To: halo66
There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy.
Try as you might, you ain't gonna win with that argument.
To: ContemptofCourt
Yeah...but he resigned. Clinton lied and continues to lie. I am not saying Foley's behavior should go unpunished. He is sick and needs help.
9 posted on
10/03/2006 7:51:00 AM PDT by
halo66
To: ContemptofCourt
There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy Foley wrote about it...Clinton did it...and accosted women like Kathleen Willey.
And gave government jobs to his girlfriends.
And committed perjury about sex.
And probably raped a woman. Which one is worse?
To: ContemptofCourt
There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy.As I understand it, 16 is the legal age of consent (though obviously it shouldnt be. 18 would be better)
50 posted on
10/03/2006 9:38:39 AM PDT by
lowbridge
(I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
To: ContemptofCourt
Yup, the age thing is the kicker. Any arguements comparing Clinton's escapades with Foley's is not compairing apples to apples.
Maybe its just me but I also have not heard that Foley actually had sex with the Page.
51 posted on
10/03/2006 9:59:24 AM PDT by
A Texan
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: ContemptofCourt
Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Who was a government employee.
54 posted on
10/03/2006 10:03:02 AM PDT by
Howlin
(Release the Joe Wilson Niger Report!!!!)
To: ContemptofCourt
There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy. 16 may be the legal age. In 1983 a Democrat Congressman had sex with a 17 year old male page and Continued to serve. He maintained it was sex between two consenting adults.
To: ContemptofCourt
"There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy."True enough, however, one can argue that Monica exhibited the emotional maturity and judgement of a 16 year old. Moreover, although Foley was an influential and powerful congresscritter his realm pales significantly when compared to the most powerful man in the world, i.e. Clinton at the time of Monicagate.
66 posted on
10/03/2006 1:28:15 PM PDT by
Darlin'
((,,,, ? OMG ! I've missplaced another tagline ?))
To: ContemptofCourt
It appears that the boy was 18.
I'm not defending Foley but facts are important.
84 posted on
10/05/2006 6:18:33 AM PDT by
Beckwith
(The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson