Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where'd all the "It's Just Sex"Democrats Go
Canada Free Press ^ | 03 Oct 06 | J.B. Williiams

Posted on 10/03/2006 7:42:21 AM PDT by rellimpank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

1 posted on 10/03/2006 7:42:22 AM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Great article! So true...


2 posted on 10/03/2006 7:46:20 AM PDT by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

You can't have sex with kids, though. There is no way to excuse Foley on this one, if these accusations are true, he is a big a pervert as any other pedophile.


3 posted on 10/03/2006 7:46:33 AM PDT by brwnsuga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Nice to finally see them coming out against gays though, isn't it?


4 posted on 10/03/2006 7:47:21 AM PDT by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

The heck with the "It's Just Sex" democrats -- what about the "It's a matter of personal privacy" democrats from back when Gerry Studds (D-MA) was having sexual relations with a 16 year old male page, and the democrats covered it up for 10 years? Then they grudgingly decided to censure him. And when they read the censure, Studds turned his back on the speaker and then held a press conference about how it was just a private matter and he never apologized. And then he ran for and was reelected for three more terms. These guys don't condemn what Foley was doing, they just see a political opportunity to use this against the Republicans.


5 posted on 10/03/2006 7:47:40 AM PDT by jnaujok (Charter member of the vast, right-wing conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: halo66
There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy.

Try as you might, you ain't gonna win with that argument.

6 posted on 10/03/2006 7:47:51 AM PDT by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brwnsuga

True...Foley is a big sicko pervert...


7 posted on 10/03/2006 7:48:31 AM PDT by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

100% spot on!


8 posted on 10/03/2006 7:50:53 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Liberals would let Mark Foley be a Boy Scout leader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt

Yeah...but he resigned. Clinton lied and continues to lie. I am not saying Foley's behavior should go unpunished. He is sick and needs help.


9 posted on 10/03/2006 7:51:00 AM PDT by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

It is my personal opinion that this scandal is "small town" big time. The question is how much did Barney Frank know and when did he know it? In small town gossip different groups,even if not aligned with one another, knows about the other group.

You can bet Barney Frank and probably Kolby of Arizona knew.


10 posted on 10/03/2006 7:51:13 AM PDT by texastoo ("trash the treaties")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Is "sex" with a minor just "sex"? I'd say no.


11 posted on 10/03/2006 7:52:28 AM PDT by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brwnsuga

The age of consent in DC is apparently 16. This "kid" was fully legally capable of consenting to any relationship.


12 posted on 10/03/2006 7:52:50 AM PDT by mak5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brwnsuga
You can't have sex with kids, though.

Actually, in Washington DC you can. The age of consent there is 16.

13 posted on 10/03/2006 7:52:50 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SengirV

Is there any evidence that Foley had sex with any minor? Or is this all based on emails and IMs?


14 posted on 10/03/2006 7:54:36 AM PDT by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SengirV

Is there any evidence that Foley had sex with any minor? Or is this all based on emails and IMs?


15 posted on 10/03/2006 7:55:02 AM PDT by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Someone has finally had the courage to call the dems on the carpet for their duplicity. It's about time!


16 posted on 10/03/2006 7:56:10 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Actually, in Washington DC you can. The age of consent there is 16.

Yuck. There is a higher law that is definitely being broken on that one. I don't care if it is legal, that's just gross.


17 posted on 10/03/2006 7:56:18 AM PDT by brwnsuga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

What's worse, IMing a page or getting oral sex from an intern?


18 posted on 10/03/2006 7:56:46 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: axel f

Another ping! Good article.


19 posted on 10/03/2006 7:58:04 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

See post no. 5. This is all bout disrupting Republican voters by calling their guys hypocrites while espousing family values. If it was a Dem the left would be defending him.


20 posted on 10/03/2006 7:59:16 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson