Skip to comments.
Lt. Col. Bill Cowan to appear on WMAL 630 to discuss the credibility of the "Predator photo"
WMAL ^
| Perdogg
Posted on 09/14/2006 3:22:54 AM PDT by Perdogg
Retired Marine Lt. Col. Bill Cowan to appear on WMAL 630 to discuss the credibility of the "Predator photo". "
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: billcowan; binladen; taliban; talibanfuneral
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
3. Get said jet over the target. We generally do not have jets flying around in circles over all of Afghanistan, burning lots of jet fuel, just in case a good target comes up.
We need to develop a "bomb truck" for situations like this where we have no air or ground defense threat. Take a good sized commercial jet, modify it to carry a range of internal ordinance including high speed cruise missiles or stand off attack missiles. Have them fly a racetrack over hot spotswhich at cruise and altitude is very fuel efficient. They would have great bomb loads, long loiter times and it would be cheap cheap cheap compared to our conventional bombers.
41
posted on
09/14/2006 5:46:28 AM PDT
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: mware
If I remember correctly, al queda hid in cemeteries in Iraq. I'm not sure if I remember any cemetery being blown up there. It's kinda the Mosque thing.
I think it would be frowned on IF it had occurred.
And for all we know, we had our dudes in the group. Perhaps the intelligence is worth more than the hit.
42
posted on
09/14/2006 5:46:58 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Sacajaweau
Col. Cowan said the it was an unarmed drone/predator.
To: Echo Talon
grrr, he said that it was an unarmed drone/predator, just now on Fox & Friends.
To: Echo Talon
So to clarify- the drone saw the target, but we did not have time to scramble and nail the target, correct?
The question remains- who was the first news org who said we don't target funerals? Who was behind making this look bad for the administration?
45
posted on
09/14/2006 5:57:41 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-prayers for the kidnapped Israeli Soldiers)
To: All
the only reason these things should be UNARMED is after they have delivered their payload. what is the point in having the damn things oooo looky a formation, man some ordanince would be nice!
46
posted on
09/14/2006 5:58:13 AM PDT
by
Kewlhand`tek
(Those that can't , Teach. Those that can't teach , Report)
To: Perdogg
Cowan was just on Fox & Friends.
He said (1) the drone was unarmed, (2) all up the chain of command wanted to attack, but they couldn't get a weaponized plane their fast enough.
But he also said up the chain of command were all livid that they didn't have authority to fire.
Steve Doocy countered with: NBC reports that the drone WAS armed with a missile.
Cowan says that is not true.
===
So, there are still unanswered questions about the incident or failure to make an incident.
47
posted on
09/14/2006 5:59:03 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
I would believe Bill Cowan over Steve Doocy any day.
48
posted on
09/14/2006 6:00:13 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(If you stay home in November, you will elect Pelosi speaker)
To: SE Mom
The Pentagon has plenty of Clintoids there.
49
posted on
09/14/2006 6:01:48 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(If you stay home in November, you will elect Pelosi speaker)
To: Bahbah
WMAL recently changed their coding for their stream.
You need the new one.
Try this [cut and paste it into your player]:
http://abcrad.wm.llnwd.net/abcrad_wmal
50
posted on
09/14/2006 6:03:15 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
Wow. Once again, the truth slips through the cracks..
51
posted on
09/14/2006 6:04:30 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-prayers for the kidnapped Israeli Soldiers)
To: SE Mom
It seems that nbc was the recipient of the original photo.
52
posted on
09/14/2006 6:07:38 AM PDT
by
maica
(9/11 was not “the day everything changed”, but the day that revealed how much had already changed.)
To: SE Mom
I think the television news outlets got the information for the print outlets.
53
posted on
09/14/2006 6:09:28 AM PDT
by
mware
(Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
To: TomGuy
54
posted on
09/14/2006 6:09:41 AM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
To: maica; mware
So NBC gets the photo. Did they then conclude we don't target funerals? Did NBC make this ROE up out of thin air, or did an anonymous military official tell them that?
55
posted on
09/14/2006 6:19:15 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-prayers for the kidnapped Israeli Soldiers)
To: SE Mom
56
posted on
09/14/2006 6:23:26 AM PDT
by
TexKat
To: Perdogg; SE Mom
57
posted on
09/14/2006 6:25:57 AM PDT
by
TexKat
Lt. Tamara Lawrence, a spokeswoman with the U.S. military in Kabul, said the photograph was released to the network by someone who did not have the clearance to hand it out.
"It is an operational security issue and the photo was released at an inappropriate level," Lawrence told The Associated Press. "Inquiries are being made into how it was released."
Lawrence declined to provide further details. It was not clear when the photo was taken nor where the gathering took place.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,213641,00.html
58
posted on
09/14/2006 6:28:09 AM PDT
by
TexKat
To: TexKat
From the MSNBC article:
a coalition spokesperson said. A decision was made not to strike this group of insurgents at that specific location and time.
If a decision was made not to strike, then either coalition forces were close enough to strike or the drone was armed.
If the drone was not armed, why wouldn't the coalition spoksperson say that?
59
posted on
09/14/2006 6:31:12 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: SE Mom
With the attacks in the Congress on Rummy, I can guarantee, he will find out who leaked the photo and what it was described as by the leaker.
I got a feeling the media did their own interpretation of this photo.
60
posted on
09/14/2006 6:31:14 AM PDT
by
mware
(Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson