Skip to comments.
CA: Appeals court says public libraries can bar religious services
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^
| 9/20/06
| David Kravets - ap
Posted on 09/20/2006 5:15:17 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Ho Hum, Ninth Circus to be over ruled in another instance on an issue they've been over ruled on time and time again.
2
posted on
09/20/2006 5:18:09 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(It's not funny anymore.)
To: NormsRevenge
The 9th Circus. Destroying American heritage one tradition at a time. Something very bad needs to happen to these non-humans. I'll leave it there dangling for you.
3
posted on
09/20/2006 5:18:47 PM PDT
by
Viking2002
(Islam is to Western Civilization what ticks are to a dog.)
To: Viking2002
I guarantee you that the 9th will find an exception for Muslims...
4
posted on
09/20/2006 5:23:08 PM PDT
by
kromike
To: NormsRevenge
Mid-90s, I was having to battle the local "grammar" school who was preventing a Girl Scout troop from using the facility. The "God" thing was offensive to them, no doubts. They lost, we won. But obviously, only for a time.
5
posted on
09/20/2006 5:23:46 PM PDT
by
Alia
To: NormsRevenge
Is this the same court of appeals that said libraries must allow street bums to sleep and stink up a building???
6
posted on
09/20/2006 5:24:46 PM PDT
by
tubebender
(Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
To: NormsRevenge
I guess that means they can bar environmental meetings too, since they are also faith based.
7
posted on
09/20/2006 5:25:48 PM PDT
by
Maceman
(This is America. Why must we press "1" for English?)
To: NormsRevenge
Well of course...after all, it's the Ninth Circus.
8
posted on
09/20/2006 5:31:57 PM PDT
by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: NormsRevenge
Group A wants to meet in a library. Group B wants to meet in a library. Group A is allowed and group B is denied. The reason? Group B wants to pray. Another blatant case of discrimination based on religion brought to you by the 9th Circus. Constitutional rights guaranteed to every minority in the US are routinely denied to religious groups.
To: NormsRevenge
Yet phallic art is OK http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=15381 "The piece, which featured 21 brightly colored ceramic penises hanging from a clothesline, was stolen from the Boulder Public Library and replaced with an American flag on Nov. 10. The library had refused to remove the artwork, which was part of an exhibit sponsored by a local battered womens shelter in recognition of Domestic Violence Awareness Month."
10
posted on
09/20/2006 5:33:22 PM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(CNN on Castro - Intestinal Crisis 2006: A People Mourn.)
To: NormsRevenge
God, why would any religion want to use a government anything?
11
posted on
09/20/2006 5:34:50 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: PghBaldy
correction- that wasn't a court case, but it would probably be allowed by this court... It seems the 1st Amendment is ONLY about some speech, and not religion.
12
posted on
09/20/2006 5:35:11 PM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(CNN on Castro - Intestinal Crisis 2006: A People Mourn.)
To: Viking2002
One can imagine the popularity of an initiative, if the process existed at the federal level, proposing that the jurisdiction of the 9th Circus extends only to the interior space of the court house in San Francisco, in which it conducts official business.
To: NormsRevenge
why do I have this feeling I'm being choked?
14
posted on
09/20/2006 5:38:43 PM PDT
by
air pappy
(one last chance)
To: NormsRevenge
Also from the 9th curcuit
In a decision Wednesday by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which could be used to force election officials throughout the state to require multiple-language petitions for ballot issues according to voting-rights advocates.
15
posted on
09/20/2006 5:45:56 PM PDT
by
ThomasThomas
(I did use spell check!)
To: kromike
Bet they won't ~ but they won't do it again.
16
posted on
09/20/2006 5:50:21 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Viking2002
This decision won't destroy anything because it'll be overturned easily.
17
posted on
09/20/2006 5:53:12 PM PDT
by
Gone GF
To: Maceman
"I guess that means they can bar environmental meetings too, since they are also faith based."
As are many NA meetings.
18
posted on
09/20/2006 5:54:10 PM PDT
by
Gone GF
To: NormsRevenge
Well of course! Our constitution calls for freedom FROM religion doesn't it? /sarcasm
Would Muslims be barred as well I wonder?
To: NormsRevenge
Shouldn't the people who pay taxes to build the libraries have some say in this or do we just have to do what three perverts in San Francisco (of all places) say? This isn't America. Seig Hiel!
20
posted on
09/20/2006 6:00:32 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(You can't defeat your enemy unless you are willing to get down in the mud with him.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson