Posted on 11/02/2006 4:55:43 PM PST by letsgonova19087
NYT PLANS EXCLUSIVE STORY ON IRAQ AND RESEARCH OF NUKE BOMB... NEWSROOM SOURCE TELLS DRUDGE: 'IT WILL LEAD THE PAPER ON FRIDAY... IT SHOULD IGNITE NEWS CYCLES'... DEVELOPING...
Prost terug bij u!
Its all part of a sting op by the Pentagon; they created this super-duper top secret story on nukes and Iraq, gave it to a few individuals so they could track down the leaker. HA!!!
Something tells me that this may be an Al QaQaa story: "Plutonium Went to Syria: Bush Is Incompetent". Just a hunch...".
Larry Johnson
That would be a story in itself - the Administration forcing the NYT to publish a story. They wouldn't go along, but they would publish a story about the threat.
I don't see that happening. It wouldn't be smart for the Administration, and it wouldn't work anyway.
They're going to bash Bush. The Times is going to take some old news, add in some "whistleblower" that should have spoken out years ago if he really had anything, and make it tomorrow's headline story.
Now THAT would be great!
I have been hoping and expecting the "flop" of cards in October from the WH....What better place to put it than the NY Times who hates Bush...It also means "They" cant ignore it...I hope I am right
Proof of nukes in Iraq would be nice.... and maybe we do have Osama in the WH basement
You may be correct, but do not they prove then that Saddam had a nuclear program and President Bush was right in taking him out? I think so.
Simple, They will expose that Our Troops did find Iraqi Nukes and That President Bush secretly has hidden that from the American public since the invasion.
Expect a lengthy diatribe on how President Bush betrayed the public trust by not telling the country that Saddam did indeed have nuclear weapons and that some of those weapons were transfered into Al Queda's hands just before the invasion and are presently unaccounted for.
Followed by of course if we hadn't invaded Iraq, Saddam never would have given Al Queda the nukes it needed to launch a nuclear attack against us at will.
The summary will of course call for the immediate impeachment of the President.
This is an orchestrated "leak" or more likely release of classified docs...timing timing
If Saddam did have nukes, they would almost surely have had Russian markings on them. If not Russian, then what? French?
My first reaction was hopeful optimism. EVEN seeing the NYT mentioned. If a story was REALLY big, I could see sources in the WH giving the Times' the story.
I`ll place my bet,
PROPAGANDA HIT PIECE FOR THE DEMOCRATS.
That is a good theory. The Slimes could release it 4 days before the elction in the hopes that the voters will not soon enough recognize the cognitive dissonance involved in believing that Saddam did not have WMD, on the one hand, and that Saddam passed WMD to Al Queda, on the other.
Yeah, under the fold on page A22
Second your assessment. These weasels learned to implement better timing in order to take any momentum out.
Brace yourselves this could be a sucky unproductive weekend thanks to the DNC prison bitches at the NYT-
It can be nothing but that. The press will go crazy like the DUI. I will royally piss folks like me off.
jveritas Has translated documents that hint at a nuclear device test as well as the burial of slave labor victims involved in the test, if I remember correctly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.