[rightinthemiddle]

Do we all think Foley would have been the ONLY critter to hit on the pages, male or female?

[BigBobber]

Yipes! The Pubbies are firing back!

Pelosi will not testify. She's in this up to her over stretched forehead.

[Hoodat]

I can't believe I just saw the words 'ethics' and 'Democrats' used in the same sentence.

[Mo1]

more FYI pings

[Bahbah]

They will refuse. That will make them look bad. Nice going.

[My2Cents]

HA ha!

[hsalaw]

And now the backpedalling by the dems will begin. The cries of "Oh, no! It's just the Republicans who hit on interns. . . er, I mean PAGES!" will start, and Foleygate will fade into the mist, to be replaced by the next contrived "scandal" from the dems' dog-eared playbook.

[kcvl]

bttt

[Moose4]

YES! They want bi-partisanship, by God, make them walk the walk!

Good to see Joe Wilson (my former Congressman from South Carolina) on there. You have no idea how happy I would be to see Joe Wilson take the next step and slap Lindsay Graham out of the Republican nomination for Senate when Graham's seat comes up.

}:-)4

[1035rep]

Good deal.

[ARealMothersSonForever]

House Republicans Wants Democrats to Appear Before Ethics Committee

I will take "an editor that has an understanding of the English language and grammar" for $200.

[Tirian]

Good! Let's see how many talking heads are able to say the following:

"Ms. Pelosi, will you swear under oath that you had absolutely no advance knowledge (until released on last Friday afternoon) of the existence and/or nature of the electronic communications between Mr. Foley and the any of pages?"

"Would you be willing to submit to a polygraph test to demonstrate your veracity to the American people?"

"If you had even one day's advance knowledge, why did you hold back on the information if it would possibly endanger the pages in question?"

"Could you explain to the American people your relationship to or knowledge of Robin Katsaros, her son, and/or any projects involving a book about the life of pages in DC?"

[I wrote them out to use in case they couldn't muster the wherewithal to generate the questions themselves ...]

[caisson71]

Oh, yesss. Let's see Pelosi, under oath, slither her way out of this one. While we're at it, let's get Brian Ross, ABC and the rest of the DBM under oath.

[MEGoody]

This is gonna be good. :)

[Excellence]

In addition to Kingston, signatories include Representatives Kay Granger (Tex.), Phil Gingrey (Ga.), Bill Shuster (Pa.), Lee Terry (Neb.), Tom Price (Ga.), Louie Gohmert (Tex.), Joe Wilson (S.C.), Lynn Westmoreland (Ga.), Roger Wicker (Miss.) and John Shadegg (Ariz.).

Republicans with balls.

[Soul Seeker]

Just as it must be determined whether any Republican Members or political operatives were aware of and attempted to conceal Mr. Foley’s activities, it must also be determined whether any Democrat Members or political operatives were aware of, and attempted to conceal these same activities.

Nancy doesn't want a Congressional investigational about this led by Clinto former FBI chief Freeh. She doesn't want a polygraph. She doesn't want to be sworn to testimony. What do you want to bet she doesn't want this either? Smells like a coverup to me Nancy.

Nancy probably will refuse, and with that refusal Reps have them nailed. They can run ads stating we got rid of Foley the minute we had IM's. But Dems may have had them and did nothing. Rather then clearing the air, they refuse to submit to a bi-partisan investigation to get to the root of this. What did Dems know and when did they know it?

[FlingWingFlyer]

The question I'd like to see the Commie 'RATS have to answer is, why are they reacting hysterically over this Foley fiasco when they gave Gary Studds three "standing Os" for actually engaging in homosexual acts with "under-aged" pages. The 'RATS have taken hypocricy to a whole new level with their new Foley "scandal."

[Darkwolf377]

If it takes a scare about re-election to get the Republicans to fight back for a change, I'll take it.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

We need to get to the bottom of who knew about Mr. Foley's inexcusable actions, when did they know about it, when did they first become aware of the Instant Messages in question, and what did they do with that information.

OK Related thread:

FOLEY EMAILS WERE ALTERED?

Good stuff on this thread....

Other threads.....:

Hastert: Scandal Is 'October Surprise'

**********************************

Foley Setup? - Part XIV - Putting it together

*********************************

Foleygate May Turn Into CREWgate

******************************

The CREW Emails - Many Discrepencies!

*****************************************

The Foley set-up starts to break open

[Logical me]

So far I've heard nothing in the news media. The Ethics Committee must get the message out. It will be hard, but unless the Ethics Committee use subpoena power, they will not appear.