"...half ton of one of the world's most dangerous bomb-making materials" = ammonium nitrate
1 posted on
09/08/2006 5:28:22 PM PDT by
indcons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: indcons
Brian Ross never ceases to amaze me. White House, WHITE HOUSE, WHITE HOUSE!!!
2 posted on
09/08/2006 5:29:27 PM PDT by
msnimje
(What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
To: indcons
...ABC News team was able to purchase a half ton of one of the world's most dangerous bomb-making materials and move it into a storage shed only a few miles from the White House... ...and I'll bet they were just itching to use it.
3 posted on
09/08/2006 5:30:20 PM PDT by
infidel29
("The Democrat Party is like a mule. It has neither pride of ancestry nor hope of posterity.")
To: indcons
ABC report: 1/2 ton of ammonium nitrate and 10 tons of manure.
To: indcons
Yep - fertilizer - where did they buy it? ABC has the manpower to pbuy one bag at a time across the country and ship it all to DC.
So what? There are many types of bombs that can be made from ordinary materials - untraceable.
6 posted on
09/08/2006 5:32:44 PM PDT by
TimesDomain
(When a judge declares himself "MASTER", you become his "SLAVE")
To: indcons
Another Brian Ross exclusive!
7 posted on
09/08/2006 5:33:15 PM PDT by
toddlintown
(Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: indcons
I wonder why the DHS didn't threaten ABC's license before this report ran?
8 posted on
09/08/2006 5:34:00 PM PDT by
KoRn
To: indcons
Fertilizer. Next week ABC will by 10,000 pints of hydrogen peroxide and move it within visual range of an airport.
9 posted on
09/08/2006 5:35:02 PM PDT by
kinoxi
To: indcons
Storage shed as in mini warehouses? What does their lease say about that?
To: indcons
While I agree that buying large amounts should require a permit or some kind of oversight, it is still fertilizer primarily.
11 posted on
09/08/2006 5:35:26 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: indcons
Gasoline is fairly dangerous too. Time to restrict sales of this dangerous bomb making material too.
To: indcons
nothing new here folks...ABC has been making "BOMBS" for years..anyone seen their programming, or seen ratings?
Doogle
15 posted on
09/08/2006 5:37:19 PM PDT by
Doogle
(USAF 69-73...."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
To: indcons
That just makes me fell so safe, knowing our government is on top of things like this.
16 posted on
09/08/2006 5:37:21 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: indcons
Well gee, are they surprised? Afterall it is the liberals who don't want to step on anyone's rights you know. They have a right to buy bomb material and store it close to the White House doncha know!
17 posted on
09/08/2006 5:37:32 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(Leftists, the enemy within.)
To: indcons
To call ammonium nitrate "one of the world's most dangerous bomb-making materials" is yellow journalism.
Of course, journalists are not scientists or engineers. Ammonium nitrate is actually one of the world's safest bomb making materials.
To: indcons
Brainstorming for terrorists
To: indcons
Oh brother. (Rolling eyes.) Aren't you the brave ones.
To: indcons
Half a ton. That's...a thousand pounds? That's ten 100 pound bags of fertilizer bought in various places and brought together in DC? Do I have that right?
Are they aware that you can drive a car right into the city? Do they know that people just walk around in our nation's capitol?
22 posted on
09/08/2006 5:38:51 PM PDT by
prion
(Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
To: indcons
I was wondering whether it was fertilizer or gasoline. And what does this prove? Nothing.
To: indcons
Despite its use in the bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal Building, there are still no federal laws restricting the purchase of ammonium nitrate, >>>>
LOL, and after 9-11, there are still student visas, open borders to both the north and south, the military is not being used to protect our borders despite the constitution mandating it. only 2% of our cargo is scanned and searched, old people are forced to be searched at the airports while dark males go right on by. Chemical companies, tanker trucks and tanker cars are not monitored or have enough security... etc...... no surprise from me.
24 posted on
09/08/2006 5:41:15 PM PDT by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
To: indcons
Having drawn heavy (and unfounded) fire for "The Path to 9/11", I assume this is ABC's way of being "fair and balanced".
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson