Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton faults Bush for inaction on bin Laden
reuters.myway.com ^ | Sep 22, 11:42 PM (ET) | By Joanne Morrison

Posted on 09/23/2006 7:58:13 AM PDT by excludethis

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Former President Bill Clinton, angrily defending his efforts to capture Osama bin Laden, accused the Bush administration of doing far less to stop the al Qaeda leader before the September 11 attacks.

In a heated interview to be aired on Sunday on "Fox News Sunday," the former Democratic president defended the steps he took after al Qaeda's attack on the USS Cole in 2000 and faulted "right-wingers" for their criticism of his efforts to capture Osama bin Laden.

"But at least I tried. That's the difference in me and some, including all of the right-wingers who are attacking me now," Clinton said when asked whether he had failed to fully anticipate bin Laden's danger. "They had eight months to try, they did not try. I tried. So I tried and failed."

The September 11 attacks occurred almost eight months after President George W. Bush succeeded Clinton in January 2001.

"I authorized the CIA to get groups together to try to kill him," Clinton said. He added he had drawn up plans to go into Afghanistan to overthrow the Taliban and launch an attack against bin Laden after the attack on the Cole in the Yemeni port of Aden.

"Now if you want to criticize me for one thing, you can criticize me for this: after the Cole, I had battle plans drawn to go into Afghanistan, overthrow the Taliban and launch a full-scale attack search for bin Laden. But we needed basing rights in Uzbekistan -- which we got after 9/11," Clinton said.

The former president complained at the time the CIA and FBI refused to certify bin Laden was responsible for the USS Cole attack.

"While I was there, they refused to certify. So that meant I would have had to send a few hundred special forces in helicopters, refuel at night," he said.

Earlier this month, Clinton dismissed as "indisputably wrong" a U.S. television show that suggested her was too distracted by the Monica Lewinsky scandal to confront the Islamic militant threat that culminated in the September 11 attacks.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: 2bizarre4arods; biglietechnique; bilie; bizarroworld; clintonlegacy; goebbelswouldbeproud; incompetents; pathto911; slick; touchytouchy; weboflies; whoshekdiing; yougottabekidding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

1 posted on 09/23/2006 7:58:13 AM PDT by excludethis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: excludethis

The legacy's sticking, no matter how hard this old dog wants to shake it off.


2 posted on 09/23/2006 7:59:46 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

What a self absorbed sack of camel excrement. He had Bin Laden on a platter and passed on him. He is nothing but a pure liar.


3 posted on 09/23/2006 8:00:27 AM PDT by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
Remember the good old days when former Presidents faded into the background and kept quiet?

...sigh....

4 posted on 09/23/2006 8:01:56 AM PDT by Cable225 (I almost never post, and rarely reply - but I donate to FR. How about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cable225

What happened in NYC in 1993?? A non-event??


5 posted on 09/23/2006 8:03:21 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
Clinton is just pissed so many people watched "The Path to 9/11". Clinton just threw gas on the fire.

The DIMS are losing it. I just drove down the road and regular gasoline is $2.29 and in free fall. They have to defend BUSH against Chavez and it is killing them

They are going to lose big time come November.

6 posted on 09/23/2006 8:04:22 AM PDT by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Keep blubbering, Bubba. Wag that crooked finger of "truth" at us some more, lol.


7 posted on 09/23/2006 8:04:53 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
Former President Bill Clinton, angrily defending his efforts to capture Osama bin Laden,

Efforts to capture? The Sudanese offered bin Laden to the Clinton admin on a platter - repeatedly! - and he wouldn't take him!

8 posted on 09/23/2006 8:05:25 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

"That's my story and I'm sticking to it"


9 posted on 09/23/2006 8:06:00 AM PDT by Youngman442002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
CLINTON IS A LYING SACK OF SH*T!
10 posted on 09/23/2006 8:06:04 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Dems seem to excel in that mental malady known as "projection"


11 posted on 09/23/2006 8:06:23 AM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
Oh, he opened a can of worms now.

How stupid. It's all going to backsplash right in his face. For example, I think nearly 28,000 have already seen the YouTube.com posting showing Clinton losing it, trying to hold onto legacy, with just a thin, tenuous link of lies.

12 posted on 09/23/2006 8:06:33 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cable225
Remember the good old days when former Presidents faded into the background and kept quiet?

Note that only former Republican Presidents are sticking to that. Reagan did. Nixon did. Gerald Ford is (Ford is so quiet that some people dont even realize that he's still alive!). George Bush, Sr. is. etc.

Survivng Dem Presidents on the other hand...Carter and Clinton......

13 posted on 09/23/2006 8:07:41 AM PDT by lowbridge (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

I'm thinking that Clinton is betting that UBL is dead so he's trying to get his licks in ahead of the story. All the other explanations are nonsensical excepting hubris.


14 posted on 09/23/2006 8:08:01 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Labs Rules! Brilliant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

As we watch the DRAMA on Fox News Sunday, lets keep in mind the old saying about pointing fingers.....something about being careful when pointing your finger because three fingers are pointing back at you.


15 posted on 09/23/2006 8:09:44 AM PDT by Bob from De ((All liberals may not be narcissists...but it sure seems to help))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
They had eight months to try

you had eight years...damn you
16 posted on 09/23/2006 8:10:15 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

let's do the math here.....billy bj had at least two-and-a-half years (assuming we dismiss the attack of 1993 and start with Khobar Towers) to get bin laden and numerous opportunities but failed miserably....

so he wants to compare 30 months of his second term as president to what amounts to seven months of GWB's first term???

Sounds like someone is trying to cover their sorry rear-end....


17 posted on 09/23/2006 8:10:30 AM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Loser who only wanted to get BJ's. Pathetic POS.


18 posted on 09/23/2006 8:10:46 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
Thin skinned mother-fletcher. He protests so much it gives him away. Look at what he did not what he said. He is a proven liar, letch, whore-monger, lover of himself, adulterer, thief, and many other undesirable characteristics can apply. I find not a single redeeming quality in this man.

His body language is the singular characteristic that gives him away. He is like a 15 year old who got caught and now is trying to talk so fast that he extricates himself from a trap which is clearly ensnaring him. The more he flails, the more he declares his true nature.

And if Hillary is elected to the presidency she will be worse,... she is at least as mean and more apt to act on her being called out. These are very dangerous people.

19 posted on 09/23/2006 8:10:54 AM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
Do the Democrats really want Bill Clinton hogging the airwaves in the run up to the election? On the other hand, there's not much they can do about it. Maybe they can punish his wife somehow but Goober himself is out of their control.

Hah, hah, hah, hah.

20 posted on 09/23/2006 8:10:58 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson