Posted on 11/08/2006 8:08:12 AM PST by Matchett-PI
Has Our Time Come? http://www.hereticalideas.com/
A **new study from the Cato Institute [see link below] suggests that libertarians might be the new swing vote.
The libertarian vote is in play. At some 13 percent of the electorate, it is sizable enough to swing elections. Pollsters, political strategists, candidates, and the media should take note of it.
After examining the relevant polling data, Cato concludes that libertarians and libertarian sympathizers constitute somewhere between 10 and 20% of the American population. Some explanations are offered as to why libertarians constitute such a bigger constituency than one might expect. First is that libertarians tend not to be as well-organized as other interest groups. Most groups that organize and try to exert political influence want some sort of government action: unions want favorable labor laws passed, the Christian Coalition wants abortion outlawed and anti-homosexual laws passed, environmentalists want pollution restricted and ecosystems protected, businesses want favorable tax and commercial laws. Libertarians generally don’t want government to take action, and are therefore less likely to organize into a pressure group because of that. It also argues that the difficulty people have in breaking out of the left-right liberal-conservative paradigm of politics keeps “populists” (authoritarians) and libertarians underrepresented. While most political scholarship accepts the inadequacy of a simple one-dimensional view of politics, it hasn’t sunk down into popular culture as strongly. Often talk shows and debate programs on television and radio will feature someone “from the left” and someone “from the right”, squeezing libertarians out of the picture.
An unexplored reason that might contribute is the higher prevalence of libertarianism among younger people than older people. The Cato paper notes this statistic but doesn’t explore its relationship to voter turnout. It explains the phenomenon this way. Younger people were more influenced by 2 of the most significant individualist movements of the 20th century: the ’60s counter culture and the ’80s Reagan Revolution. As a result, younger generations have seen both the socially liberal and the economically conservative side of individualism and turn to libertarianism as a way to emulate both ideals. The downside is that since younger people in general are less likely to vote, libertarians wind up underrepresented at the polls.
But don’t libertarian have to swing their votes to become a swing vote? Well, more and more frequently libertarian-minded people are losing the loyalty to the party they usually vote for (mostly the GOP), which puts their vote as a bloc in play.
Many commentators noted the high turnout in the 2004 election. Nationally, voter turnout increased 6.1 percent. That might help explain some of the swing in 2004. According to ANES data, libertarians reported turning out to vote at higher percentages than total respondents in 2000 and even higher in 2004.
This libertarian swing trend is particularly pronounced by age. Libertarians aged 18–29 many of whom were new voters in 2004 voted 71–42 for Kerry. Libertarians aged 30–49 voted almost completely the reverse, 72–21 for Bush.
Going back to the generational argument, I imagine that older individuals who can remember a time when the religious Right wasn’t nearly as omnipresent of a force in the Republican Party and therefore don’t automatically associate it with tirades about the moral dangers of homosexuality and feticide. So I can understand younger libertarians leaning more democratic than older ones who might remember the time of more Goldwater-like or even maybe Reagan-like Republicans.
What does all this mean in practical terms? What will we see coming out of the major political parties Conservatives resist cultural change and personal liberation; liberals resist economic dynamism and globalization. Libertarians embrace both. The political party that comes to terms with that can win the next generation.
It would really be great to see both political parties converge to a libertarian center. But as the article points out, the nature of libertarians makes them much harder to corral than other groups, which makes attracting us to their political parties a far more expensive and riskier proposition than going after churchgoers and soccer moms. Perhaps in time it will happen. But I doubt it will happen very soon.
** http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718392/posts
I voted conservative. Across the board. My conscience is clear.
Your's seems to be bugging you about something though.
Whatever you're smoking to allow you to reach that conclusion is most likely illegal.
EVERYONE would vote for them except the far, far left wing socialist/communists. Conservatism ALWAYS wins. Even the democrats this election ran as social conservatives. They got it only half right, and they still won.
Dude, I served over there and resent b.s. like this. How does pork and political correction and illegal alien amnesty help this country?
That about sums it up.
Libertarians are rats with another name.
I personally think that with REAL fiscal restraint, many problems would fix themselves. It's social conservatism that turns so many swing voters off.
Hardly. They approved the building of a wimpy fence over a small percentage of our border, but they failed to fund it.
What conscience? Are you the ugly teenage girl who is proud of having maintained her virginity?
Well good for you, then. May your sense of smug self-satisfaction lead you all the way to the opposite of what you say you want.
Ask the Dems, because now you will get more!
I'm sure the Democrats will do far better with that issue. They'll probably even ask Tom Tancredo to head a Task Force regarding it.
Didn't think you'd know what that meant. Just keep pushing your liberal RINO's if you really want to entrench the Dems.
Well, the Democrats have the Green party
And our retarded cousin we keep locked in the basement are the Libertarians
They are so hell bent on voting based on a single issue as opposed to the bigger picture.
Small minded people incapable of seeing the bigger picture are often the most difficult to deal with.
Some one needs to explain to them that their actions last night will result in even less of their agenda from ever seeing the light of day in the next few years.
I voted Republican pretty much across the board, because I had conservative republicans to vote for...
Maybe, maybe not. But as a multiterm incumbent, Burns made his own mistakes.
A conservative site? What does that mean? Cheerleaders for the greatest expansion in big government for decades and a budget busting prescription drugs program?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.