Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Research discovers oldest bee, evolutionary link
Eurekalert ^ | 25-Oct-2006 | David Stauth

Posted on 10/26/2006 3:17:58 PM PDT by Boxen

CORVALLIS, Ore. -- Researchers at Oregon State University have discovered the oldest bee ever known, a 100 million year old specimen preserved in almost lifelike form in amber, and an important link to help explain the rapid expansion of flowering plants during that distant period.

The findings and their evolutionary significance are outlined in an article to be published this week in the journal Science.

The specimen, at least 35-45 million years older than any other known bee fossil, has given rise to a newly-named family called Melittosphecidae – insects that share some of the features of both bees and wasps. It supports the theory that pollen-dependent bees evolved from their meat-eating predecessors, the wasps.

"This is the oldest known bee we've ever been able to identify, and it shares some of the features of wasps," said George Poinar, a professor of zoology at OSU and international expert in the study of life forms preserved in ancient amber. "But overall it's more bee than wasp, and gives us a pretty good idea of when these two types of insects were separating on their evolutionary paths."

Just as important, Poinar said, the discovery points to the mechanism that could have allowed for the rapid expansion and diversity of flowering plants around that time – the "angiosperms" that depend on some mechanism other than wind to spread their seeds. Prior to that, the world was dominated by "gymnosperms," largely conifer trees, which used wind for pollination and re-seeding.

These changes took place during the Cretaceous Period, which lasted from 65.5 million to 145.5 million years ago. The earliest angiosperms didn't really begin to spread rapidly until a little over 100 millions years ago, a time that appears to correspond with the evolution of bees seen in the new fossil.

"Flowering plants are very important in the evolution of life," Poinar said. "They can reproduce more quickly, develop more genetic diversity, spread more easily and move into new habitats. But prior to the evolution of bees they didn't have any strong mechanism to spread their pollen, only a few flies and beetles that didn't go very far."

The amber specimen Poinar studied, which came from a mine in the Hukawng Valley of northern Myanmar, has certain features that resemble wasps, such as a double spine on the middle tibia and narrow hind legs. But it also has branched hairs all over its body and other key features characteristic of pollen-spreading bees. This species, named Melittosphex burmensis, is long extinct.

"In archaeology, a lot of people look at the species Archaeopteryx, which is believed to be the first bird and was sort of half-bird, half-reptile," Poinar said. "Species such as that can be critically important in helping us to understand when evolution went in different directions. In that sense, this fossil may help us understand when wasps, which were mostly just meat-eating carnivores, turned into bees that could pollinate plants and serve a completely different biological function."

Flowering plants, among other things, account for practically all of the food plants on Earth and much of the food supply for humans and many other animal species. There are now about 20,000 species of bees, which use pollen to feed their young, and over millions of years they have created numerous physical and behavioral adaptations to make them some of Earth's most effective pollinators.

Considering its age, the bee specimen itself is in remarkable condition, showing individual hairs on undamaged portions of its thorax, legs, abdomen and head. The legs and wings are clearly visible. It's a very small bee, consistent with evidence that some of the earliest Cretaceous flowers were also quite small.

Insects trapped in amber, researchers say, often provide some of the most vivid and lifelike glimpses into the distant past. Amber is a semi-precious stone that begins as tree sap, which can ooze down and trap insects or other small things, then ultimately fossilize. It's also a natural embalming agent that can protect and display specimens in nearly perfect, three-dimensional form millions of years later.

This phenomenon has been invaluable in scientific and ecological research, and among other things, formed the scientific premise in the movie Jurassic Park, for the "dinosaur DNA" found in mosquitoes. Poinar, one of the world's experts in the study of amber, also has used it to provide a vivid re-creation of an ancient forest in the book "The Amber Forest: A Reconstruction of a Vanished World." ###

By David Stauth, 541-737-0787

Editor's Note: A digital color image of the bee in the amber fossil that is the basis of this research can be obtained on the web at http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ncs/photos.html#act


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amberalert; angryhungryjunior; bee; bloodbath; crevolist; evofetish; gottagetgrants; juniordroolbib; junkscience; melittlefraudinneed; speculation; wasp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
And here's the photograph:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us


1 posted on 10/26/2006 3:17:59 PM PDT by Boxen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Boxen; LibertarianInExile; JoeSixPack1; Joe 6-pack; hispanarepublicana; yoe; Yaelle; writer33; ...

So, all the buzz about?


2 posted on 10/26/2006 3:29:07 PM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

Cool!


3 posted on 10/26/2006 3:31:43 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boxen
100 million years ago? Why are there still bees then? Or worms? Or single-cell amoebas? Shouldn't they have evolved into birds, or dogs, or elephants, or whatever by now? It's all nonsense.
4 posted on 10/26/2006 3:34:54 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

Very cool.


5 posted on 10/26/2006 3:40:38 PM PDT by MonroeDNA (Love God, despise religeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

What's yellow and black, and goes zub-zub-zub?

A 100 million year old bee flying backwards.


6 posted on 10/26/2006 3:48:05 PM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boxen
The specimen, at least 35-45 million years older than any other known bee fossil

You ever wonder how they come up with these numbers? Do they sit at a table having coffee and say I think it should be "x" years and then they have a vote?

7 posted on 10/26/2006 3:55:57 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

Fascinating stuff.. great post!


