Claims were made at the time. I can't remember who it was right off the top of my head, but I recall seeing information about this several times. IIRC, the FBI initially mentioned a couple of groups claiming responsibility, then... nothing...
From what I've read of this incident, it was a missile.
The Bush administration covered up all the clinton's crimes.
They apparently did, in advance.
Check this pdf out. Supposedly, it says:
"tomorrow morning we will strike the Americans in a way they do not expect and it will be very surprising to them," ...
"The Mujahadeen will respond harshly to the threats of the stupid American president. All will be shocked by the magnitude of the response. The determining of the place and time are in the hands of the Mujahadeen. The invaders must get ready to leave alive or dead; and their rendezvous will be morning, and isn't morning near."
--Just curious. When the IslamoNazi's do a terrorist act they always brag about it. Why have they not done so in this case? I mean I can't remember hearing any claims from them.--
If Saddam was involved, he could not have bragged, without being blown to smithereens. Ditto for the OKC bombing.
It'a BIG IF, but would explain the perpetrators' silence.
Also, there MAY have been claims of responsibility that were simply buried by the Clinton-friendly Enemedia. We just never heard about them.
That said, I haven't read 'First Strike'. However, 'The Third Terrorist' by Jayna Davis raises many questions, indicating how an FBI motivated to cover-up evidence of a terrorist act could have pulled it off.
Wrong plane. Nothing to brag about.