Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Research discovers oldest bee, evolutionary link
Eurekalert ^ | 25-Oct-2006 | David Stauth

Posted on 10/26/2006 3:17:58 PM PDT by Boxen

CORVALLIS, Ore. -- Researchers at Oregon State University have discovered the oldest bee ever known, a 100 million year old specimen preserved in almost lifelike form in amber, and an important link to help explain the rapid expansion of flowering plants during that distant period.

The findings and their evolutionary significance are outlined in an article to be published this week in the journal Science.

The specimen, at least 35-45 million years older than any other known bee fossil, has given rise to a newly-named family called Melittosphecidae – insects that share some of the features of both bees and wasps. It supports the theory that pollen-dependent bees evolved from their meat-eating predecessors, the wasps.

"This is the oldest known bee we've ever been able to identify, and it shares some of the features of wasps," said George Poinar, a professor of zoology at OSU and international expert in the study of life forms preserved in ancient amber. "But overall it's more bee than wasp, and gives us a pretty good idea of when these two types of insects were separating on their evolutionary paths."

Just as important, Poinar said, the discovery points to the mechanism that could have allowed for the rapid expansion and diversity of flowering plants around that time – the "angiosperms" that depend on some mechanism other than wind to spread their seeds. Prior to that, the world was dominated by "gymnosperms," largely conifer trees, which used wind for pollination and re-seeding.

These changes took place during the Cretaceous Period, which lasted from 65.5 million to 145.5 million years ago. The earliest angiosperms didn't really begin to spread rapidly until a little over 100 millions years ago, a time that appears to correspond with the evolution of bees seen in the new fossil.

"Flowering plants are very important in the evolution of life," Poinar said. "They can reproduce more quickly, develop more genetic diversity, spread more easily and move into new habitats. But prior to the evolution of bees they didn't have any strong mechanism to spread their pollen, only a few flies and beetles that didn't go very far."

The amber specimen Poinar studied, which came from a mine in the Hukawng Valley of northern Myanmar, has certain features that resemble wasps, such as a double spine on the middle tibia and narrow hind legs. But it also has branched hairs all over its body and other key features characteristic of pollen-spreading bees. This species, named Melittosphex burmensis, is long extinct.

"In archaeology, a lot of people look at the species Archaeopteryx, which is believed to be the first bird and was sort of half-bird, half-reptile," Poinar said. "Species such as that can be critically important in helping us to understand when evolution went in different directions. In that sense, this fossil may help us understand when wasps, which were mostly just meat-eating carnivores, turned into bees that could pollinate plants and serve a completely different biological function."

Flowering plants, among other things, account for practically all of the food plants on Earth and much of the food supply for humans and many other animal species. There are now about 20,000 species of bees, which use pollen to feed their young, and over millions of years they have created numerous physical and behavioral adaptations to make them some of Earth's most effective pollinators.

Considering its age, the bee specimen itself is in remarkable condition, showing individual hairs on undamaged portions of its thorax, legs, abdomen and head. The legs and wings are clearly visible. It's a very small bee, consistent with evidence that some of the earliest Cretaceous flowers were also quite small.

Insects trapped in amber, researchers say, often provide some of the most vivid and lifelike glimpses into the distant past. Amber is a semi-precious stone that begins as tree sap, which can ooze down and trap insects or other small things, then ultimately fossilize. It's also a natural embalming agent that can protect and display specimens in nearly perfect, three-dimensional form millions of years later.

This phenomenon has been invaluable in scientific and ecological research, and among other things, formed the scientific premise in the movie Jurassic Park, for the "dinosaur DNA" found in mosquitoes. Poinar, one of the world's experts in the study of amber, also has used it to provide a vivid re-creation of an ancient forest in the book "The Amber Forest: A Reconstruction of a Vanished World." ###

By David Stauth, 541-737-0787

Editor's Note: A digital color image of the bee in the amber fossil that is the basis of this research can be obtained on the web at http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ncs/photos.html#act


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amberalert; angryhungryjunior; bee; bloodbath; crevolist; evofetish; gottagetgrants; juniordroolbib; junkscience; melittlefraudinneed; speculation; wasp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Jaysun
So geologist aren't scientist?

Everybody is a specialist. I would not trust a heart surgeon to fix my household plumbing.

41 posted on 10/26/2006 5:40:46 PM PDT by null and void (Age and experience -- It makes no sense to get one without the other. - Sundog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Everybody is a specialist. I would not trust a heart surgeon to fix my household plumbing.

Another brilliant comment by null and void. Somehow you equate one that studies rocks and then comments on them to someone that studies the workings of the human heart and comments on toilets or faucets. Geologist are qualified to study fossils, until of course, they're proven frauds. Ridiculous. Oh, but thanks.
42 posted on 10/26/2006 5:44:30 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun; jennyp

Singles and plurals ping...


43 posted on 10/26/2006 5:51:32 PM PDT by null and void (Age and experience -- It makes no sense to get one without the other. - Sundog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
A heart surgeon's skill set includes lots of understanding of fluid flow, valve function and pumping principles. On the face of it these are the same skills a plumber needs, yet the practical applications of the two skill sets are quite different.

