Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Appeals court says public libraries can bar religious services
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 9/20/06 | David Kravets - ap

Posted on 09/20/2006 5:15:17 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

Government libraries can block religious groups from worshipping in public meeting rooms, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The decision overturns a lower court order allowing a Christian group to pray in a Contra Costa County library.

The Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries, which initially was rejected from holding prayer services at the county's Antioch branch, had won a court order allowing them to pray in meeting rooms open to other groups. A federal judge said it had a First Amendment right of religion to use the public's facilities.

But a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned that ruling Wednesday in a 2-1 decision.

"Prohibiting Faith Center's religious worship services from the Antioch meeting room is a permissible exclusion of a category of speech," Judge Richard Paez ruled.

In dissent, Judge Richard Tallman said the county went too far.

"Rather than adopting a policy of neutrality and placing reasonable time, place and manner restrictions on every group that uses the library meeting rooms, the county has gone to great lengths to exclude a non-disruptive community group based on the views it wishes to express," Tallman wrote.

Contra Costa County had appealed the lower court's decision, arguing that religious groups have a right of free access to its public library facilities in the Bay Area, but allowing prayer services would mean taxpayers would be subsidizing religious exercises.

"Religious worship services is a category of speech that we are allowed to exclude," said Kelly Flanagan, a county attorney. "Had we said Christians can use this but Jews can't, that would be discrimination."

The Alliance Defense Fund, which is defending the church group, called the decision "astounding."

"Religious people ... whether they're Jewish, Muslim or Christian or any other faith under the sun, this is not what the First Amendment was intended to do, to authorize censorship of speech in public," said Gary McCaleb, an ADF attorney.

The group, he said, would consider appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court or asking the appeals court to reconsider.

In December, the Bush administration weighed in on the case, filing a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of the church. The administration said the government "has an interest in enforcement of First Amendment principles providing equal treatment of persons irrespective of their religious beliefs."

The county's policy allows the public to use free meeting rooms at its libraries, but prohibits "religious services." The Sierra Club, Narcotics Anonymous and even the East Contra Costa Democratic Club have used the county's library facilities.

The case began in 2004 when Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries told the county that it wished to hold a "prayer, praise and worship" service that would be open to the public. The group held one session before the county banned it from having others.

The church group sued, demanding equal treatment and claiming it was being discriminated against because of its speech.

The case is Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries v. Glover, 05-16132.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; appealscourt; california; publiclibraries; religiousservices
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 09/20/2006 5:15:19 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Ho Hum, Ninth Circus to be over ruled in another instance on an issue they've been over ruled on time and time again.
2 posted on 09/20/2006 5:18:09 PM PDT by MrEdd (It's not funny anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The 9th Circus. Destroying American heritage one tradition at a time. Something very bad needs to happen to these non-humans. I'll leave it there dangling for you.


3 posted on 09/20/2006 5:18:47 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Islam is to Western Civilization what ticks are to a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

I guarantee you that the 9th will find an exception for Muslims...


4 posted on 09/20/2006 5:23:08 PM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Mid-90s, I was having to battle the local "grammar" school who was preventing a Girl Scout troop from using the facility. The "God" thing was offensive to them, no doubts. They lost, we won. But obviously, only for a time.


5 posted on 09/20/2006 5:23:46 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Is this the same court of appeals that said libraries must allow street bums to sleep and stink up a building???


6 posted on 09/20/2006 5:24:46 PM PDT by tubebender (Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I guess that means they can bar environmental meetings too, since they are also faith based.


7 posted on 09/20/2006 5:25:48 PM PDT by Maceman (This is America. Why must we press "1" for English?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well of course...after all, it's the Ninth Circus.


8 posted on 09/20/2006 5:31:57 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Group A wants to meet in a library. Group B wants to meet in a library. Group A is allowed and group B is denied. The reason? Group B wants to pray. Another blatant case of discrimination based on religion brought to you by the 9th Circus. Constitutional rights guaranteed to every minority in the US are routinely denied to religious groups.


9 posted on 09/20/2006 5:32:57 PM PDT by KingKenrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Yet phallic art is OK http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=15381 "The piece, which featured 21 brightly colored ceramic penises hanging from a clothesline, was stolen from the Boulder Public Library and replaced with an American flag on Nov. 10. The library had refused to remove the artwork, which was part of an exhibit sponsored by a local battered women’s shelter in recognition of Domestic Violence Awareness Month."


10 posted on 09/20/2006 5:33:22 PM PDT by PghBaldy (CNN on Castro - Intestinal Crisis 2006: A People Mourn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

God, why would any religion want to use a government anything?


11 posted on 09/20/2006 5:34:50 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

correction- that wasn't a court case, but it would probably be allowed by this court... It seems the 1st Amendment is ONLY about some speech, and not religion.


12 posted on 09/20/2006 5:35:11 PM PDT by PghBaldy (CNN on Castro - Intestinal Crisis 2006: A People Mourn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
One can imagine the popularity of an initiative, if the process existed at the federal level, proposing that the jurisdiction of the 9th Circus extends only to the interior space of the court house in San Francisco, in which it conducts official business.
13 posted on 09/20/2006 5:38:19 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

why do I have this feeling I'm being choked?


14 posted on 09/20/2006 5:38:43 PM PDT by air pappy (one last chance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Also from the 9th curcuit


In a decision Wednesday by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which could be used to force election officials throughout the state to require multiple-language petitions for ballot issues according to voting-rights advocates.
15 posted on 09/20/2006 5:45:56 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (I did use spell check!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kromike

Bet they won't ~ but they won't do it again.


16 posted on 09/20/2006 5:50:21 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

This decision won't destroy anything because it'll be overturned easily.


17 posted on 09/20/2006 5:53:12 PM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

"I guess that means they can bar environmental meetings too, since they are also faith based."

As are many NA meetings.


18 posted on 09/20/2006 5:54:10 PM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well of course! Our constitution calls for freedom FROM religion doesn't it? /sarcasm
Would Muslims be barred as well I wonder?


19 posted on 09/20/2006 5:57:08 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Shouldn't the people who pay taxes to build the libraries have some say in this or do we just have to do what three perverts in San Francisco (of all places) say? This isn't America. Seig Hiel!


20 posted on 09/20/2006 6:00:32 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (You can't defeat your enemy unless you are willing to get down in the mud with him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson