Foley, C.R.E.W., Soros and Jason Leopold (TruthOut)

The Wide Awakes ^ | 10.02.06 | Permalink??

[rface]

...yet three people supposedly who had contact with Rep. Foley found it. Truthout’s Jason Leopold is implicated through mere speculation, as is C.R.E.W. because they’re the ones who released the shocking string of emails.....

..... the latest democratic hitjob which is being discussed behind the scenes, under the covers, and is now out in the open, thanks to CREW, the group that is representing Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson in their ridiculous lawsuit even after they’ve been exposed as a couple of democrat pandering liars.

This reveals in my mind a hypocritical double-standard. Peter Porcupine pointed out to a group of us that Rep. Gerry Studds, A Massachusetts democrat and Congressman, not only solicited a 15-year-old House page-but got him drunk on Cape Cod and sodomized him. Rep Studds was able to evade prosecution, as it happened in his Dupont Circle home, and the age of consent is lower in Washington proper.

He was then reelected by Mass. Democrats, proving that sexual exploitation of a child is no reason not to reelect a Democrat, and left the House in 1996.

On the other hand, you have a Republican who sends emails and is then forced to resign. Hmmm..

As Rick Moran points out in his great post on the subject, let’s consider the facts and when people knew what instead of jumping on the smear campaign bandwagon. Although judging from the repurcussions he’s experienced about that post if we didn’t know it before, we now know that smear is just about all the knuckledraggers have at this point in time; they have no new ideas, they have no strategy, they just have ‘attack’. Not a very good position to be in just before election time, so let’s have a little pity for their conspiracy theory generating hysteria.

Read Clarice Feldman over at the American Thinker and don’t even think about dropping troll turds in my comments section on this subject. Then, read another great analysis by Rick Moran of the genesis of a creepy looking website called Stop Sex Predators -which has the weird notoriety of being both nonoriginal in its content totally without readers, yet three people supposedly who had contact with Rep. Foley found it. Truthout’s Jason Leopold is implicated through mere speculation, as is CREW because they’re the ones who released the shocking string of emails, but I’ll let you parse through the posts and think about it for a bit. It’s a lot to consume; but it tells me there’s more afoot than what meets the eye, and I’m not talking about Foley’s behavior; I’m talking about what’s behind the carefully timed release of the shocking emails.

There were two strings of emails, one of which many people decided not to talk about because there was no implication of impropriety to them. The second string of emails was JUST RELEASED by CREW, a highly-charged political move designed to hit the airwaves right before election time, and perhaps turn morally prinicpled voters away. CREW is one of four George Soros-funded ‘public interest groups’ which endeavors, like the others, to attack and discredit members of the GOP, and along with that agenda, to ensure in what appear to be extreme and underhanded methods, the ‘win’ for democrats by default when a republican takes his fall as a result. It’s no wonder Soros is now talking about ‘getting out of politics’ when he has his minions doing his dirty work for him, all he has to do is sit back and enjoy the show.

Draw your own conclusions, but I find it to be, in a word; despicable

Said Cao @ 3:12 am | Permal

[penelopesire]

Here is the link to Mr. Rodgers bragging that he had the email before the story broke! Someone linked it in another thread.

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/blogactive/115975284374768134/#207771

Here is what he says:

"As people know, it's not always possible for me to disclose my role in some of the activities.

I can say this. I had the emails before they were on the net. Additionally, I had the additional emails, written by the page to a friend. The story was being written by a number of outlets and I provided additional information to reporters involved in the breaking of this story.

Was the central figure in reporting on Foley's latest scandal? Never said I was. Was my work on the case important to helping make sure it came out before the election? Yes.

Did I have any idea that the GOP leadership was engaged in a cover-up? Nope. Do I love the fact that they are trying to spin this as 'naughty emails?' Yup. because it shows how out of tought they are about queer closet cases."

[xcamel]

As in renewing the "No Child's Behind Left Behind" act? /s

[Defiant]

Wait a doggone minute here! What happened to the Congressional immunity that was so important when William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana, had his office violated? We went through days of examination of the effort to get info from the office of William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana, and not a bit of discussion about what the evidence revealed. Even though he was taped taking money, the feds were at fault somehow.

So, doesn't Foley get the same right to stay in office? What? He's a Republican? Never mind.

[Beckwith]

he is not any worse than any man who goes after a 'teen' girl

Foley was going after boys. Since he's obviously a homo, I'm surprised that the dhimmicrats are critical. I thought homos were one of their favorite constituencies.

You don't suppose that it's just another example of dhimmicrat hypocrisy?

[TexKat]

But that requires you to intercede.

True, however it is still considered an IM that was saved.

I also still have ims (not word docs) on an old computer that I have not used for some time. I do not recall doing anything to save them or delete them, but they are there.

[Fawn]

It's a given that the Dems always talk out of both sides of their bodies....no need to ask that question.

[usmcobra]

The boy is 22 now, was 19 then, and wasn't even a page at the time.

Those facts are being ignored by the media for the sake of the storyline.

[usmcobra]

Check it out, this liberal's reason why Foley is being attacked because he And Charlie Christ were once "Room mates" !

[PJ-Comix]

Okay, I sifted thru some of this maze of material and so far it is only SPECULATED That Jason Leopold is involved in this. Thus far no solid proof.

[freeangel]

Thanks for the info.

[Beckwith]

Huh? I don't understand the question.

What was ignored?

Who's the favored messenger?

[tiredoflaundry]

Jason desperately trying to become relevant again?

[cwb]

"Foley was going after boys. Since he's obviously a homo, I'm surprised that the dhimmicrats are critical. I thought homos were one of their favorite constituencies. You don't suppose that it's just another example of dhimmicrat hypocrisy?"

---

And this is exactly why some of the Dems are attacking Republicans like Hastert over what they knew, rather than attacking Foley, personally. The Dems are in a difficult position, trying not to alienate their Gay constituents by looking like homophobes, while still attacking Republicans for not protecting "the children."

Republicans need to point this hypocrisy out, noting that many Dems aren't upset at what Foley did, but rather what some Republicans may have not done. This is why it is just as important for Republicans to find out what Democrat operatives knew about these emails and IMs and did nothing but use them as political fodder...rather than protecting the children.

[Beckwith]

Thanks . . . that I understand.

[AmeriBrit]

Wow! That last post was rather educational proving how a democRATs mind works. I was waiting for the smoke to come out the back of my monitor.

[TexKat]

some snippets from AIM’s between Foley and the page.

[penelopesire]

LOL...go read what I wrote over at CREW's blogsite:

http://blog.citizensforethics.org/node/101#comment-363

You'll know which one is mine!

[TexKat]

Mark Foley's My Space Profile

mark
 
    

Male 
52 years old 
PALM BEACH, Florida 
United States 


Last Login: 12/16/2005 
 
View My: Pics | Videos  
 

   Contacting mark  
 
     
 
    
 
    
    
 
 

     mark's Details  
Status: Single 
Zodiac Sign: Virgo 
Children: I don't want kids