Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Spend In Key Races, But GOP Maintains Money Edge
Investor's Business Daily ^ | 23 October 2006 | JED GRAHAM

Posted on 10/23/2006 7:55:23 AM PDT by shrinkermd

Democratic strategists, seeing this election as the best opportunity for the party since the 1974 post-Watergate blowout, are urging party leaders to go for broke.

James Carville called it a “twicein-a-lifetime environment” that could give Democrats “gains large enough to affect congressional control over this decade.”

The Democratic National Committee has already said it is taking out a loan of up to $10 million to plow into hot Senate races in Tennessee, Virginia and New Jersey. And the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee wrote checks for at least $12 million last week, primarily for ad buys targeting 30 at-risk Republican districts and just four Democratic districts that need shoring up.

Of that $12 million, nearly half was spent against three Pennsylvania Republicans — Jim Gerlach, Curt Weldon and Mike Fitzpatrick. They represent districts in suburban Philadelphia that supported Sen. John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election...

(Excerpt) Read more at epaper.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aintnorealcajun; democrats; demorats; election; madcajun; money; partyofjackasses; raginlunatic; treason
As the author reports it, GOP is still able to out spend the RATS.
1 posted on 10/23/2006 7:55:24 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Here's hoping the 'rats go into MAJOR debt in this campaign and STILL don't get control of the Congress!!!

That'll put a big smile on my mug on the morning of 8 November.

2 posted on 10/23/2006 7:57:00 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Quote: "James Carville called it a “twicein-a-lifetime environment” that could give Democrats “gains large enough to affect congressional control over this decade.”

Bull crap. If the dems win, it will be by bare majorities. Ole snake head is up to his usual nuttiness. Or, perhaps not. If the dems go for broke and go broke, that could well position a well financed Hillary Clinton (like it or not, she and the Slick One can raise cash) to be the perceived saviors of the democrat party. At any rate, I sense another egg in the face moment for Mr. Carville.


3 posted on 10/23/2006 8:00:08 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

If the Dems lose, defined as not get control of anything, that will be the end of them. The Dem party will start crumbling - and not even Slick Willy will be able to put them back together.


4 posted on 10/23/2006 8:04:44 AM PDT by farlander (Strategery - sure beats liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: farlander

If money was the answer Lieberman would be losing to Lamont in Connecticut,he has spent 14 million of his own money and is behind by 13 points.
Besides that Lamont is the anti Iraq war candidate and Lieberman supports the president on the war! Go figure


5 posted on 10/23/2006 8:13:05 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: farlander

"If the Dems lose, defined as not get control of anything, that will be the end of them. The Dem party will start crumbling - and not even Slick Willy will be able to put them back together."

On the contrary, it is all about Slick Willie. His coalition wants to take over the DNC and the party. There needs to be a reason. So while Slick Willie is going around doing what he does best(aside from raping women),laying the seeds for a party takeover.

Dems aren't taking either house. They migyht pick up a couple of seats but that is the extent of it.




6 posted on 10/23/2006 8:35:37 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Murtha is even cutting and running from a debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

Ah but the difference is where the money comes from. Grasroots money is more important that personal money. Barron's did their analysis based on the money donated by the folks out there. Those who donate, will go vote, and will also try and influence others to do the same and for the same candidate. Makes sense to me that the candidate that gets more of the $50 donations will do better than a guy spending his own millions, as long as the disparity is not overwhelming.


7 posted on 10/23/2006 8:51:47 AM PDT by farlander (Strategery - sure beats liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

That reminds me -- need to make a contribution.


8 posted on 10/23/2006 9:00:24 AM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (good fences make good neighbors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

The Democratic National Committee has already said it is taking out a loan of up to $10 million...


Hmmm? Didn't the teachers union in Florida borrow money to campaign against the evil Jeb Bush?

How did that work out?

ALSO: I'd like to know what rate you get when you borrow $10 million dollars for political campaigns?


9 posted on 10/23/2006 12:51:00 PM PDT by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

The RATS' tactics during the current campaign motivated me to contribute; otherwise I would probably have passed. Heck, they even motivated me to vote for DeWine.


10 posted on 10/23/2006 3:08:12 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farlander

I agree with that ,my point was Lamont according to the democrats was a sure thing ,he should not have to be spending 2 million dollars more of his personal money with 2 weeks to go before the election,being against the Iraq war like the entire country as you know.
Especially in Connecticut a Liberal state


11 posted on 10/23/2006 3:42:47 PM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson