Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black GOP group runs controversial ads
Akron Beacon Journal & AP via Ohio.com ^ | September 23, 2006 | Kristen Wyatt

Posted on 09/24/2006 10:33:07 PM PDT by stainlessbanner

A national black Republican group is running a radio advertisement accusing Democrats of starting the Ku Klux Klan and saying the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican, a claim challenged by civil-rights researchers.

The National Black Republican Association ads have been heard in Ohio, the Ohio Democratic Party said Thursday.

Republican Party officials and the campaign for Republican gubernatorial nominee Ken Blackwell, who is black, said they haven't heard of the ads and can't say whether they've aired in Ohio.

Blackwell, the state's secretary of state, faces Democratic U.S. Rep. Ted Strickland, who is white, in the November election.

U.S. Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones said in a news release that she wants the National Black Republican Association to discontinue the ads.

``This radio ad campaign is the sort of shameful tactic that Republicans are using to distract from their failed leadership in Ohio and the United States,'' said Tubbs Jones, a Democrat.

Ohio Republican Party spokesman John McClelland said he hasn't heard of the ads but read a transcript on the Web site of the National Black Republican Association.

``This is the same type of race-baiting that we don't like the Democrats doing,'' he said. ``This ad would not be something the party would condone.''

The Washington Post reported Thursday that the ad was running on stations in Baltimore.

In Maryland, Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, the black Republican nominee for that state's open Senate seat, disavowed the ad Thursday as ``insulting to Marylanders.'' He said his campaign asked the Washington-based National Black Republican Association to stop running it.

At an event in Baltimore, Steele said, ``I don't know exactly what the intent of the ad was'' but that ``it's not helpful to the public discourse.''

The ad does not mention any candidates.

Blackwell, who would be Ohio's first black governor, is thought to have the potential to cut into some of the Democratic Party's black base. But Strickland leads Blackwell comfortably in polls released this week.

The president of the National Black Republican Association, Frances Rice, did not return calls for comment. The group, founded a year ago, promotes the GOP to black voters.

It was not immediately clear which radio stations were airing the 60-second ad or how long it had been running. The group's Web site announced the ad's release in a statement dated two weeks ago.

The spot begins with one woman telling another, ``Dr. King was a real man. You know he was a Republican.''

Steve Klein, a senior researcher with the Atlanta-based King Center, said Thursday that King never endorsed candidates from either party.

``I think it's highly inaccurate to say he was a Republican because there's really no evidence,'' Klein said.

A King biographer, Taylor Branch, also said Thursday that King was nonpartisan.

In the ad, the woman goes on to say, ``Democrats passed those black codes and Jim Crow laws. Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan.'' Her companion replies, ``The Klan? White hoods and sheets?''

The KKK, never a political party, was a racist group of white men that started in the South after the Civil War, when Republicans were almost unheard of in former Confederate states. The mainstream Democratic Party never endorsed the Klan nor claimed to have founded it.

The group running the ads describes itself on its Web site as ``a resource for the black community on Republican ideals.'' It does not say how many members it has.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: black; commerical; crow; gop; jim; kkk

1 posted on 09/24/2006 10:33:08 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

On one hand, it is race baiting. On the other hand, there is a misconception that Republicans are patent racists and Democrats are not racist at all.


2 posted on 09/24/2006 10:38:03 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

*cough* Robert Byrd *cough*


3 posted on 09/24/2006 10:38:53 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Just heard it on the organization's website. Among other things, the ad implies that the GOP supports affirmative action and the Democrats oppose it. Is this the message we want to send? How does this ad help conservatives?


4 posted on 09/24/2006 10:39:20 PM PDT by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Oh, I beg you to bring that down to Mississippi. Jackson NEEDS A HARDLINE REPUBLICAN MAYOR! My kids all think that Lincoln was a Democrat.


5 posted on 09/24/2006 10:41:22 PM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Although he set about freeing the slaves, Lincoln was a racist.


6 posted on 09/24/2006 10:43:38 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

These ads should run in St. Louis and wherever else the scumbag Democrats have run their "black churches will burn" ads and their "James Byrd, pick-up truck lynching" ads. Screw 'em. Where can I donate?


7 posted on 09/24/2006 10:45:25 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
Although he set about freeing the slaves, Lincoln was a racist.

Who wasn't a racist in 1860?

8 posted on 09/24/2006 10:47:59 PM PDT by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

I see Republicans and controversial in the headline: someone must have slipped and told the truth.


9 posted on 09/24/2006 10:56:40 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Sounds to me like this particular group has more money than sense.

Crude and unhelpful, I'm afraid, if you care about getting folks off the Dem plantation.


10 posted on 09/24/2006 10:57:32 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (What man still doesn't know about God's creation is still enough to fill a universe...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Exactly what I was thinking. These ads are tame, compared to some of the ones put out by Democrats. Let them run.


11 posted on 09/24/2006 10:57:44 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Wasn't Governor Wallace a democrat? And David Duke?


12 posted on 09/24/2006 10:58:14 PM PDT by rfreedom4u (Islam is the devil's voice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18
Who wasn't a racist in 1860?

Exactly. Racism has been the norm in all societies throughout human history until the last hundred years or so ago when Western Civilization adopted the notion of racial equality.

13 posted on 09/24/2006 11:04:43 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u

David Duke was elected as a Republican, though with no support from the state or national party.


14 posted on 09/24/2006 11:06:06 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

lib/dems always trot out robert KKK byrd as their champion!!!

of ocurse the lib/msm never challenges him or other lib/dems....

it is always the bad racist republicans that are going to put blacks back on the plantation..

and as piaps says.."and ya know what I'm talkin about!"


15 posted on 09/25/2006 3:20:10 AM PDT by hnj_00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18; Jedi Master Pikachu
Who wasn't a racist in 1860?

Who's not a racist now?

According to anyone running for office if you don't agree with diversity and multiculturalism as the ultimate social construct, you're a racist.

16 posted on 09/25/2006 4:28:48 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
...when Western Civilization adopted the notion of racial equality.

How is that possible? How can we NOT see the differences in race?

17 posted on 09/25/2006 4:30:02 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
Lincoln was a racists?
Hmmmmmm you must've seen the "Revisionary History" special that also implied Lincoln was Gay.
Lincoln was a man of his times, while he may have been ambivalent about the plight of slaves at the beginning of his presidency, it was in fact his RELIGIOUS beliefs that eventually drew him into being against slavery, and wanting to free the Black MAN. Its bad enough Democrat Union public schools distort & slander the memory of Reagan, and Lincoln (along with most of our forefathers) but it bugs the hell outta me when so called "conservatives" repeat the leftest crap on FR.
18 posted on 10/28/2006 8:26:11 AM PDT by Nav_Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson