Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: halo66
There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy.

Try as you might, you ain't gonna win with that argument.

6 posted on 10/03/2006 7:47:51 AM PDT by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ContemptofCourt

Yeah...but he resigned. Clinton lied and continues to lie. I am not saying Foley's behavior should go unpunished. He is sick and needs help.


9 posted on 10/03/2006 7:51:00 AM PDT by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ContemptofCourt
There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy

Foley wrote about it...Clinton did it...and accosted women like Kathleen Willey.

And gave government jobs to his girlfriends.

And committed perjury about sex.

And probably raped a woman. Which one is worse?

35 posted on 10/03/2006 8:47:29 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ContemptofCourt
There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy.

As I understand it, 16 is the legal age of consent (though obviously it shouldnt be. 18 would be better)

50 posted on 10/03/2006 9:38:39 AM PDT by lowbridge (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ContemptofCourt

Yup, the age thing is the kicker. Any arguements comparing Clinton's escapades with Foley's is not compairing apples to apples.

Maybe its just me but I also have not heard that Foley actually had sex with the Page.


51 posted on 10/03/2006 9:59:24 AM PDT by A Texan (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ContemptofCourt
Clinton was banging a legal age chick....

Who was a government employee.

54 posted on 10/03/2006 10:03:02 AM PDT by Howlin (Release the Joe Wilson Niger Report!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ContemptofCourt
There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy.

16 may be the legal age. In 1983 a Democrat Congressman had sex with a 17 year old male page and Continued to serve. He maintained it was sex between two consenting adults.

64 posted on 10/03/2006 11:21:05 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ContemptofCourt
"There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy."

True enough, however, one can argue that Monica exhibited the emotional maturity and judgement of a 16 year old. Moreover, although Foley was an influential and powerful congresscritter his realm pales significantly when compared to the most powerful man in the world, i.e. Clinton at the time of Monicagate.

66 posted on 10/03/2006 1:28:15 PM PDT by Darlin' ((,,,, ? OMG ! I've missplaced another tagline ?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ContemptofCourt

It appears that the boy was 18.

I'm not defending Foley but facts are important.


84 posted on 10/05/2006 6:18:33 AM PDT by Beckwith (The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson