Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

but a few years ago, a man in charge of State Security Bureau in Yanji City was bribed with $300,000 by N. Korean intelligence, and China's intelligence network inside N. Korea was wiped out overnight (due to information N. Koreans got from him in return.) Since then, China's intelligence network on N. Korea is virtually non-existent.

This is a big news, if true.

1 posted on 10/15/2006 3:13:00 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 10/15/2006 3:13:34 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

It's a real bitch when your pet rat turns around and bites the hand that feeds it....


3 posted on 10/15/2006 3:14:53 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

"The most irritating result is that N. Korea's nuclear weapons may be in effect aimed at China."

Eh, not sure I believe this part.


4 posted on 10/15/2006 3:15:12 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Crap. The little twerp may be smarter than we all thought.


5 posted on 10/15/2006 3:16:38 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Normal people would kill to save their kids. Muslim fascists raise their kids to die killing others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I don't believe it. If true, China would not admit something like that.


7 posted on 10/15/2006 3:24:58 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

China's man in PyongYang ought to check to see if his bribe money is legal tender.


8 posted on 10/15/2006 3:27:57 AM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Where is the report? It's not on the page your link goes too.
10 posted on 10/15/2006 3:33:46 AM PDT by AmeriBrit (Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I wonder, maybe the nuclear test was part of a different ploy. N.Korea fakes a nuclear blast. The results cannot be confirmed by a majority of free nations. Russia steps in after a few days when doubt is building and states that the test was indeed nuclear. The statement leaves us considering that perhaps the blast was nuclear in nature, but on such a small scale that it would not register or be as obvious as a conventional large yield blast would be. The world is partially inclined to listen to Russia and assume that some sort of test took place for a "suitcase nuke".

Russia considers their tails covered and feels they are now free to covertly transport such armaments or the technology to build them as the world is inclined to believe that N. Korea has already produced said armament on it's own. Russia establishes a new client for nuclear technology without directly exposing itself as the provider of said technology. Maybe N. Korea keeps them or sells them to other rogue nations? Their money is still good...

OK, more coffee...

Yet here is another aspect to this. China has the upcoming Olympics to be concerned about. They are pouring loads of national resources into this effort as a showcase for what the nation and the Communist party has achieved. Having a nuclear power lead by a madman on their border simply isn't good for tourism. It could savagely curtail their efforts towards the end of complete and total failure to even get certain major nations to compete or show up, whether they are friendly or not.

Russia might not mind this at all. China is a rival empire, an allie at times, but no less a rival for the most part. So maybe China has a far larger stake in a nuclear N. Korea than they appear to display. This can't be a good thing for China. They can't even convince Kim-illin' to return Chinese trains loaded with relief and supplies some of the time. The N. Koreans keep the trains and use them for state commerce, stating that the trains are part of the relief. Makes the Chinese look very, very weak.

N. Korea's ace in the hole? 20 million starving refugees who would likely storm over the Northern border like ravaging locusts should any internal weakness or along the border be evident. Wouldn't be prudent, no sir. Can't have that happen when you're trying to put on a good face for all the world to see. It would be a humanitarian crisis of unbelievable proportion. Oh, and now the N. Koreans have nukes, too.

Not good for China. Not good for neighboring nations/states that feel they now require nukes in order to maintain a balance of power. China suddenly finds itself within a building nuclear arms race against nations who previously didn't consider them necessary. Particularly Japan.

The Russians sit back and laugh...

Sorry y'all, but the South Park "Urinal Duke" episode really got me on the "conspiracy line" of thought this morning...

12 posted on 10/15/2006 3:40:19 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

How about we agree to give China N.Korea if they leave Taiwan alone.


19 posted on 10/15/2006 4:15:26 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The most irritating result is that N. Korea's nuclear weapons may be in effect aimed at China.

This just hit them, eh? I don't know if North Korea's are aimed at China, but I know the ones we'll help South Korea, Japan and Taiwan will be.
Why do they think Bush kept phrasing the question "Does China want a nuclear free Korean peninsula?"
I guess nuance doesn't translate. Pity.
21 posted on 10/15/2006 4:26:13 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool ("O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends" - Koran 5.51)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Nice story... too bad it's BS.


24 posted on 10/15/2006 4:36:28 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Well, this doesn't make any sense at all.

I read 20 times a day that North Korea is a puppet of China. All the really smart posters say so. Well, I mean, the ones that write a line or two about North Korea being a puppet of China, but don't offer any analysis or understanding of the situation. They write it all the time, so they must be right, right?

Either that, or Kim Jong Il is just annother cunning, backstabbing tyrant who doesn't care what he has to do in order to remain in power. If that's the case, then it would be in his interest to intimidate China in the same way he's intimidating everyone else. The CCP has a lot to lose, and are deathly afraid of serious threats to Chinese stability or economic progress. That would mean that China would much rather block sanctions and pay what in effect is tribute, rather than do the right thing, when it may come at a steep cost.

The DPRK realizes that they're not dealing with Mao Zedong, but a pack of penny pinching bureaucrats. Intimidation a much more effective a tool against a committee of pencil pushers who don't want to rock the boat, than it is a powerful, egotistical revolutionary fighter. China is not in a desperate situation, but North Korea is. That fact makes it in the interest of China to do whatever they can to keep North Korea afloat, because if it collapses, China will have to clean up the mess.

That mess could involve a failed state on their border, with millions of refugees, loose WMDs, marauding former North Korean military units looking for food, and eventually, U.S./USFK forces parked on the Yalu/Heilongjiang river. (That's about a day and a half of M1A1 tank driving to Beijing, closer than Kuwait City is to Baghdad.)

But, North Korea is a puppet of China. I read it here on FR, so it must be true.

31 posted on 10/15/2006 5:48:13 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Yes, big news...if true. But are we supposed to think, Oh, poor China! They were duped! (Nonsense.) This is more Chinese cover your rump and play both ends against the middle time.


34 posted on 10/15/2006 6:37:52 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I don't believe it for a minute...China knows exactly what's going on.


36 posted on 10/15/2006 7:04:01 AM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Let's just keep in mind that everything North Korea is doing now is designed to keep Jong-Il in power. It is all for the Kim family mafia/dictatorship.

They don't really care what China wants or doesn't want. All that matters is keeping the Kim family in power. Sometimes that matches up with what China wants and Chinese interests. Sometimes it doesn't.


43 posted on 10/15/2006 7:23:18 AM PDT by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Sorry Tiger, I think this is dis-information coming out of China's state security apparatus; attempting to reinforce the geopolitical spin that China is really honestly working with U.S. and S.Korea on this issue. I don't buy it.


44 posted on 10/15/2006 7:25:20 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
N. Korea's nuclear weapons may be in effect aimed at China

Some could end up there by acident if N Kor launches its missiles. Fortunately most of what is in range is Manchuria so it wouldn't matter much.

55 posted on 10/15/2006 10:01:43 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Please post your source. There was nothing about this last

night on the link you provided, nor is there anything this

morning.
59 posted on 10/15/2006 10:36:03 AM PDT by AmeriBrit (Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Please post your source. There was nothing about this last

night on the link you provided, nor is there anything this

morning.
60 posted on 10/15/2006 10:36:12 AM PDT by AmeriBrit (Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Please post your source. There was nothing about this last

night on the link you provided, nor is there anything this

morning.
61 posted on 10/15/2006 10:36:26 AM PDT by AmeriBrit (Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson