1 posted on
11/09/2006 9:04:18 AM PST by
Hal1950
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Hal1950
A Klintoon Kover-up of monumental proportions, IMHO........
2 posted on
11/09/2006 9:08:05 AM PST by
Red Badger
(New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
To: Rokke
3 posted on
11/09/2006 9:13:08 AM PST by
GarySpFc
(Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
To: Hal1950
I've always had a hard time believing the cover-up theory. What exactly was the motivation? To prevent the need to a military response against militant Islam? To prevent panic? To prevent the country blaming Clinton for allowing it to happen? I suppose all three of these theories have been bandied about, but, I'm sorry, none of them seem convincing to me.
5 posted on
11/09/2006 9:15:40 AM PST by
dinoparty
To: Hal1950
TWA 800, Oklahoma City Bombing, Chinese campain money, and so forth, all covered up in the interest of a New Tone.
6 posted on
11/09/2006 9:17:04 AM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
To: Hal1950
The missile approached the aircraft on a descending track from the rear and struck it without exploding. That's convenient, since it eliminates the evidence of explosion or fragmentation on the outside of the aircraft. Surface to air missiles of that era had proximity fused warheads. I find it hard to believe this was a hit-to-kill mechanism like THAAD or PAC-3, since the Clinton administration killed the missile defense projects. So who did this and why would the Clinton admin cover it up?
7 posted on
11/09/2006 9:20:13 AM PST by
edpc
(Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
To: Hal1950
Everyone refers to TWA 800 as a terror attack. No one will be surprised if it is incontrovertibly proven.
9 posted on
11/09/2006 9:22:46 AM PST by
OldFriend
(Run and Hide, Tax and Spend for the next two years. Everyone happy?)
To: Hal1950
I have NO DOUBT that that flight was brought down by a surface to air missile. NO DOUBT. The government covered it up and LIED to you. Other credible sources with knowledge have said the same - that KNOW what went on.
Today, surface to air missile incidents are not unheard of. It's accepted. THEN it wasn't so well known and of course they wanted to protect the sheeple with a sense of false security.
13 posted on
11/09/2006 9:24:07 AM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: Hal1950
"In the best of all possible worlds, Ray Lahr's case may just crack open the official door."
No, Klinton slammed the door shut and GWB is a lame duck. In no form will Demoncrats who control the House and the Senate allow any cover up to be exposed under their scumbag of a leader, Klinton.
16 posted on
11/09/2006 9:26:29 AM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: Hal1950
Just curious. When the IslamoNazi's do a terrorist act they always brag about it. Why have they not done so in this case? I mean I can't remember hearing any claims from them.
22 posted on
11/09/2006 9:33:02 AM PST by
reagandemo
(The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
To: Hal1950
he author argues that the first of the three was a large surface-to-air missile launched from 16 to 22 miles west of the crash site.That would put the launch site on or near Fire Island. There would certainly be some witnesses to the missle launches on a July evening.
24 posted on
11/09/2006 9:35:04 AM PST by
MediaMole
(9/11 - We have already forgotten.)
To: Hal1950
25 posted on
11/09/2006 9:36:33 AM PST by
bkepley
To: Hal1950
Why didn't they just call the Acme Missile Detection Agency and get Super Snooper to track it........
Oh, wait! That's probably where the mysterious CD came from.
Well that proves it for me.
I really thought it was the UFO's Death Ray up until now.
27 posted on
11/09/2006 9:36:46 AM PST by
higgmeister
(In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
To: Hal1950
Where is the investigative piece?
28 posted on
11/09/2006 9:41:38 AM PST by
yoe
To: Hal1950
You can bet if it was a repub Prez in control at the time. Never would a cover up been allowed to happen.
29 posted on
11/09/2006 9:42:16 AM PST by
dforest
(be careful you don't become what you hate the most)
To: Hal1950
What about the Navy's order to destroy all P-3 laser cannons, secretly issued shortly after the shoot down?
To: Hal1950
I am personally skeptical of deep dark conspiracy theories. The "professionalism" of a document may just mean that the author had a lot of time on his hands.
In design and analysis the rule is to go with the simplest answer that fits the requirements. In this case, it is a single terrorist firing a single missile downing the jet. This was followed by a Clinton administration which refused to acknowledge the existence of a domestic terrorism threat.
BTW: I have slightly more than a passing interest in this story. I still keep an old boarding pass of mine pinned to my cube wall:
TW0800 Y JFK CDG
SEAT 24-4 SMOKING NO
19MAR96
To: Hal1950
Some will say I am crazy, but I am almost positive someone showed on a news channel the radar data that showed TWA 800 and something intersecting with it, then both disappeared on one of the news shows shortly after it happened?
34 posted on
11/09/2006 9:48:52 AM PST by
pnz1
(Pray for our troops-they need it now more than ever..)
To: Hal1950
36 posted on
11/09/2006 9:50:14 AM PST by
dakine
To: Hal1950
It was Bush's fault that he did not open the investigation again. No joke.
57 posted on
11/09/2006 10:08:48 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(The snake is loose in the garden and Eve just bit the apple.)
To: Hal1950
Huh? The Clinton administration COVERED UP a terrorist attack on American citizens?? I'm shocked. Shocked, I say.
What's that you say? The MSM didn't investigate the Clinton administration's lack of concern about American security? I'm shocked. Shocked, I say.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson