Posted on 11/30/2006 9:46:43 PM PST by neverdem
When our first son developed asthma as a 3-year-old, my husband and I felt pretty much blindsided. We were only a little less shocked when the same thing happened to our second son, at the same age.
The disease turned out to be tenacious, and for years both boys needed inhalers or a nebulizer machine several times a day to prevent asthma attacks that could keep them up half the night, coughing and wheezing.
Both had eczema, too, and the kind of food allergies to nuts, peanuts and shellfish that can lead to fatal reactions.
What caused all this? My husband and I were mystified, because neither of us had asthma or life-threatening allergies, nor did our parents or siblings. I do have hay fever and allergies to cats and dogs, but I had always considered my symptoms just a nuisance not a bad omen for the next generation. My husband isnt allergic to anything.
But we seem to have been caught on a rising tide that no one fully understands. Our sons were born in 1984 and 1987, and we encountered an awful lot of children their ages who had the same illnesses, far more than we remembered from our own generation.
Statistics suggest that something strange was occurring in those years. From 1980 to 2003, the prevalence of asthma in children rose to 5.8 percent from 3.6 percent, an increase of about 60 percent, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Other estimates from the disease centers show an even bigger increase in the asthmas rates for younger children: a 160 percent jump in those younger than 5 from 1980 to 1994. But changes in data collection starting in 1997 make it hard to compare the figures before and after that year.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
And this is probably a good example of the parameters of the discussion.
Global warming? ;)
Maybe a lot of those cases are what would now be described as exercise induced asthma. I wonder how many of those folks still kept engaging in vigorous activities as they aged?
I guess why that's why there is wheezing, shortness of breath, deoxygenated blood, elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the blood and a decreased forced expiratory volume over time. Measuring deoxygenated blood, elevated pCO2 and blood pH requires sticking a needle into an artery to confirm the respiratory acidosis. They like to use pulse oximetry as a substitute.
There used to be a site calles "oxybusters.com" that chronicled the rise in asthma to the use of MTBE. I think that was the cause.
My husband and I have asthma, and I can tell you we were not born in 1984 or 1987.
There used to be site called "oxybusters.com" that had detailed information about the effects of MTBE. I am not saying MTBE is the only reason for a rise in astma but it sure caused a lot of problems.
My brother is 38, he had childhood asthma, it never slowed him down. Inhalers, allergy shots the whole nine yards. He played sports through college, and still runs. The allergist said even though back then it wasn't recommended, the fact that he was so active, in spite of the asthma, helped him in the long run.
I agree with that theory. I read somewhere that the immune system is like a muscle: it needs exercise to maintain its integrity. Now that may be an old wives' tale but who knows? The problem today though is separating factors that might cause asthma from factors that merely parallel it (there's a technical word for that but it's too early in the morning for my brain to kick in, especially on Fridays when I am mentally incompetent pretty much all day).
Is it pollution, lack of pollution, MTBE, cigarette smoke, too much emphasis on antibiotics and cold medicine, genetics, hyper-hygiene, on and on? Some of those factors could be a cause, some just happening at the same time. Asthma is a real disease as I know from my husband's experience. I only point anecdotally to my own experience in saying that at least three diagnosed cases of asthma really aren't asthma so whether it is an epidemic may be academic.
You are probably right. Those with genuine asthma need to understand the condition and be prepared to deal with it at the onset. My point is that the doctor in our case took a complaint that it was "hard to breathe" on the first and only visit regarding this symptom and diagnosed asthma on the spot, after twenty seconds of listening through the stethoscope. He prescribed an inhaler, which was never used, and voila, we were part of the asthma "epidemic". I think the doctor took the diagnosis far too lightly and that impacts people like your daughter with genuine, life-threatening asthma.
A couple of years ago, a British doctor (it was a woman, but I forget her name) thought it might be that kids are overimmunized today -- nobody's allowed to get what used the standard childhood diseases (you mention them!) and this leaves their immune systems out of whack.
Both my older bother and I had a history of childhood asthma and my brother has a severe peanut allergy, yet both of us were born in the 1940s. Our father who was a family practice physician for more than 50 years had many young patients with similar childhood asthma problems. This is NOT a new problem.
And don't even get me started on peanut alergies!
What's up with that?
Babies & Solid Foods
The optimal age for the introduction of selected supplemental food should be six months, concluded Dr. Fiocchi. Particularly in children with family history of allergic disease, attention must be paid to the introduction of hens egg, peanut, tree nuts, fish, and seafood.
(Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006;97:1021)
I agree.
Keep out the turd world.
BUMP
Probably not. Assuming there is a necessary genetic component, we'd have to kill asthma carriers, or otherwise prevent them from reproducing. Better neonatal and pediatric care is ensuring that children with asthma live to sexual maturity, allowing their genes to propagate. If susceptibility to asthma is universal to humankind, we need to mutate a variant that isn't susceptible.
Big kudos to all the FR epidemiologists; now we know that asthma is caused by exercise, lack of activity, pollution, lack of pollution, allergens, lack of allergens, viruses, lack of viruses, immunization, lack of immunization, solid food too early, and solid food too late. Personally, I think it's rays.
Could it have been shag carpet?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.