Skip to comments.House Republicans Wants Democrats to Appear Before Ethics Committee
Posted on 10/06/2006 11:57:43 AM PDT by 300magnum
click here to read article
Do we all think Foley would have been the ONLY critter to hit on the pages, male or female?
I can't believe I just saw the words 'ethics' and 'Democrats' used in the same sentence.
more FYI pings
They will refuse. That will make them look bad. Nice going.
And now the backpedalling by the dems will begin. The cries of "Oh, no! It's just the Republicans who hit on interns. . . er, I mean PAGES!" will start, and Foleygate will fade into the mist, to be replaced by the next contrived "scandal" from the dems' dog-eared playbook.
YES! They want bi-partisanship, by God, make them walk the walk!
Good to see Joe Wilson (my former Congressman from South Carolina) on there. You have no idea how happy I would be to see Joe Wilson take the next step and slap Lindsay Graham out of the Republican nomination for Senate when Graham's seat comes up.
I was thinking the same thing.
I hope that when the Democrats accuse the Republicans of using these hearings for politics, the GOP rams that accusation back down the throats of the Dems.
I will take "an editor that has an understanding of the English language and grammar" for $200.
Good! Let's see how many talking heads are able to say the following:
"Ms. Pelosi, will you swear under oath that you had absolutely no advance knowledge (until released on last Friday afternoon) of the existence and/or nature of the electronic communications between Mr. Foley and the any of pages?"
"Would you be willing to submit to a polygraph test to demonstrate your veracity to the American people?"
"If you had even one day's advance knowledge, why did you hold back on the information if it would possibly endanger the pages in question?"
"Could you explain to the American people your relationship to or knowledge of Robin Katsaros, her son, and/or any projects involving a book about the life of pages in DC?"
[I wrote them out to use in case they couldn't muster the wherewithal to generate the questions themselves ...]
I recall, at some time in the past, one 'critter making a statement about the page program being a "congressional sex smorgasbord".
Not sure of the context but this is ringing a bell. In ay have been in the context of, "We don't want this to be viewed as...".
Anyone else remember? It may have been from the Reynolds scandal.
She will not even acknowledge that she received the letter asking her to appear. It won't be reported in the press either.
Oh, yesss. Let's see Pelosi, under oath, slither her way out of this one. While we're at it, let's get Brian Ross, ABC and the rest of the DBM under oath.
Not really! Pelosi Ligosi refused to approve of FREEH to investigate and the DBM ignored it.
The ETHICS committee will get NO cooperation from the Dims and it will barely be a whisper in the media.
IMHO the results of the ETHICS committee will be nothing more than the GOP falling on it's own sword.......they are masters at self-immolation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.