In the same way a geologist understands the way rocks go together, but may not understand the way skeletons go together.

Do you need everything explained in such excruciating detail?

44 posted on 10/26/2006 5:58:23 PM PDT by null and void (Age and experience -- It makes no sense to get one without the other. - Sundog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: null and void
In the same way a geologist understands the way rocks go together, but may not understand the way skeletons go together.

Do you need everything explained in such excruciating detail?


Not at all. It isn't me that buys their bullsh*t. But I wonder how long one needs to go to school to become an evolutionologist? Is there such a thing? Are does everyone take the word from the likes of geologist? Surely not. (Careful how you answer, genius).
45 posted on 10/26/2006 6:08:47 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
If I wanted to know where to drill for oil or water, I'd call a geologist (or maybe a dowser?)

If I wanted to put bones together I'd call a paleontologist (or maybe a forensics investigator)

Would I take advice from the bricklayer? Absolutely, for advice about bricks, not about jewels...
46 posted on 10/26/2006 6:14:13 PM PDT by null and void (Age and experience -- It makes no sense to get one without the other. - Sundog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Okay. I'll make note of that. Geologist aren't qualified to fill in the evolution gaps. Thanks.


47 posted on 10/26/2006 6:16:53 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
But I wonder how long one needs to go to school to become an evolutionologist? Is there such a thing?

There are many different fields which study evolution.

I did six years of grad school, with half of my time spent studying physical anthropology (fossil man, human osteology, and related subjects).

There are a lot of other specialties as well, but I don't know what their courses of study are.

48 posted on 10/26/2006 6:21:02 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
But I wonder how long one needs to go to school to become an evolutionologist?

OTOH, Bible school is a snap, there's only the one Book to study...

49 posted on 10/26/2006 6:26:00 PM PDT by null and void (Age and experience -- It makes no sense to get one without the other. - Sundog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: null and void
OTOH, Bible school is a snap, there's only the one Book to study...

Religion and Science. Two different animals. Thanks anyway. Talk to someone else about it.
50 posted on 10/26/2006 6:29:33 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

> 100 million year old

Impossible, insane. Think about anything physical on earth lasting that long. This is a total joke.


51 posted on 10/26/2006 6:34:06 PM PDT by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior

> There are a number of dating methods used to date these finds

Explain the one used on this piece of amber.


52 posted on 10/26/2006 6:35:52 PM PDT by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Junior

You should move on. You're way to smart for us here. We actually find sarcasm fun. Try it if you can lower yourself that much.


53 posted on 10/26/2006 6:35:55 PM PDT by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
Religion and Science. Two different animals.

I think not. More like two sides of the same coin. The 'where do we fit in the scheme of things' coin.

When I read my Bible it specifically says that things were created in a certain order.

Starting with the chaos of the big bang
Moving on to the point where light came into being
Then solid matter condensed from the 'liquid' plasma.
The solids and fluids were gathered and separated
Plants came into being
Then swimming creatures
Then (dinosaurs which became) birds
Then mammals
And finally, that Johnny come lately, Man

Pretty much the same sequence that Physics and TOE have.

The main difference between the stories the Bible and Modern Science tell is the timescale. I don't know how long one of God's days is, but I do note that the Seventh Day doesn't end with "And the evening and the morning were the nth day" like days 1-6.

I assert that we are still in the Seventh Day as the Bible never says it ended...

And the Bible deals with what and why, while Modern Science deals with what and how

54 posted on 10/26/2006 7:04:40 PM PDT by null and void (Age and experience -- It makes no sense to get one without the other. - Sundog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Super. See ya.


55 posted on 10/26/2006 7:06:50 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: All
"EVOFETISH; GOTTAGETGRANTS; JUNIORDROOLBIB; JUNKSCIENCE; MELITTLEFRAUDINNEED;

To the coward spamming keywords:

Who needs logical and argument, right? You've got insults. I'm ashamed to even be a witness to such behavior. You disgust me. If you've any honor left, you will ask the Moderator to clean up your indecency.
56 posted on 10/26/2006 8:48:17 PM PDT by Boxen (Branigan's law is like Branigan's love--Hard and fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

logic, I meant "logic"


57 posted on 10/26/2006 8:55:38 PM PDT by Boxen (Branigan's law is like Branigan's love--Hard and fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Junior
That way, next time you spout off at least you might know something about which you speak.

I use the same procedure that evo scientists do. Eeny Meeny Miny Moe....

58 posted on 10/26/2006 10:09:26 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: old-ager
It was encased in amber which is a ROCK...and rocks can be hundreds of millions of years old. Why is this so unbelievable?
59 posted on 10/26/2006 10:45:51 PM PDT by miliantnutcase ("If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it." -ichabod1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: null and void
OTOH, Bible school is a snap, there's only the one Book to study...

That's true (or is it 60 some books), but the trouble is they're in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic

60 posted on 10/27/2006 12:04:08 AM PDT by Virginia-American (Don't bring a comic book to an encyclopedia fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson