Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We do indeed live in interesting times
Judgement Day '06 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 11/07/2006 11:45:49 PM PST by Jim Robinson

We do indeed live in interesting times.

I believe our resolve is about to be tested like it's never been tested before and I pray we're up for it.

The Democrats and the leftist media see this election as a mandate against the president and the war. They are about to pull out all the stops in their mission to totally demoralize the American people. If they succeed to the point we pull out of Iraq before the Iraqis are strong enough to defend themselves, I'm afraid it'll be the Killing Fields all over again. Only this time much much worse and much closer to home.

Praying we have the national resolve to resist the enemy within. Praying we maintain the will to continue the fight against the global jihadists. Our very right to survive as a nation and a free people depends on it.

Our president and our troops are going to need our prayers and support now more than ever.

God willing, America will survive!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-327 next last
To: Gator113

We needed him to get our borders under control, so he wasn't exactly always there when we needed him. As for stabbing him in the back, where did you get that?

Bush is a good man. He is not a great man. In some ways he has been quite good, but in others he has been quite bad.

Impeachment is a deliberative process by a body of people who have been elected by the citizens of our nation. It is not something I want to see. I do believe it would be foolish. None the less, it is not treasonous.

As for starting a civil war over it, that would be the worst possible outcome.

Letting the Democrats make fools out of themselves would more likely destroy them than Bush.


141 posted on 11/08/2006 12:56:07 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
For what it's worth - here are the exit poll results.
142 posted on 11/08/2006 12:56:55 AM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
This was a repudiation of Rumsfeld and Bush and the way the war was conducted and the reasons for going to war.

Fine, let them change commanders-in-chief in the constitutional way, the presidential election. Until then they will have a say on financing the war, not on fighting it.

143 posted on 11/08/2006 12:57:23 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (These days you are either nervous and uncomfortable or you are braindead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

America has never faced an enemy like this before and never had to face enemies from within as vicious as the left before who are bent on destroying everything we hold dear.


144 posted on 11/08/2006 12:57:53 AM PST by beckysueb (Pray for President Bush and our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

What would be classic would be Cheney getting to offer up tie-breakers. He's the one guy the dems hate worse than Bush, and for the life of me I don't get why.


145 posted on 11/08/2006 12:58:46 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

good guns, good reloaders and Free Republic,I'm in.


146 posted on 11/08/2006 1:00:25 AM PST by advertising guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

If being ignored is supposed to be some big deal, you've evidently already forgotten the last five and a half years.

I don't relish the dems being in control, but then I don't think the Rs took advantage while the sun shone, so here we are.

Let's see how timid the democrats are with implementing their agenda. Perpahps the Rs will learn a few things.

The Rs tried to moderate their plans in the interest of bipartisanship. You'll never hear that word again, I can guarantee you. Of course if you do, it will be lipservice only.

You see, the dems know what they want and they don't go catotonic at the risk of offending someone. They ram through what they want.

Think the dems will worry about signing to Kyoto? No, they'll do it. Think they'll hesitate to implement lots of global warming bull? No, they'll do it. Whatever they want, they'll do it.

Did we? LOL


147 posted on 11/08/2006 1:04:32 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz
It might not always.

You have to consider: We COULD have lost the Cold War. We COULD have lost WW2. We didn't, thank God, because we had men in charge that weren't afraid, and a public that had guts and could withstand the pain of a fight.

I thought that 2004 answered that question, and that we did still have the strength to fight. After tonight, I'm not sure.

People these days are of a different sort. They lack the resolve to press on an important issue for a lifetime. Case in point, if you look at marriage, it rarely lasts beyond a few years. I have seen a handful of people from the old generation that have lasted in their marriage for 50,60+ years. So 2004 was a reflection of this resolve, a willingness to commit for a season, but no further.
148 posted on 11/08/2006 1:04:47 AM PST by LuxMaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: meandog
that DOESN'T mean I wanted ALL Democrats to win!

It is mathematically possible that Webb will end up winning by 1 vote -- your vote. It is also possible that the Dems will control the Senate by 1 vote -- Webb's vote. This will mean no conservative Justices to replace Stevens and Ginsberg.

All because of you. The fact that you didn't mean for this to happen, is not relevant.

149 posted on 11/08/2006 1:05:22 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (These days you are either nervous and uncomfortable or you are braindead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

"The Moderates ran our party and ran it on the rocks. OK, just like in 1976 and 1992 time for the Conservatives to take back their party."

I agree...tired of the squishy middle...


150 posted on 11/08/2006 1:07:33 AM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

What did he say?


151 posted on 11/08/2006 1:08:47 AM PST by beckysueb (Pray for President Bush and our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Defender2

Amen buddy.


152 posted on 11/08/2006 1:10:12 AM PST by LuxMaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I think the dims are going to figure out real quick that this war isn't something that you can just opt out of.


153 posted on 11/08/2006 1:13:22 AM PST by BROKKANIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LuxMaker

And Ditto, Amen Buddy!!!!

Best FReegards,

D2


154 posted on 11/08/2006 1:14:12 AM PST by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Conservatives need to see this as an opportunity, NOT a disaster. The Moderates ran our party and ran it on the rocks. OK, just like in 1976 and 1992 time for the Conservatives to take back their party. To start with NEW Congress, NEW Leadership. Time for a hard charging no nonsense leadership in the US Senate and US House. Time for the Republican Insurgency to teach the Democrats what a REAL quagmire looks like. They wanted it. They lied to the American people about their real agenda to get it. Let them enjoy their Phyrric victory in 2006. They won most races by a few thousands votes. Let them go home in 2008 and try to defend their record of voting for Ms Nancy and Hillary Clinton's Big Socialist Agenda after running as Republican Lite in 2006.

Excellent post MNJohnnie! We lost a battle and a painful one but you are right this is not the end of the war by no means. Yes indeed let us take this as a great opportunity to rebuild our party on conservative principles get new vibrant leadership for the GOP and we will win in the future. Lets stop debating our differences and fight anew concerning our commonalities... I also think our troops in the field will get wind of this as we pursue our rebirth and it will help give them hope as well. Thanks again DN.

155 posted on 11/08/2006 1:16:56 AM PST by democrats_nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dakine
I agree...tired of the squishy middle...

Here is the solution for you. In 2008 settle for nothing less than a true conservative. Kick all the rinos out and that might get you somewhere.

156 posted on 11/08/2006 1:17:44 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Well folks, now we shall see. The people have spoken. Now we shall reap what we have sown.

Yes, we all survived the years of dummocrat control of the House and Senate. We may even survive this debacle. But I am not holding my breath. I barely scratch the 40,000/yr mark as far as salary and I know that my taxes will increase with these pathetic turds running the show in Washington.

Also, I can guarantee impeachment hearings against Bush. I also see a push to reinstate onerous gun control legislation. These will be trying times.


157 posted on 11/08/2006 1:18:20 AM PST by PAMadMax (Islam is the enemy of all mankind...AlJazeera is its PR Firm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Of course we won't. The dems win has nothing to do about the next two years but instead - setting the stage for the next election cycle.

This change will lead to greater Dem wins in 2008, including, imo, the Presidency. And no, it won't be Hillary.

158 posted on 11/08/2006 1:18:47 AM PST by Solson (magnae clunes mihi placent, nec possum de hac re mentiri.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dakine

There is a reason why our founding fathers put the entire House of Representatives up for re-election every two years.
And we are seeing it. And we will see it again in two years.

Pelosi's little speech led me to believe that just about everyone has misinterpreted the outcome of this election and misinterpreted what the people were saying.

It sickens me to see that the Dems think they have a mandate on anything. They will find out otherwise.

ahhhh... the wisdom of our fore-fathers


159 posted on 11/08/2006 1:23:32 AM PST by Ymani Cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

I live in the deep south and we did our part. We elected Bob Corker to the Senate.


160 posted on 11/08/2006 1:24:21 AM PST by beckysueb (Pray for President Bush and our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-327 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson