been beaten out of him by the media and the Democrats. Beyond the normal wear and tear of the office, especially post 9/11.
He's very cautious in his words now and seems to pull a lot of punches.
No more Bring It On or Wanted Dead or Alive or appearances at the WTC rubble with the bullhorn.
VP Cheney still seems to maintained his attitude ,though. Too bad he's ruled out 08.


695 posted on 12/06/2006 10:58:52 AM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat; Mo1
But there really was no change, and the Bush policies will have more support as a result.

I think this was all intentional.

Of course it was intentional - that doesn't prevent it from being delusional as well.

The flaw in your reasoning is that this isn't happeneing in a vacuum - the whole world is watching, especially those who wish to destroy us. No matter how endlessly we prattle on about consensus and bi-partisanship, the only thing they will hear is that America is indeed, as Osama said, a paper tiger, as that we lack the will to oppose them over the long run. That IS the message we are currently broadcasting to the whole world, and it's being heard loud and clear.

696 posted on 12/06/2006 10:59:27 AM PST by tarheelswamprat (So what if I'm not rich? So what if I'm not one of the beautiful people? At least I'm not smart...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon
Its so simple. IMHO, allowing Iraq to degenerate into another Lebanon, or some sort of sectarian violence prone Iranian puppet theocracy, with Al Sadyr and his Hezbollah militia enablers left intact, would be an unmitigated NATIONAL SECURITY disaster for this country long term...and a complete repudiation of the Bush doctrine on the WOT as articulated in his FIRST TERM.

That's true, an Iranian dominated Persian Gulf will present grave risks, particularly from a nuclear Iran.

697 posted on 12/06/2006 10:59:54 AM PST by SJackson (A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user, T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
I'm going to be on Larry King Live tonight to give one side of a Military Families perspective on this tonight. If you have someone serving in Iraq just let me know what you think.
698 posted on 12/06/2006 11:04:46 AM PST by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: norton
'Diplomacy' toward Syria and Iran should, in my version, concentrate on the many reasons they'd be better off not interfering.

What reasons are those? Every time I turn around, it seems, someone is yelling, "Negotiate with Iran and Syria!" But as yet no one can tell me how we are going to get them to stop meddling in Iraq. It's either carrots or sticks. We have tried carrots. If we pull out troops what sticks do we have?

699 posted on 12/06/2006 11:13:23 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20865953-2703,00.html

"A photo-shoot last week of the co-chairmen by celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz for Men's Vogue magazine, when the group was supposed to be hammering out its conclusions, has been greeted with much amusement."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And, more background .. the landscape seems to be changing, and Frontpage was apparently trumpeting the possibilities:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=24861

"Regarded against this background, reports that Baker regularly consults with President Bush about “policy and personnel” and meets with his national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, take on an added significance. It’s too early to tell whether the Nixon-Kissinger era of détente is newly ascendant in Washington, but with the war in Iraq going poorly and the polls routinely unkind, the temptation to recant the sound principles of the War on Terror and forge a separate peace with terrorists and their state sponsors may seem seductive.


By backing Rumsfeld, President Bush has shown his willingness to defy the prescriptions of the James Baker wing of the Republican Party. Now, as the pressure mounts to accept Baker’s “sensible” advice, one can only hope that the president is as stubborn as his detractors claim."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Kristol's article on the report

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/12/06/opinion/main2233295.shtml


700 posted on 12/06/2006 11:13:39 AM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 841-854 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson