Posted on 09/25/2006 4:51:39 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
Chris Wallace (FOX TV) just stated on the Monday morning news segment of Fox TV (aired in the 7:00 a.m. EST hour) that, not only did Bill Clinton retain his anger at Wallace after the interview was over and the cameras were off (despite Wallace trying to part on friendly terms), Clinton absolutely fumed at his own personal staff, right then and there while still on the Fox TV premises, for getting him into the interview with Wallace where he had earlier lost his head.
Wallace said Clinton's blow up at his staff for this mistake was very visible and very audible and very emotional.
I said it yesterday and I'll say it again. What the interview did was to display once and for all that clinton was FAR FAR more angry with his domestic political foes, that he was ever with the Islamofascists who were killing and bombing Americans all over the world.
Now, Bill Kristol joins the chorus, saying that clinton did this purposefully in order to "intimidate" other journalists from asking any questions.
Give me a break, Kristol.
I wonder if Rush still has the tape? Anyone here on FR, if they have a subscription to Rush, should ask him to post it.
and his mouth drew in to 1/2 its normal size.
^^^^
That was very revealing to me. He has always appeared on camera talking with his mouth in the "e", or smiling position. He was so angry that he lost control of that ability. It was the first time that I can recall of seeing his mouth in the "oo" position. And you are correct. It got tiny. (I find everything about the man repulsive, and that tiny mouth was no exception.) Creepy!
I saw that clip also...he was touring some low-end housing, and was taped viciously berating his people over some trivial item. Very telling indeed.
Well of course. He & PIAPS are perfect. They have never, ever, done anything wrong, don't cha know.
Clinton has on occasion scolded other interviewers, most notably in a 2004 sitdown with ABC's Peter Jennings, who drew this response after alluding to Clinton's personal misconduct: "You don't want to go here, Peter. . . . Not after what you people did and the way you, your network, what you did with Kenneth Starr. The way your people repeated every, little sleazy thing he leaked."
I recall that Jennings was also stunned.
Not if you're white trash.
I do that sometimes. My wife calls it "butt mouth".
TOO FUNNY, LOL
I think there could be some truth in that. Not that Clinturd isn't a thug with a short fuse but there could be an attempt to intimidate against questions he doesn't want to answer.
And which he never really did answer directly, of course.
A bit more Jennings/Clinton here:
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/11/19/204737.shtml
The former president responded, "You don't want to go here, Peter. You don't want to go here. Not after what you people did and the way you, your network, what you did with Kenneth Starr. The way your people repeated every, little sleazy thing he leaked. No one has any idea what that's like."
"You never had to live in a time when people you knew and cared about were being indicted, carted off to jail, bankrupted, ruined, because they were Democrats and because they would not lie," he said. "So, I think we showed a lot of moral fiber to stand up to that. To stand up to these constant investigations, to this constant bodyguard of lies, this avalanche that was thrown at all of us. And, yes, I failed once. And I sure paid for it. And I'm sorry. I'm sorry for the American people. And I'm sorry for the embarrassment they performed."
They had made the mayor or the rep from DC stand out in the rain waiting for his late ass, and he was made at them for having her wait in the rain.
Clinton's so-called "legacy" was set in stone on a Friday in Dec 1193 when the "Troopergate" story hit the newsstands. I'll NEVER forget the pic of him on the Washington Times front page under that headline, wearing a Christmas tie and that famous pout.
It wasn't about Monica or her "looks". He is a sick.
It's simply trying to spin history, the way the clinton apologists always do.
LOL.
mad=made
From what I've read, the Clintons wrote the book on these practices.
Once? Well now we have a second failure he's admitted to. :0
I'd bet this would make a good audio montage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.