Posted on 11/14/2006 3:00:14 PM PST by Paul Ross
Navy officials confirmed yesterday that an aircraft carrier battle group failed to detect a Chinese submarine that surfaced within weapons range of the USS Kitty Hawk. Anti-submarine defenses for the carrier battle group will be reviewed as a result, they said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
China's Submarine ChallengeJohn Tkacik notes therein:
Americas Endangered Submarine Supremacy
In February 2005, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld commented that the size of the Chinese fleet could surpass the United States Navys within a decade. It is an issue that the department thinks about and is concerned about and is attentive to. Indeed, the U.S. Navy will hold a series of major naval exercises in the Pacific this summer that will involve four aircraft carrier battle groups, including a carrier normally based on the U.S. East Coast. This will be the first time the Navy has deployed an Atlantic Fleet carrier to a Pacific exercise since the Vietnam War.
However, there is little indication that the Pentagon is taking the Chinese submarine challenge seriously. If it were, the QDR issued earlier this month would have recommended that the erosion of the U.S. submarine fleet come to an end."
Not a problem. The several dozen P-8As the Navy will be able to buy by 2019 will solve that problem... /sarcasm
OOPSEE. Some LA Class submariners in trouble!
Anti submarine warfare is the bastard son of the US Navy. It is about time the stinkin' carrier admirals were put in their place, given a history lesson of WW1 and the WW2 Battle of the Atlantic. The best ASW weapon is another sub. Preferably a Seawolf.
How and why is any of this being made public knowledge?
That would be a good start.
Then...rapidly build up the force of Littoral Combat Ships, heavily weighted to anti-mine and anti-submarine warfare in the littorals and take the fight direct to the littorals, finding and outing the diesel electrics that lurk their.
They've stopped the Seawolf class at three boats, the last one being the USS Jimmy Carter. Moving on to the Virginia class now.
The Viking was originally built for ASW. The idiot who downgraded that role needs to be outed and publically flogged.
Carriers are nice, and we need them, but if that Song class had been serious the Kitty Hawk would have been toast. That is doubleplus ungood.
Modern diesel-electric boats are getting faster, quieter, smaller and cheaper. They don't have to snort anywhere near as often as older models and lots of countries are making them.
ASW is serious business and we damn well need to get serious about it again.
It was to send a message, my take, back off of North Korea.
*LOL* My husband was a sonar tech on a Los Angeles class submarine, and we agree with you that the submarine fleet needs a major boost. It's especially important now that the LA class boats are getting old and are being decommissed at a rate of a handful a year now. Whether or not our current leadership agrees with us remains to be seen...
Deliberate misinformation.
Results of the review are in. The sonar should be turned on in case of possible hostiles. Ping.
I was a submarine sonar tech from 1984 to 1990. Our sonar systems have trouble hearing diesel boats. We knew this for all this time. We have have worked to correct this problems.
What I find interesting, and maybe my more submarine experienced friends on here might help me on this, is that there's no mention of one of our SSNs (there's at least one with every carrier battle group) tailing this Chinese boat. That's the feeling I get from this story, that there's more to it that what we're seeing here. Again, I could be wrong.
Exactly ! People are reading what we want them to hear !
But that Song would not have been there in war time situations...at least not very easily at all. We announce where our carriers are going right now...for all the world to see. We shouldn't do that, and wouldn't in any serious conflict with any maritime power.
The DEs are not fast enough and do not have the endurance to try and keep up with, intyercept or shadow a CSG in transit...even the best of them. All they can do is hope to wait in the right place for a CSG to come along. In war, that would be a long shot...but one I am sure they would take.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.