To: Jaysun
By the way, you forgot to answer the question. Why are there still worms? Moths? Fish? Turtles? Birds? Monkeys? Frogs? After all, didn't they have to "evolve" to survive? That's a simple question to answer. The answer is the same as this question: Why, if Americans are largely descended from Europeans, are there still Europeans?
The two groups split, and each went its own way.
At the point where our ancestors split from the apes, they stayed in the forests while our ancestors expanded (or were pushed) into the grasslands. From there the two groups diverged, with the ape line changing little (as they were already well-adapted) and the grassland group (us) changing considerably to meet the new conditions.
12 posted on
10/26/2006 4:25:03 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Coyoteman
That's a simple question to answer. The answer is the same as this question: Why, if Americans are largely descended from Europeans, are there still Europeans? The two groups split, and each went its own way.
At the point where our ancestors split from the apes, they stayed in the forests while our ancestors expanded (or were pushed) into the grasslands. From there the two groups diverged, with the ape line changing little (as they were already well-adapted) and the grassland group (us) changing considerably to meet the new conditions.
No. Worms, fish, turtles, birds, giraffes. We're talking apples and oranges here (which, by the way must have come from fish - or is it apes). No, you're trying to dodge the question. Europeans and Americans are very much alike. Americans and worms are very different than say, Europeans and dirt. Thanks for reply, but it doesn't hold muster.
13 posted on
10/26/2006 4:33:46 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson