Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC Said to Re-Edit Key Parts of 9/11 Show (Dems and Clinton censor ABC.)
New York Times ^ | 8/9/06 | PATRICK HEALY and JESSE McKINLEY

Posted on 09/08/2006 7:54:30 AM PDT by CometBaby

Under growing pressure from Democrats and aides to former President Bill Clinton, ABC is re-evaluating and in some cases re-editing crucial scenes in its new mini-series “The Path to 9/11” to soften its portrait of the Clinton administration’s pursuit of Osama bin Laden, according to people involved in the project. Among the changes, ABC is altering one scene in which an actor playing Samuel R. Berger, the former national security adviser, abruptly hangs up on a C.I.A. officer during a critical moment in a military operation, according to Thomas H. Kean, a consultant on the ABC project and co-chairman of the federal Sept. 11 commission. Mr. Berger has said that the scene is a fiction, and Mr. Kean, in an interview, said that he believed Mr. Berger was correct and that ABC was making appropriate changes.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911; abc; albore; algore; aretherenomen; aretherenomenleft; atabc; clinton; hitlery; howarddean; igor; johnkerry; kerry; kkklinton; klintoon; kusinich; pathto911; wob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: CT

bump


21 posted on 09/08/2006 8:06:03 AM PDT by Fighting Irish (Béagán agus a rá go maith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby
Democrats: Communist who support and forces censorship.

Or maybe Democrats: Can't take the truth.

Got them on the run. Now hit hard. Keep those basta@ds in the cess pool they created.

22 posted on 09/08/2006 8:06:31 AM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

Of course, the NYT prefers to believe Sandy Burglar, a man who was filmed stuffing secret documents related to exactly this issue down his pants.


23 posted on 09/08/2006 8:08:24 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby
I have no love for ABC or any of the networks.

However, the fighting between the compassionate sissy's being the Democrats on the far left and ABC on the left is just plain fun to watch.

I thought liberals led by Hairless Reid was for openness and freedom of speech.

God Help AMERICA If The Democrats Win A Majority.
24 posted on 09/08/2006 8:08:34 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia now a certified socialist state reporting to Mexico City for further instructions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Mr. Berger has said that the scene is a fiction, and Mr. Kean, in an interview, said that he believed Mr. Berger was correct

And of course ABC was intimidated even though Sandy Berger is a convicted fellon who stole classified documents from the National Archives. Yep, we can count on Berger's memory and integrity. /vomit

25 posted on 09/08/2006 8:08:37 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PogySailor

That is exactly what they should do. They should demand that Disney edit anything to do with the Bush Admin. to their liking.
Get the ball rolling. You know the MSM would not be able to hold their tounge if W demanded an edit taht was kind to him.


26 posted on 09/08/2006 8:09:18 AM PDT by Holicheese (Beerfest could be the greatest movie ever made!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby

You have to parse this all out.

The Clintons aren't saying that they weren't at fault. They are saying that things like Sandy Berger slamming the phone down are inaccurate and want it edited out. Of course ABC will have to take out the entire call, which is what protects the Clintons.

This is the way they work. Look at what happened with Coulters book.. The RATS didn't go nuts because Ann called them Godless, they went nuts because she called the Jersey Girls attention hounds.

They are discrediting the writer, not the content.


27 posted on 09/08/2006 8:10:08 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Mediacrat - A leftwing editorialist who pretends to be an objective journalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Seriously, I actually rarely watch prime time programming. If there is something worth watching, I TiVO it for viewing when it is convenient for me. Forgive my sarcasm without properly tagging it.


28 posted on 09/08/2006 8:10:19 AM PDT by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kromike

I had planned on watching this. because of all the publicity the Dems gave it by crying. Now I think i will pass, I am not interested in a program censored by the democrat party.


29 posted on 09/08/2006 8:10:51 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

It worked when the Clinton Cult attacked Ken Starr, so why wouldn't it work now?


30 posted on 09/08/2006 8:11:23 AM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I'll wait and see the movie. They can only edit so much and the movie is primarily about Clintons 8 years in office. It's not like they have actors on a film set today saying new lines. I will however buy the directors cut if it becomes available

Agreed! One thing that leads me to believe that ABC may not do wholesale revisions on the film is the sagging popularity of Hillary in Democrat circles. There may be those at ABC who will see this as a chance to kill her Presidential aspirations, without taking the entire Democratic Party down with her. In any event the Democrats who are demanding the changes (and this is a story that has already hit the MSM newscasts) have already focused far more negative public attention on Clinton's failings than by simply allowing the movie's (reported) "a plague on both your (Democrat and Republican) Houses" tone would have done.

31 posted on 09/08/2006 8:12:03 AM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby
Its strange that the MSM don't realize that if the kind of government they are espousing becomes reality...the first thing to be eliminated is the FREE PRESS and FREE POLITICAL EXPRESSION. They are literally weaving the rope that will hang them. Idiots all!
32 posted on 09/08/2006 8:16:43 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby

anybody got a list of their adveretisers we can start hitting?


33 posted on 09/08/2006 8:16:54 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby

Disgusting.


34 posted on 09/08/2006 8:21:34 AM PDT by sandra_789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Dan Rather's disgraceful behavior is going to come to mind too. It is going to backfire on them. There is no honor among thieves.


35 posted on 09/08/2006 8:21:39 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby
(Palladino & Pellicano... Call Your Office.)
36 posted on 09/08/2006 8:21:43 AM PDT by End_Clintonism_Now (MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL CLINTON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby
Barf Alert..Did anyone who watched the appeasing performance of Chris Wallace this morning, defending these Clintonistas, come away with the same impression I did??
37 posted on 09/08/2006 8:24:30 AM PDT by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Not only that, but, in his "I made an honest mistake" public apology, he said specifically, that everything he had done had been to simply help the 9-11 commission.

Help them whitewash the whole matter of pre-911.

That's just my opinion.


38 posted on 09/08/2006 8:28:03 AM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie

I suspect that only things that can't be absolutely proven will be removed. That leaves an awfull lot that can be proven. Let's not forget that there were lots of people within the administration who were unhappy. Guys like Mansoor Ijaz and Louis Freeh even Richard Clarke has said some not so kind things about the Clinton administration.


39 posted on 09/08/2006 8:33:32 AM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
"You have my condolences. I watched it once, and it was 10 minutes of my life that I'll never get back."

I've never watched any of the series on any of the premium channels. When I was still a working soul, I was sitting in the lunchroom at work, with my back toward the television, reading a book and eating my supper. The guys I worked with (I'm an older female) were watching Sex in the City. I couldn't believe they actually paid people to write crap like that. I've never seen Law and Order, ER, 24, CSI or any of the other series shown on TV. Call me boring, but I'm into history and focus on programs that pertain to that.

40 posted on 09/08/2006 8:35:47 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson