Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Count Me In The Guiliani Camp (Debbie Schlussel: He Has The Cojones TO Fight Islamofascism Alert)
Debbie Schlussel.com ^ | 08/15/2006 | Debbie Schlussel

Posted on 11/15/2006 7:40:33 AM PST by goldstategop

Every day, I'm asked whom I'm supporting for President in 2008. I've looked over the potential candidates, and on the Republican side, I believe the best, by far, is Rudy Giuliani, who took the first step toward a run, yesterday, with an exploratory committee.

(On the Democratic side, the best guy who's been talked about as a Presidential contender is Senator Evan Bayh from Indiana, who truly understands the Islamic threat and is a more moderate Democrat--which is why he'll never get the nomination.)

Yes, I'm pro-life and against gay rights, where Giuliani shares neither of my views on these issues. But, to me, the terrorism issue is far more important, #1 on the list. Right now, we have a President who is pro-life, against gay rights, and pretends to be the "Counterterrorism Prez." But, actually, he's done nothing substantive on any of these issues.

Rudy Giuliani: Then-NYC Mayor Had Guts to Stop Yasser Arafat's Stateside Escapades

So, I'll take the guy who I know will have the guts to do what Bush does not. I believe Giuliani is that man. He's proven that time and again, whether it was when he told terror-supporting Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal to take his $10 million and shove it (right after 9/11) or when he severely restricted Yasser Arafat's travel in New York (kicking him out of a concert).

A man who will do those things vs. Bush PC on Islam is the man we need to run this country. He's probably also the man who can handle the illegal alien problem and actually see to it that something is done about it. Not sure on his position on guest workers, but we'll soon enough find out.

It will be a difficult matter for a pro-choice, pro-gay rights candidate (and, again, I oppose Giuliani on these issues) to get the GOP nomination. We'll see.

So for those who want to know who I'm supporting for Prez, I say, "Viva Rudy." America's Mayor has what it takes to be America's President.

Gutsy Giuliani Tells Saudi Prince Alwaleed Where to Go


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 08election; 2008election; 2008gopnomination; 2008issues; 911; debbieschlussel; hillaryisalooser; islamofascism; racefor2008; rudy; rudyguiliani; vivarudy; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-245 next last
To: RichardW
"Remember Paul of Tarsus. "

If Rudy has had a conversion and can sincerely renounce his liberalism he will win the nomination and the election (barring the usual unpredictables).

Such fantasies as that he would win because the Dems will run as the weak party on terrorism (!), or that he can win without renouncing his liberal past are useless.

141 posted on 11/15/2006 9:53:23 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: trisham
LOL

"Agreed. I wonder if she'd consider joining Free Republic and kicking some whiner derriere here?"

I say go for it! Contact her and get the ball rolling. She could probably use our encouragement just to put up with some of the abuse the media dumps on her regularly. But she is wonderful at handling the media too. She takes no hostages. Remember her most recent confrontation with that "Wolf" on CNN?

She is always the lady...to me an amazing feat given some of characters she encounters. When you can give supremely better than you take and remain a lady; you've earned my respect!!

Nancee

142 posted on 11/15/2006 9:54:39 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

My biggest fear is if we don't put up a good alternative to McVain, say an 800-pound Gorilla like Giuliani, McVain will take his marbles and run as an independent. Can you say Madam President? I'm with Schlussel - taking a stance against Islamofascism and terrorism without being PC about it is #1 in my book. It's an issue people can agree on. McVain is a backstabber. If he doesn't get his way, watch out.


143 posted on 11/15/2006 9:55:18 AM PST by Spyder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: eureka!

I see very little favorable coverage of any Republican in the Treason Media.

McCain has been a national figure for decades so having his name if front of us is nothing sinister. And I don't think it is going to matter anyway.


144 posted on 11/15/2006 9:55:55 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: RichardW
I agree with you and don't see why others can't understand that point...it's not brain surgery: If we are attacked and the fanatics win, NONE of these other issues will matter. Our FIRST choice has to be somebody who will keep our country and economy intact. SECONDLY, that person also HAS to be electable.

I would love to see Newt or somebody completely, faithfully conservative win, but I don't believe they could capture the votes of the critical TV-glued, MSM-programmed "independent" public.

145 posted on 11/15/2006 9:56:27 AM PST by BBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

I have plenty of reasons but won't speak for you. Existence has beauties both manifold and extensive.

None of my reasons to live involve politics at all.


146 posted on 11/15/2006 9:58:48 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: RichardW

I've often thought there are quite a few DU plants here too, masquerading as Christian conservatives looking out for the good of the GOP. And why are so many discrediting Romney due to his religion? That is quite bigoted. My favorite of them all is Guiliani and his social-issue views would not impact a presidency and judges he'd choose would be strict constructionists. His favorite of the Supremes is Scalia.


147 posted on 11/15/2006 9:58:58 AM PST by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RichardW
Please explain to me if you can. Why do those of your persuasion, what ever that persuasion may be, assume that standing in defense of the helpless unborn, is ruled by one's religious convictions alone, rather than human nature to stand up for any helpless creature that is being abused. And why does it matter to you , what drives people to defend the powerless?

No one is beyond the reach of God, but who can be expected to believe a politician who reverses everything he has stood by until it becomes politically proper to do so?
148 posted on 11/15/2006 10:00:28 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (We'll stop calling you liberals,liberals, as soon as we find a better word for "sh*t for brains" .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
"I see very little favorable coverage of any Republican in the Treason Media."

Unless they are bashing W or the GOP...

149 posted on 11/15/2006 10:01:04 AM PST by eureka! (Heaven forbid the Rats get control of Congress and/or the Presidency any time soon....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Spyder

I am no big fan of McCain but do not believe he would do anything like that you fear. McCain thinks for himself and that can make him unpopular since he is somewhat unpredictable. But I don't believe him to be either disloyal or unstable. I don't fear him.


150 posted on 11/15/2006 10:01:56 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: RichardW
"But I think he really hurt himself on that Shiavo deal."

No doubt he did, but this further makes my point. He does the right thing and then, as he said recently on Glenn Beck: "...let the chips fall where they may."

When one has a core self so rock solid, he can always be counted to do the right thing...even in the face of momentous pressure to back down, he's my man!!

I understand your point concerning Nixon, but there is where the parallels between the two men end. That is just my opinion.

Nancee

151 posted on 11/15/2006 10:02:14 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: eureka!

And that is generally taken out of context.


152 posted on 11/15/2006 10:02:44 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

A man who supports illegal aliens CAN'T POSSIBLY be a strong opponent of Islamic terrorists - nor can a man who doesn't believe in ALL the articles in the bill of right
(.i.e. the Second One) belong in the White House.

Rudy Giuliani - big on talk - weak on delivery.


153 posted on 11/15/2006 10:03:05 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

You are exactly right that if there is no alternative there is no win but once again I will not vote for he/she who is contradictory to my moral beliefs just because he/she is less worse than the other.


154 posted on 11/15/2006 10:04:31 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

We need a President with the cojones to take on Islamofascism. Like Debbie Schlussel, I don't buy into Rudy Guiliani's pro-choice and pro-gay views. But he does understand what is at stake with the enemy we face. For me, that's #1. If we don't win the War On Terror, nothing else will matter. Conservatives should see Hillary isn't up to the job. Evan Bayh is the one Democrat who might fit that bill, which is why the Democrats will never nominate him. Let's hear it for the heroic Mayor Of New York! ""

I agree. If we don't put a complete stop to these radicals, no part of any of our "lifestyles" will matter.

There will be no arguments about Same-sex marriage because the radicals will behead both "partners" as perverse to their teachings.
There will be no private property rights, because they will take everything from you.
Your pet dogs will be killed, as they consider dogs "Unclean".
There will be no other religions because that is at the core of their thoughts and ambitions. You are Islam or you are DEAD.
Wall Street and investment growth will disappear.
"Fashion" will not matter.
Entertainment as we know it will disappear. Paris Hilton will join the "missing" and presumed beheaded group.
Media will have no freedom to print what they want. There won't even be a crossword puzzle in the NYT.
It is just that simple in their minds.
CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE.

If we don't elect a President and a Congress that realizes all of the above and more, we can all kiss goodbye to what we have worked so hard to build in our personal lives.


155 posted on 11/15/2006 10:05:21 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: supremedoctrine

No, you're right. And it's more than just his "security consulting" that's a problem here. His company does consulting work for all different types of clients -- and nobody seems to know what his expertise is. He's a deal-maker selling his contacts in politics, and nothing more (Forbes Magazine had a recent article describing a bunch of the idiotic consulting contracts he's secured in the last couple of years).


156 posted on 11/15/2006 10:08:05 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

All your reasons for living are influenced by politics, whether you admit it or not.

Why don't you just get out of the way of people who are not in denial about the influence politics play in their lives?


157 posted on 11/15/2006 10:08:34 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (We'll stop calling you liberals,liberals, as soon as we find a better word for "sh*t for brains" .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

ping


158 posted on 11/15/2006 10:09:33 AM PST by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith
When Reagan ran in 80, he had already been a candidate in 68 and 76. By then, he had support, money, following, and media attention. It's AWFULLY HARD to gin that up quickly if you don't already have that by now.

Great -- then let Rudy lose in 2008 and 2012 before he presents himself as a serious candidate.

Rudy hasn't even been in elected office in five years -- and his eight-year tenure as mayor of New York City is the only experience he's ever had in an elected capacity. To call this a "track record" of any kind in the context of a presidential bid is really a stretch.

159 posted on 11/15/2006 10:10:44 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I suggest you pay more attention to your tagline.


160 posted on 11/15/2006 10:11:14 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson