Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Burns refuses to concede, wants more ballots counted
Missoulian State Bureau ^ | November 08 2006 | CHARLES S. JOHNSON and JENNIFER McKEE,

Posted on 11/08/2006 3:01:35 PM PST by george76

Defeated U.S. Sen. Conrad Burns, R-Mont., refused to concede Wednesday saying there remain votes yet to be counted in his tight race against the declared winner, Democrat Jon Tester.

Burns, who has not commented to reporters on the race since the votes were counted Tuesday night, released a statement at 1:47 p.m.

“Jon Tester ran a good race and has the lead right now, but it is extremely close,” Burns said. “The state of Montana has a process in place, and it is our obligation to see it through. There are still votes out there that deserve to be counted.

“I believe we need to continue to let that process play itself out, and there is no need to rush to a conclusion when votes are this close.”

As of mid-afternoon Wednesday, the unofficial vote count showed Tester with a 2,847-vote lead, with all 867 precincts reporting. Here were the totals:

- Tester, 198,302 votes, for 49.1 percent.

- Burns, 195,455 votes for 48.4 percent.

- Stan Jones, Libertarian, 10,324 votes for 2.6 percent.

Only two kinds of ballots had yet to be counted Wednesday afternoon, said Bowen Greenwood, a spokesman for Secretary of State Brad Johnson.

People who went to the polls Tuesday, but forgot to bring some kind of identification, were able to cast provisional ballots.

Those ballots will only be counted if the voter returns today with proper identification by 5 p.m. Wednesday. Greenwood estimated that about 1,000 provisional ballots were cast Tuesday.

Also, the office will continue to count ballots coming in from Montanans serving in the military overseas for a few days after the election.

Greenwood said it was impossible to know how many of those may come in.

(Excerpt) Read more at missoulian.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: 2006electionfraud; ballots; burns; congress; conradburns; conservatives; democrat; democrats; disenfranchised; election; election2006; elections; gop; helena; howtostealanelection; iraq; jontester; libertarian; libertarians; losertarians; military; militaryballots; moralabsolutes; republicans; senate; unamerican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-166 next last
To: George W. Bush

It is a very long shot.

But the military deserves to have their votes counted too.


101 posted on 11/09/2006 8:07:35 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg; All

What gets me are the many races in which the candidates win by a 100 or a thousand or so votes...you know extremely close...that's what smells...no strong mandates any-where!

The years before the civil war were much like that...polarization....only in this case its the male female polarisation that is occurring in many of these races.


102 posted on 11/09/2006 8:12:48 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Save the Republic! Mess with the polling firms' heads!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: george76

How typical. The Rats think the military ballots are unimportant.


103 posted on 11/09/2006 8:16:31 AM PST by I'm ALL Right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I'm ALL Right!

The Rats hate the military and know that the military will not waste their votes.


104 posted on 11/09/2006 8:22:17 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
Makes you wonder if George Soros was donating to the campaigns of the local Libertarian candidates.

ACLU was pushing for the local Libertarian, Smither in TX CD22, who drew some Republican voters away from the Republican write-in candidate.

The DNC actually gave $50k to a nobody write-in candidate, in another attempt to bleed off support for the Republican write-in candidate.
105 posted on 11/09/2006 8:52:47 AM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: anymouse; Grampa Dave; No.6; onyx; Mo1

" Makes you wonder if George Soros was donating to the campaigns of the local Libertarian candidates..."


excellent !


106 posted on 11/09/2006 9:08:50 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

I wouldn't put it past him


107 posted on 11/09/2006 9:10:01 AM PST by Mo1 (Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 2 heart beats away from the Presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
The DNC actually gave $50k to a nobody write-in candidate, in another attempt to bleed off support for the Republican write-in candidate

I didn't know about that

108 posted on 11/09/2006 9:11:53 AM PST by Mo1 (Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 2 heart beats away from the Presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: george76

Right! Wow -- of course he did. Makes perfect sense!!!


109 posted on 11/09/2006 9:12:14 AM PST by onyx (I'm now a minority and victim of the democrats, but with full and free entitlements!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: RKM

And Libertarians will continue to poll around 2% and Democrats will keep winning until you get the message


110 posted on 11/09/2006 9:15:44 AM PST by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Grampa Dave; Mo1; jan in Colorado; Morgan in Denver; Clintonfatigued; freema; bitt

This is the difference :

Tester, 198,302 votes, for 49.1 percent.

- Burns, 195,455 votes for 48.4 percent.

- Jones, Libertarian, 10,324 votes for 2.6 percent.



Similar in many other races across the country.


111 posted on 11/09/2006 9:21:22 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: george76; BigSkyFreeper

I saw that one posted on a thread and thought it was very telling.

I will ping BSF because on that other thread, posters said that Jones is a real lulu... a totally wasted vote.


112 posted on 11/09/2006 9:23:33 AM PST by onyx (I'm now a minority and victim of the democrats, but with full and free entitlements!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

I'm only going to take a guess...but I doubt that there are more than 1,500 military absentee ballots involved...of which half probably are already there. So its hard to see this changing much. But....you can never tell. It might be the most shocking moment of 2006...to see a guy win with military absentee ballots.


113 posted on 11/09/2006 9:25:26 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111; Cedar

You fail to understand that the 'GOP' as is the DNC, is a grass-roots organization, bottom to top. You can't complain about a party insofar as you remove yourself from involvement in it.


114 posted on 11/09/2006 9:28:24 AM PST by mbraynard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: onyx

If Burns got all those votes Stan Jones got, we'd be looking at a re-election. Libertarians are spoiler candidates that elect Democrats.


115 posted on 11/09/2006 9:28:24 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Heck, Burns only needed 3000 of them.


116 posted on 11/09/2006 9:29:11 AM PST by onyx (I'm now a minority and victim of the democrats, but with full and free entitlements!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: george76
Similar in many other races across the country.

Yea .. I've noticed that

117 posted on 11/09/2006 9:32:20 AM PST by Mo1 (Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 2 heart beats away from the Presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

I think in many places they count the military along with others absentee ballots last- hoping the candidate behind will concede and it won't be "necessary" to count them at all. I think this practice has been going on for years in many places (like FL) and these tight races bring a little sunshine on the issue.


118 posted on 11/09/2006 9:33:10 AM PST by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

JD Hayworth in Arizona is complaining because a meager 250,000 early, military and provisional votes have not been counted. Not all would be in his 5th District but they could change the outcome.

Historically, early ballots are more likely -R instead of -D. Same with military. The local rag (AZ Repulsive) says JD should just give it up!

Kaka



119 posted on 11/09/2006 9:33:41 AM PST by lawdude (The dems see Wal-Mart as a bigger threat to the US than muslim terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Worth keeping in mind that Montana military can only vote if they pay taxes in the state.


120 posted on 11/09/2006 9:34:16 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson