I believe this was the guy you were trying to post.
He may have been, it's just I didn't see it.
Posted on 10/05/2006 1:26:28 PM PDT by pulaskibush
I worked in the Istook Campaign in Oklahoma City. One of my co-workers was Jordan Edmund. I actually didn't get to know him all that well, but everything I saw and heard about him indicated that he was not gay. He basically behaved like your standard frat boy. His facebook account no longer exist. If he was part of some prank, I didn't know about it. Jordan came from CA long before I arrived and was there when I left. Jordan was a hard worker and didn't loose his temper or anything like that. He mainly talked about Berkley and seemed to be easy going. He does seem like the kind of guy that would pull a prank.
I have no beef with him or the Istook Campaign. I believe that Istook would be a much better Governor than Brad Henry, especially on the issue of illegal immigration. Henry signed an in-state tuition for illegals law while Istook has been fighting against illegal immigration as a Congressman. That is why I went to work for him.
I've already recieved contacts from reporters and conservative officials.
Well, you're gonna have contact with the FBI too...
thank you for posting your observations, and please don't be bothered by the skeptics...thats just what we should do more of, and sometimes we get carried away.
I've had an icky feeling all along about some of these pages not being the victims they're being made out, that they mocked Foley, thought he was wierd, and yucked it up about him for cruel sport. If I'm right, their sexuality would have little or nothing to do with the "games" they might have cooked up, so Jordan's sexuality is irrelevant.
So, Jordan Edmund made the bomb (the IM logs). Did he also throw it (give the IM logs to ABC)? If not, who did?
Don't know.
Well pulaskibush has been since before 9-11 so we might cut him some slack. It not like he singed up today. This is a 21 ye old. Hopefully Edmund wil tell who else could have 'stolen' the IM's to use for political purposes.
I believe this was the guy you were trying to post.
He may have been, it's just I didn't see it.
Uhhh... doesn't the law say that its the INTENT to entice a person under 18 into a "lewd" act that's the crime... I thought "trolling" for pedophiles was sop for investigators of this type of activity.
can it be found at archive.org?
If it's on the internet, it must be true! ;)
where's Sulu when you need her?...oops, him.
Bingo.
Why did Jordan Edmund need to hire a Criminal Attorney?
http://www.newsok.com/article/2951137
Oh look lucky for the Democrats the Ethic’s Committee
Subpoenas will have to wait until AFTER the election.
Hahahaha all the Gays will have to testify about their private sex lives and activities, like Nuremburg for Gay Democrats or jokers wild?
Ouch, can Michael Rogers get a fair trial? Criminal Attorney paid for by the DNC?
http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/100506/news3.html
] “North Carolina Republican Rep. Patrick McHenry called on Democratic leaders yesterday to testify under oath about when they knew of former Rep. Mark Foley’s (R-Fla.) Internet communications with a House page.
] Writing to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), McHenry questioned whether Democrats had a role in publicizing the e-mails, which broke in the middle of the fall election season creating a furor rarely seen in congressional politics.
] “Is the American public to believe that neither of you nor your staffs nor anyone associated with your staffs had prior knowledge or involvement with the release of Foley’s e-mails and/or explicit instant messages? Is the American public to believe that ABC News stumbled haphazardly on this story without Democratic assistance?” wrote McHenry, a freshman Republican who has emerged as an attack dog for the GOP.
] He asked that Pelosi and Emanuel offer a “yes or no” answer as to whether they would go under oath “to assure the American people that neither you nor your staffs had prior knowledge or involvement — at the strategic or tactical levels — with the release of Foley’s e-mails and/or instant messages.”
;-)
b How do you like your Eggs?
b October Surprise
Egg on the Democrats faces!
ain't it the truth? Folks way too gullible at times, but the guy who posted this thread has been around awhile, looks like a good guy to me, and I appreciate the info. PhiKapMom has also offered personal observations.
ROFLOL !!!! (you win post of the day !!!)
Now you done it! FBI is going to check on everyone posting on this thread! Ooops!
This is on page 341 of the Democrat playbook.
This will get so muddled up that in three days no one will kinow which way to turn. Documents will go missing, people will go silent, Democrats will say, "What? I didn't know anything about this."
The trail will go cold. No one will be brought up on charges.
The only thing that people will remember is that Congressman Foley was a pedophile.
There will be no Fitzmas today for the RATS. As a consolation gift they got a fag to retire and Congress will get a Republican congressman who is probably a bit to the right of Foley.
That looks like the case.
Not one in 10 FReepers knows how to spell Berkeley.
You mean Burklee?
Yes, I noticed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.