Posted on 10/01/2006 4:26:20 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, October 1st, 2006
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif.; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf; Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, and his Democratic opponent, Rep. Sherrod Brown.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Presidential counselor Dan Bartlett; Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Bartlett; Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.; poet laureate Donald Hall.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Bartlett; U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad; Sens. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.; former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.
Brown is just now lying, he doesn't give a crap about the middle class
If his lips are moving he's lying !
Now he's crying about Dewines attack adds lol
If we leave prematurely, that is exactly what will happen. That would spell the death of hundreds of thousands of Sunnis. That is why support for the US staying is on the upswing in Sunni communities.
We need to remind the Dems of the horrible aftermath of Vietnam every chance we get.
I hope Ohio voters can see through Brown.
They're the only ones who matter.
I don't wish to be national news.
Hey def, thought you'd like to know, Rudy declined to do Pirro's shindig. There's a lot of buzz about it here in NY now.
Necessary adjustment!
FWIW - here's the current polling data on DeWine-Brown - looks like Brown is up about 4% (sorry - don't know how to format):
Ohio Senate Race: Mike DeWine (R) vs. Sherrod Brown (D)
Poll Date Sample DeWine (R) Brown (D) Spread
RCP Average 09/07 to 09/27 - 43.2% 47.8% Brown +4.6%
Mason-Dixon 09/25 - 09/27 625 LV 43% 45% Brown +2%
Columbus Dispatch 09/09 - 09/22 1791 RV 42% 47% Brown +5%
SurveyUSA 09/18 - 09/20 490 LV 42% 52% Brown +10%
Quinnipiac 09/11 - 09/17 876 LV 44% 45% Brown +1%
University of Cincinnati 09/07 - 09/17 671 LV 47% 51% Brown +4%
Rasmussen 09/13 - 09/13 500 LV 41% 47% Brown +6%
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2006/senate/
Brown will show independence by voting against George Bush almost all the time.
They don't care. It's anti-Bush and that's all. They couldn't care less about the war in Iraq. If POTUS wanted to call the troops home, they'd be for staying!
Beam me up! Congress hasn't been the same since "you know who" has left.
Could you please advise what a House Page is thanks
Oh, but I insist!
Then they move on to the Clinton melt down.
See the Chris Wallace preview Coming Up on FOX News Sunday for all of the pre-show skinny. Here's the portion on their review of last weeks interview:
Then we will speak to a trio of terrorism experts to discuss President Clinton’s assertions during his FOX News Sunday interview last week, in which he argued that he "got closer to killing" Usama bin Laden than the Bush administration has.
How close did the Clinton administration come to killing the al Qaeda leader, what was the extent of his administration’s military planning for Afghanistan, and what was done to bring down the "wall" between the FBI and CIA during the 1990s? Additionally, did the Bush administration do everything it could have done to address the threat from al Qaeda during its first eight months in office? We will debate the facts with a member of the Clinton National Security Council, Daniel Benjamin, former head of the CIA’s bin Laden unit, Michael Scheuer, and Lawrence Wright, acclaimed author of the new book "The Looming Tower."
This sounds very promising. I think it may be so promising that the Dhimmicrats decided to use their biggest weapon against the Republicans, the Foley matter, which I'm betting they were saving for only a week or two out from the election. They seem a bit desperate to push this Foley story out to drown out everything else and all of a sudden don't want to talk about Clinton anymore. They also have way too much material prepared on the Foley matter to not have known about it for quite some time.
Foley's guilty. Everything else about this affair is a distraction.
Pay attention to what goes on on Fox today.
I know one of Mike's kids, he won't run my dirt. He's an honorable man and I hope he wins.
They need to ask this every single time it is brought up.
@@@@@
There are so many questions that "reporters" ignore these days, it is infuriating.
All they have to do is look at his voting record and the way he talks about the Presidency hes die hard liberal through and through !
Any reason given? Care to speculate?
Hey you sound pretty like me :0)
Newt wasn't very good as a defender of the Bush administration, not very good at all. He has other coals on the fire.
Yes, you're right. More troops, less troops...GWB can't win.
That is the basis for hating Rumsfeld so much. He has had a strategy from day one and has not strayed from it. It is driving the administrations critics nuts that they cannot get him to waffle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.