Posted on 10/01/2006 4:26:20 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, October 1st, 2006
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif.; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf; Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, and his Democratic opponent, Rep. Sherrod Brown.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Presidential counselor Dan Bartlett; Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Bartlett; Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.; poet laureate Donald Hall.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Bartlett; U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad; Sens. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.; former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.
Don't know if you saw No Excuse for Terror yet.
(By a lib, prayer works)
http://hurryupharry.bloghouse.net/archives/2006/09/27/youtube_no_excuses_for_terror.php
Here's the Muslim Brotherhood/History Channed link as well:
(scroll down)
http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/
Somebody wanted this... forgot who:
The Bin Laden’s-Still-Alive Blame Game
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5898
Responsibility is Opt-In.
"The trolls will be after me too LOL"
And me as well. LOL!
I am sure that was a consideration in the way this matter was handled.
Dumb question.
Did anyone ever ask Gorelick about the conflict of interest re: Ben Veniste and herself on the 9-11 commission?
LOL! I like your mom's attitude! Good for her :-)
He could have thrown his hat in the ring this year.
And voting Democrat is opting out.
I'll let him know what you said!
Why don't you tell me something I don't know... Geeze. It's always a problem when one of the President's confidants in his inner circle goes and blabs to the press about said confidential advice that he gave our commander in chief especially while we are at war. I suppose you think it's fine that Card has given our political and media enemies ammunition to hurt this administration. Just who do you think Andy Card helped by doing this?
Wasn't it just LAST YEAR that California gays were trying to get Gay Oral Sex between adults and 16/17 year old teens LEGALIZED???
Can anyone help me find a reference to this??
re: Clinton/Moscow
Queen of hearts.
Do you remember a few years back when Sherrod Brown was on Hannity & Colmes and insulted Colmes, telling him he was a token liberal? Colmes got pretty mad. Brown was never invited back.
bump for the NYT lies!! haha!
This is why I've come to the conclusion that we've been wrong to deny the allegations that "this is another Vietnam." Instead of denying it we should take up that charge, but explain what it really means.
We won, militarily, in Vietnam. Every analysis admits that. But then we were betrayed by the international left who conspired to spread propaganda, including unending lies, to destroy our will to fight. And the free people of South Vietnam and the enslaved people of North Vietnam were betrayed and murdered in the millions by these same people. And further millions were killed in surrounding countries as the leftists marched on, slaughtering as they went, in the name of their movement.
John Kerry, Hanoi Jane, Walter Cronkite and all the rest have blood on their hands that puts them in the class of murderers on historic scales. Murtha, Sheehan, Rather, Alter, Moore, Carter and the new crop are seeking to do the same thing in the middle east because they hate us and see us as the real enemy. This is a war, pure and simple, and they have decided that they will ally themselves with anyone to defeat us, no matter who or what they are. We must treat them accordingly.
Someone, somewhere, is going to work out their logic like this:
The left has proven that if you only kill enough people then you're not a murderer, your a freedom fighter in a movement, therefore they must start killing the leftists in the same way the leftists allies are killing us.
They will then apply that logic... in spades. The bloodbath will be awful. It may happen sooner rather than later. It will happen, within minutes, if we are hit with WMD, or some other horror attack. How many mosques will burn if the Vatican is destroyed and the Pope killed? How many "reporters" will be left hanging from lamp posts? How many "peace activists" will be rounded up and left in piles with bullet riddled bodies ala Mussolini or Ceausescu?
I am not advocating this course of action. I am stating that, given the left's logic, their rhetoric and their actions, it is nearly inevitable that it will be turned back on them.
After the invasion and rape of Poland by Germany and Russia the UK went into a period they later called "the phony war." Regardless of how real you think the current state of war is, it's not real war, at least not to us, in our society. Something is going to happen, a nuke or an assassination or some atrocity, but this relatively peaceful period will end and the west will finally wake up and realize that we are in a fight for survival, period, end of discussion. And then we will wage war with all the fury and power at our disposal. And the bill for that in terms of human carnage and loss will be incalculable.
I believe that George W. Bush's policies have been directed at avoiding that true, all out war, at almost any cost, particularly to himself. It truly has been a noble effort, but I think that he's failed. Time is running out. We will not go gentle into that good night. A civlization must not only rage against the dying of the light, it must fight and succeed in preserving that light. We've done it before, all too many times. We will do it again.
But John Kerry, Hanoi Jane, Walter Cronkite, Murtha, Sheehan, Rather, Alter, Moore, Carter and their allies will be among the first stood up against the wall.
I haven't seen anything about California, but this was a shocker.
The age of consent for gays is 16 in the UK.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/1047291.stm
We already know Democrats are confused over this, and I don't just mean homosexuality. More importantly, if the age of consent is 16 in DC, technically there was no law broken.
I would submit House rules were broken, or at minimum stretched and taken advantage of. The good news is Republicans didn't cover it up or continue supporting such bad behavior. We did something about it. I believe that ends the Democrats holier than thou attitude since they refuse to hold their members accountable for their actions.
I don't recall this Sherrod Brown at all, but I am NOT a regular Hannity and Homely viewer.
Thanks, good catch Tx.
Off to get dinner and fed the pigeons will probably look in again later to catch up on posts if not thanks for the discussion as usual most enjoyable.
See you all next Sunday if not before
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.