8 posted on 10/26/2006 3:58:33 PM PDT by somniferum (Annoy a liberal.. Work hard and be happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
100 million years ago? Why are there still bees then? Or worms? Or single-cell amoebas? Shouldn't they have evolved into birds, or dogs, or elephants, or whatever by now? It's all nonsense.

You had me going for a minute there. You really ought to include a /sarcasm tag, otherwise folks will get the idea you're a complete idiot.

9 posted on 10/26/2006 4:02:29 PM PDT by Junior (Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
You ever wonder how they come up with these numbers? Do they sit at a table having coffee and say I think it should be "x" years and then they have a vote?

There are a number of dating methods used to date these finds -- each accurate to a greater or lesser degree. We'll have to read the paper to determine the methods used (they usually use more than one to eliminate any errors).

Instead of being sarcastic, you might do a little research on dating methods. That way, next time you spout off at least you might know something about which you speak.

10 posted on 10/26/2006 4:07:08 PM PDT by Junior (Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Junior
You had me going for a minute there. You really ought to include a /sarcasm tag, otherwise folks will get the idea you're a complete idiot.

Right Junior. Only "smart" folks allow "scientist" to build complete skeletons out of a single pig's tooth or a skullcap and call it "intelligent" or "proof". You can kiss my tail-fin, sir.

By the way, you forgot to answer the question. Why are there still worms? Moths? Fish? Turtles? Birds? Monkeys? Frogs? After all, didn't they have to "evolve" to survive?
11 posted on 10/26/2006 4:11:13 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
By the way, you forgot to answer the question. Why are there still worms? Moths? Fish? Turtles? Birds? Monkeys? Frogs? After all, didn't they have to "evolve" to survive?

That's a simple question to answer. The answer is the same as this question: Why, if Americans are largely descended from Europeans, are there still Europeans?

The two groups split, and each went its own way.

At the point where our ancestors split from the apes, they stayed in the forests while our ancestors expanded (or were pushed) into the grasslands. From there the two groups diverged, with the ape line changing little (as they were already well-adapted) and the grassland group (us) changing considerably to meet the new conditions.

12 posted on 10/26/2006 4:25:03 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
That's a simple question to answer. The answer is the same as this question: Why, if Americans are largely descended from Europeans, are there still Europeans? The two groups split, and each went its own way.

At the point where our ancestors split from the apes, they stayed in the forests while our ancestors expanded (or were pushed) into the grasslands. From there the two groups diverged, with the ape line changing little (as they were already well-adapted) and the grassland group (us) changing considerably to meet the new conditions.

No. Worms, fish, turtles, birds, giraffes. We're talking apples and oranges here (which, by the way must have come from fish - or is it apes). No, you're trying to dodge the question. Europeans and Americans are very much alike. Americans and worms are very different than say, Europeans and dirt. Thanks for reply, but it doesn't hold muster.
13 posted on 10/26/2006 4:33:46 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

Biggest bug I ever saw was a praying mantis. Must have been a foot tall, green. When it took off it flew right at me and I had to duck.


14 posted on 10/26/2006 4:37:15 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
Which scientist built a complete skeleton from a skullcap or pig's tooth. Be specific now, as we wouldn't want folks to think you were just making stuff up.

As for why there are still worms, etc., those critters are specifically adapted for their particular ecological niches. Part of evolution is adaptation to an environment.

15 posted on 10/26/2006 4:42:46 PM PDT by Junior (Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Junior
As for why there are still worms, etc., those critters are specifically adapted for their particular ecological niches. Part of evolution is adaptation to an environment.

That part is stupid on its face. Why aren't worms secluded to the one place that they could survive? And if they could survive anywhere, why evolve? As to the other part, give me a minute.....
16 posted on 10/26/2006 4:45:34 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
No. Worms, fish, turtles, birds, giraffes. We're talking apples and oranges here (which, by the way must have come from fish - or is it apes). No, you're trying to dodge the question. Europeans and Americans are very much alike. Americans and worms are very different than say, Europeans and dirt. Thanks for reply, but it doesn't hold muster.

I am not trying to dodge the question, because it is the same. My training happens to be more in the fields of fossil man and bones than worms and turtles, so that is what I used in my answer.

(My guess from the tone of your questions is that you don't agree with evolution for some reason. I don't think you really want an answer to your question.)

17 posted on 10/26/2006 4:49:24 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Which scientist built a complete skeleton from a skullcap or pig's tooth. Be specific now, as we wouldn't want folks to think you were just making stuff up.

Pigs tooth = "Nebraska man".

Skullcap = "Java man", initially discovered by Eugene Dubois, a Dutchman, in 1891.
18 posted on 10/26/2006 4:50:00 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
I am not trying to dodge the question, because it is the same. My training happens to be more in the fields of fossil man and bones than worms and turtles, so that is what I used in my answer.

Sir, Europeans and Americans are the same species. We can, and often do, breed. Can you not see the difference between that and say, birds and butterflies (both of which fly and sometimes display beautiful colors)?
19 posted on 10/26/2006 4:51:48 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
Worms aren't everywhere, though they are in a lot of environments. Note that not all worms are identical. There are 5500 species of earthworms in the world alone. There are dozens of other types of worms, with thousands of different species, inhabiting environments ranging from the sea floor to the leaf mould of northern forests. And each of those species is specifically adapted for its environment.
20 posted on 10/26/2006 4:54:32 PM PDT by Junior (Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson