To: indcons
To call ammonium nitrate "one of the world's most dangerous bomb-making materials" is yellow journalism.
Of course, journalists are not scientists or engineers. Ammonium nitrate is actually one of the world's safest bomb making materials.
To: marktwain
In this case, journalists aren't journalists either. This ABC News team simply seems to be the advance guard for usual suspects - Bin Laden and co.
26 posted on
09/08/2006 5:41:39 PM PDT by
indcons
(FReepmail "indcons" to get on/off the Military History ping list)
To: marktwain
You are correct, they are much safer than TNT and you can shoot them with a high powered rifle without danger.
Most have to be set off by a primer.
The speed of detonation is much slower TNT.
76 posted on
09/08/2006 6:27:44 PM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: marktwain
To call ammonium nitrate "one of the world's most dangerous bomb-making materials" is yellow journalism As you pointed out, ammonium nitrate is not the most energetic explosive around. They would also need boosters and primers to set it off. I don't think that a thousand pounds of ANFO would be much of a threat to any building in Washington with todays security. All just a bunch of journalistic hype. Still, I wouldn't mind if BATF took a closer look at ABC News. I have suspected them of being a terrorist organization for some time. ;-)
To: marktwain
Of course, journalists are not scientists or engineers. Ammonium nitrate is actually one of the world's safest bomb making materials. Right. It's the fuel oil that's dangerous. I wonder how many gasoline stations are within a few miles of the white house.
To: marktwain
If you look at the educational requirements of journalism students it goes a long way in explaining some of the statements they put it print !
163 posted on
09/09/2006 3:43:31 PM PDT by
Reily
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson