Skip to comments.
Republicans, This Is Why You MUST Vote!
ChronWatch ^
| 11/06/2006
| Doc Farmer
Posted on 11/05/2006 3:32:05 PM PST by DocFarmer
Republicans, This Is Why You MUST Vote!
Written by Doc Farmer
Monday, November 6 2006
ChronWatch.com
Tomorrow is Election Day. The miracle provided to you by the Founding Fathers in 1776, and protected and preserved for you by the blood of our best. A miracle that most Americans, sadly, take for granted.
Don't be one of those who take it for granted.
Especially if you're a rep/con/tair -- my more accurate term for the so-called "right". An amalgam of the core political constructs of Republicans, conservatives and libertarians.
For many, many months, you've been told that the lib/dem/soc/commies (my more accurate term for the so-called "left" -- an amalgam of the core political constructs of liberals, Democrats, socialists and communists, with some fascism and Nazism thrown in for good measure) will win this election. That they're for change, that they're more correct, more moral, more caring. Of course, it is the Mainstream Media telling you this. A media that is provably lib/dem/soc/commie in its voting, its attitude, and its unvarnished bias in reporting.
A lot of you probably don't want to vote tomorrow because you're ticked off about Bush, or the war, or immigration, or a whole host of other things. A lot of you probably don't want to vote tomorrow because the MSM is already declaring victory. All the polls (which they commission, word, and often misrepresent) show their side will win. All the "conventional wisdom" (which is neither) says the lib/dem/soc/commies will landslide. All the pundits, who were OH SO CORRECT in 2000, 2002 and 2004, have declared that the election tomorrow is a done deal. All the lib/dem/soc/commie candidates have already started measuring for drapes.
So why should you even bother to get out of your chair, drive to a polling station, wait in line, and do your duty as a Citizen of this Constitutional Republic?
What follows are the reasons you MUST vote tomorrow.
- Nancy Pelosi: You've not heard anything from this banshee from San Francisco in the past few weeks. For good reason. The lib/dem/soc/commies KNOW that if you see her for what she truly is, you'll run screaming to the polls begging to vote against her philosophy. A philosophy that will further assist the terrorists -- and yes, she has actively helped terrorists and terrorism over the past few years. Why? Because (wait for it, folks) she doesn't like Dubya. If the lib/dem/soc/commies get into power, she will be THIRD IN LINE for the presidency. She wants power. She doesn't care how many bodies she has to crawl over to get it. Those bodies, by the way, could quite easily include yours.
- Harry Reid: He's been a bit low-key, too, but for different reasons. The MSM have been actively suppressing his real estate fraud for several weeks now, because they want to focus on the "culture of corruption" in rep/con/tair-land. Are there crooks on the right? A few, yes. What happens to them? They get fired, they get tried, they get convicted and they get JAILED. What happens to lib/dem/soc/commies that are crooks? They get promoted into senior positions, or protected by their buddies, or they blame and go into rehab.
- William Jefferson: See above (but don't ask too many questions about why he keeps his bribe money in the freezer).
- Teddy Kennedy: He's a murderer. He's a liar. He's a fool. He's a danger to our nation. And he's one of their 'elder statesmen'? 'Nuff said.
- John Kerry, aka Hanoi John, aka Jean François Kerrée: He's a traitor. He has taken every opportunity to diss our troops, to bad mouth them, to accuse them of unspeakable crimes, while protecting the enemy. And then, when he makes a "joke" that openly infers that our soldiers in Iraq are stupid, he makes a faux apology that basically says, "I'm sorry that you're too stupid to understand my nuanced sense of humor". His own website (http://www.johnkerry.com/news/articles/newsarticle.html?id=80) even has an op/ed from the Seattle Post/Intelligencer ( http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/290735_kerryed.asp )which clumsily reaffirms Kerrys own belief that he is correct, thereby nullifying that bogus act of contrition. He even tries to make the excuse that he was talking about Bush being dumb. Considering the fact that Bush got better grades than he, his excuse sounds like most of what he's spreading. A hot, steamin' load of male bovine excrement.
- John Murtha: A former Marine (I know, there's supposedly no such thing as a former jarhead, but in this case I think they should make an exception) who doesn't even know where Okinawa is in relation to the Middle East, and he's their spokesman on military matters? A man who decides, before any evidence is presented to the proper authorities, that our military is guilty, and MUST be guilty, thereby avoiding all that annoying "innocent until proven" stuff. This from a guy who was implicated in ABSCAM (look it up) but wasn't arrested because he didn't want to accept a bribe "at this point" -- his words, on video (go here -- http://www.cnsnews.com/cns/video/2005/FBIAbscamMurtha.wvx ).
- Hillary Clinton: Because she's Hillary Clinton. No other explanation is necessary.
- Immigration: Look, I'm honked off about Dubya's terrible handling of illegal aliens (they're not guest workers, dammit!). However, rep/con/tairs in the House were the ONLY thing that kept his "all-inclusive" bill about immigration "reform" being put into play. Instead, they forced the creation of a security first bill. Granted, it's only 700 miles, but that's a start compared to what the opposition would provide. Lib/dem/soc/commies actively encourage illegal aliens and will provide them with amnesty followed by citizenship, because 1) they figure they'll get their vote and 2) they further the creation of an underclass, which provides lib/dem/soc/commies with a powerbase. Allow them to come into power, and you can kiss the borders, your job, the English language and America's culture goodbye.
- World War IV: It's not about Iraq. That is one front in an overall war against terrorism. Moreover, WE ARE WINNING IT with rep/con/tairs at the helm. Lib/dem/soc/commies, if allowed into power in the House or Senate, will pull another Vietnam. Remember that? LBJ micromanaged the war, which screwed things up badly. Nixon got in, and actually started winning the war by letting the Generals run the show. The mainstream media (and Jean François Kerrée) LIED about our actions and involvement there. Nevertheless, winning was something the lib/dem/soc/commies in Congress couldn't abide. As a result, they PULLED THE FUNDING. More of our troops died because of that. Millions of Cambodians died because of that. An entire region ended up under the thrall of communism. More millions died or were imprisoned and tortured. Lib/dem/soc/commies have done this to us before. They will do it again. Instead of having a war fought far away from us, terrorists will again come to our shores. Am I fear mongering? Yes. Why? Because sometimes, you need to be reminded of things that you SHOULD fear.
- Terrorists: They'll get more Constitutional rights from the lib/dem/soc/commies. As yours are taken away. Before the terrorists kill more Americans, that is.
- Intelligence: Lib/dem/soc/commies don't have any. Okay, okay, cheap shot (funny, but cheap). Seriously, though, the intell community will see their abilities to detect and prevent terrorist or battlefield attacks curtailed or eliminated if the lib/dem/soc/commies take power again. Don't believe me? Look back to when Harry Reid proclaimed with pride "We've killed the Patriot Act". Thankfully, he was wrong. If he and his cohorts get into power, he'll be right. The Gorelick Wall will return. Terrorist communications from/to other countries will no longer be monitored. The result? More Americans, on and off the battlefields, will die.
- North Korea: Lib/dem/soc/commies will capitulate. Clinton/Carter did it before, and look what it got us. A pot-bellied pig, starving his people so that he could build and blow up nukes. Nukes that he would happily fire at us directly if he could, and nukes that he will happily sell to terrorists so THEY can blow us up.
- Iran: Lib/dem/soc/commies will negotiate. With terrorists. Oh, and we all know how well that went the LAST time they had to deal with Tehran. Of course, I'm sure they'll get their global expert, Jimmy Carter, to do just as good a job this time as he did the last. Iran will still have their nukes. Before they start launching them.
- Israel: It won't be there anymore. See previous point.
- United Nations: Lib/dem/soc/commies will defer ALL of your rights to the UN. The Constitution will be totally superseded by the UN Charter.
- Taxes: Your money won't be yours anymore. To lib/dem/soc/commies, it never was yours. In their eyes, your success was and is only for them to redistribute, because you're not smart enough to spend it right, and because others who have done nothing to earn it need it more than you do. Because of that, you'll find that the economy will falter. The government will then take in LESS money (the more they tax, the less you have, but the less THEY take in, too). So they'll tax you more. And more.
- Judges: There's a good chance that at least one, and perhaps two slots will open up in the Supreme Court between now and January 20th 2009. Do you really want more Ruth Bader Ginzburgs or John Paul Stevens or David Souters, who will rewrite the Constitution or follow the laws of other countries for precedent? Or would you rather have more John Roberts and Anthony Scalias, who will FOLLOW the Constitution and, interpret law instead of invent it?
- Abortion: Over 47 million innocent lives have been sacrificed at the alter of Roe v. Wade. Want to see that become 50 million? 75 million? 100 million? Lib/dem/soc/commies make Hitler, Stalin, and the most bloodthirsty Aztecs look like a bunch of pikers by comparison. Vote them in, and more innocents will be slaughtered in the name of "convenience" and "choice".
- Eminent Domain: Your land, your property, is at risk if lib/dem/soc/commies get into power. David Souter (see above) basically threw out the concept of private land ownership, if a local municipality can get more TAX revenue from a private concern from your property. Which was NEVER the purpose of eminent domain. Until lib/dem/soc/commies got a hold of it.
- Marriage: In the lib/dem/soc/commie "if it feels good, do it" world, you'll see homosexual marriage given Congressional (if not Constitutional) approval. Over six thousand years of history and tradition (not to mention a few billion years of biology) just chucked away to create a "right" that never was. Marriage and families have already been fornicated up enough by lib/dem/soc/commies over the past half-century. The Founding Fathers never dreamed they'd even have to say that marriage is only between one adult human male and one adult human female. Do you want same-sex "marriage" to become acceptable under law? How about polygamy and polyandry? Want to see children married to adults (and given a "Webb Kiss")? Have you been hankering to tie the knot with Enriqué the Love Goat? Because once one limit falls, the others will topple soon afterward.
- Religion: Christianity has suffered significant erosion in the public domain thanks to lib/dem/soc/commie legislation and activists over the past few decades. Fortunately, there has been a backlash due to strong rep/con/tair action to fight this assault on the First Amendment (you know, the one that guarantees free expression of religion as well as speech?). All of those gains will be lost, as will more and more of your rights to your faith -- unless that faith is atheism, witchcraft or Islamofascism. Moreover, if that last one takes hold thanks to the (dis)loyal opposition of the lib/dem/soc/commies, forget about the right to hold ANY other beliefs.
If you withhold your vote on Tuesday, you might send a signal to Bush. However, you will most certainly send a message to our enemies. The wrong message. Oh, you'll make the Republican Party "pay" for not toeing the conservative line. The problem is that ALL of America, indeed all of the free world, will pay as well.
It won't be your nose that you're cutting off to spite your face.
It'll be your head.
Is your revenge toward the Republican Party worth your freedom?
Your future?
Your life?
Vote.
About the Writer: Doc Farmer is a writer and humorist who is also a moderator on ChronWatch's Forum. He formerly lived in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, but now resides in the Midwest. Doc receives e-mail at docfarmer9999@yahoo.co.uk.
This Article Was First Published In ChronWatch At: http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=24834
TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006; abortion; alien; border; carter; clinton; court; democrat; democrats; dhimmicrats; domain; election; election2006; elections; eminent; gay; hillary; homosexual; house; ifnotnowwhen; illegal; immigration; intelligence; iran; iraq; islam; islamofascism; israel; jefferson; judge; kennedy; kerry; korea; marriage; murtha; muslim; nations; nuclear; nuke; pelosi; polyandry; polygamy; preaching2thechoir; reid; religion; republican; scotus; senate; shadowparty; sorocrats; supreme; terror; un; united; unitednations; vote; votegop; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Valin
Serious response, Get a clue, we WILL lose this war if our borders remain unsecured. The OBL is bipartisan, does that include you?
41
posted on
11/06/2006 7:05:22 AM PST
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
To: Kimberly GG
" I wasnt speaking in reference to taxes."
That's why I brought it up! It is CRITICAL that the Bush tax plan is not interrupted!
" Voting is tomorrow. "
I voted early 8 days ago. So, if you're not gonna vote Republican, WHO are you gonna vote for?
42
posted on
11/06/2006 7:21:17 AM PST
by
MAWG
To: MAWG
Never said or implied that I wasn't voting Republican, but for anyone who might assume so, based on my position regarding national security, would be quite telling, wouldn't it, especially since my position appears to be stronger than that of our Republican president.
And, I imagine your screeching about the priority of taxes would become foolish should we loose the WOT because Bush has refused and failed to effectively secure our borders since 9/12.
43
posted on
11/06/2006 7:42:04 AM PST
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
To: Kimberly GG
" Screeching? "
You sound like one of those hysterical Demonrats constantly preaching doom and gloom. And you still haven't answered the question, Who are you gonna vote for tomorrow, that is if you vote at all. I pulled a str8 Rep. ticket 8 days ago.
44
posted on
11/06/2006 7:48:40 AM PST
by
MAWG
To: Kimberly GG
Take a hike to DU.
Bush haters are not welcomed here.
Nor will be they be welcome in person after this election.
45
posted on
11/06/2006 8:15:59 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
To: MAWG
Yes, I plan to make a two hour trip in order to vote.
And I hardly sound like a democrat, unlike Bush who has joined forces with them on the illegal issue and divided the party over it. Bush has been preaching daily, and rightly so, about the doom and gloom that will result if Dims are allowed to withdraw funding for Iraq. It's why I worked my azz off to defeat Kerry and if securing our border in order to win the WOT, is my priority for a R vote, over your R vote for tax cuts, so be it.
46
posted on
11/06/2006 8:23:47 AM PST
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
To: DocFarmer
Also, don't forget the right to own guns.
47
posted on
11/06/2006 8:38:53 AM PST
by
stbdside
To: Kimberly GG
Right! And Nancy Pelosi and the democrats are really going to take care of the border.
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
48
posted on
11/06/2006 8:44:38 AM PST
by
Valin
(http://www.irey.com/)
To: Kimberly GG
Answer the question. Who are you voting for?
49
posted on
11/06/2006 9:33:34 AM PST
by
MAWG
To: MAWG
Read my post. I said Republican.
50
posted on
11/06/2006 10:50:38 AM PST
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
To: DocFarmer
51
posted on
11/06/2006 12:48:56 PM PST
by
EdReform
(The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed -- * NRA * -- * JPFO *)
To: Kimberly GG
I plan to vote.
But come Wednesday, you better believe I'll be doing everything I can to help STOP the Open Borders Lobby intent on destroying the sovereignty and security of this country.
I'm not waiting until Wednesday. I've been fighting that fight for months! And I'll continue to do so. However, while I disagree with Dubya's actions, we have to at least tip our hats to the rep/con/tairs in the House, who took care of SECURITY FIRST!
To: RatsDawg
you should add Obama to that list, for being a currupt Illinois Democrat.
What, there's such a thing as a NON-corrupt Illinois lib/dem/soc/commie?
I didn't include him because while he's the flavour of the month in the media, he's got no track record and has only been in the Senate for, what, two years now? He's of no consequence in this election.
To: 13Sisters76
Many thanks. Pass it along. If you want a formatted copy of the article, e-Mail me and I'll send it to you. Thanks again.
To: Zeroisanumber
BOO! Scared ya! Now go vote GOP!!The thought of Bela Pelosi being 3rd in line to be President OUGHT to scare anyone!
Now go vote GOP!!!!
55
posted on
11/06/2006 1:24:29 PM PST
by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: Tokra
Bela Pelosi.
I've got to remember that one... [insert cheeky grin here]
To: DocFarmer
Jeez---that's alot to read. All you had to do with a headline like that was post a pic of Pelosi and Hillary......
57
posted on
11/06/2006 1:39:25 PM PST
by
Fawn
(NEVER GO TO 'APPLIANCE KING' IN BOCA RATON FLORIDA--THEY SCAM YOU!!!)
To: DocFarmer
"I'm not waiting until Wednesday. I've been fighting that fight for months! And I'll continue to do so. However, while I disagree with Dubya's actions, we have to at least tip our hats to the rep/con/tairs in the House, who took care of SECURITY FIRST!"
Agreed, absolutely!
58
posted on
11/06/2006 1:41:30 PM PST
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
To: Fawn
Jeez---that's alot to read. All you had to do with a headline like that was post a pic of Pelosi and Hillary......
True.
However, if I tried it your way, all that would have happened would be a whole lot of people barfing all over their keyboards.
I figured this would be tidier...
To: Kimberly GG
The 'get out and voters' are tap dancing as fast as they can and have only Bush to blame, which they rarely do, for joining the left on this issue and purposefully refusing to secure our borders in spite of 9/11, because his OBL agenda is more important than the sovereignty of our country. Had he opposed earned amnesty and militarized the border on 9/12, the party would have remained united and the Republican national security advantage in tact. Instead, his rah rah rahing about doing everything in his power to secure the country, flies in the face of reality.I concur.
Deserves repeating...
60
posted on
11/06/2006 2:50:33 PM PST
by
Rudder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson