Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rellimpank

Great article! So true...


2 posted on 10/03/2006 7:46:20 AM PDT by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: halo66
There is one difference here...Clinton was banging a legal age chick....Foley was trying to get into the pants of a 16 yo boy.

Try as you might, you ain't gonna win with that argument.

6 posted on 10/03/2006 7:47:51 AM PDT by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

This man had relations with one of legal consensual age. (And kept at 16 in 1993 by...whom?)

Clinton had relations with one of legal consensual age.

Clinton's adulterous foray, in his workplace during working hours, had no bearing on his work, D's said.

So, then, this is an issue for Democrats...why? Is it only about the use of the internet? About the nature of the behavior? About the age? They're going to end up ticking off their GLBTQ supporters. Oh, the irony.

46 posted on 10/03/2006 9:32:19 AM PDT by polymuser (There is one war and one enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson