Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William Tell

You are probably right. Those with genuine asthma need to understand the condition and be prepared to deal with it at the onset. My point is that the doctor in our case took a complaint that it was "hard to breathe" on the first and only visit regarding this symptom and diagnosed asthma on the spot, after twenty seconds of listening through the stethoscope. He prescribed an inhaler, which was never used, and voila, we were part of the asthma "epidemic". I think the doctor took the diagnosis far too lightly and that impacts people like your daughter with genuine, life-threatening asthma.


33 posted on 12/01/2006 8:10:52 AM PST by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: caseinpoint
caseinpoint said: "My point is that the doctor in our case took a complaint that it was "hard to breathe" on the first and only visit regarding this symptom and diagnosed asthma on the spot, after twenty seconds of listening through the stethoscope. "

If the "hard to breathe" condition is actually present during the doctor visit, then that would be a perfect time to use the inspirometer to get a reading of the amount of constriction. It is possible that a stethoscope could detect the additional noise that a constricted airway could generate. But the presumption would seem to be that the constricted airway would disappear when the "hard to breathe" condition disappears. Also, the inspirometer permits a quantification of the condition that would be hard to determine using a stethoscope.

49 posted on 12/01/2006 11:15:55 AM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson