Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: conservativecorner
You know, this should put the big chill into virtually everyone in this country. On the rare occasion when a network actually tries to air the truth, the 'Rat Mafia shuts it down and forces them to stop.
I've written to some of the addresses at ABC (posted elsewhere), and I will not be watching their Mock-umentary.
2 posted on
09/08/2006 7:52:17 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: conservativecorner
This move by Clinton will just remind the public about that time he wagged his finger at us while looking us straight in the eyes and lying.
To: conservativecorner
I suspect the entire Sandy Berger thang, socks and all, will end up on the cutting room floor.
4 posted on
09/08/2006 7:52:45 AM PDT by
truthkeeper
(It's the borders, stupid.)
To: conservativecorner
I guess the first question to ask is, what did Sandy Berger steal to protect the Clintons?
Wonder why the MSM is not asking?
5 posted on
09/08/2006 7:52:53 AM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(Mediacrat - A leftwing editorialist who pretends to be an objective journalist.)
To: conservativecorner
No different than the soviet union burning books.
6 posted on
09/08/2006 7:55:09 AM PDT by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: conservativecorner
All I can say is
BASTARDS!The Clintonistas for bringing the pressure and the weaklings at ABC for folding!
7 posted on
09/08/2006 7:55:34 AM PDT by
Rummyfan
To: conservativecorner
I keep reading the pathetic nonsense in the 9-11 report that they "saw no reason" to disbelieve the Clinton officials saying teh Monica Lewinsky scandal did not affect their decisions. No, no reason but obvious common sense. Clinton came back on a helicopter to announce launching (innefective) missiles within 24 hours of his angry anti- Ken Starr speech bombing out.
8 posted on
09/08/2006 7:55:40 AM PDT by
Williams
To: conservativecorner
Bias? Bias?!
The Democrats are so concerned about BIAS they'll squash free speech to avoid it?!
*Searches for duct tape to wrap head with*
9 posted on
09/08/2006 7:57:54 AM PDT by
Shion
(Jaded Southern Californian)
To: conservativecorner
This means that Clinton feels guilty that his open zipper helped kill thousands of Americans.
13 posted on
09/08/2006 7:59:42 AM PDT by
Leftism is Mentally Deranged
(American Left, Islamic Fascism, Mainstream Media = ideology of nihilism, despair, nothingness.)
To: conservativecorner
This is what we can expect if the Democrats win...Censorship, Threats.....and worse.
14 posted on
09/08/2006 8:00:30 AM PDT by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: conservativecorner
That's OK. The fact remains that the "debate" about Clinton's failures during the build-up to 9-11 is now a front burner issue in the news as the election season gears up.
Prior to this bru-ha-ha, that subject was way below the public radar screen.
So all in all, I'd say it's a win for our side, no matter what ABC does.
16 posted on
09/08/2006 8:01:53 AM PDT by
Maceman
(This is America. Why must we press "1" for English?)
To: conservativecorner
`ABC Changes 9/11 Show Under Pressure'
or
`ABC Sends Its Blue Dress to the Dry-cleaner'
19 posted on
09/08/2006 8:02:46 AM PDT by
tumblindice
(down the memory-tube with you, stubborn facts)
To: conservativecorner
Remember Bram Stoker's Dracula? The monster is raping the blood soaked girl in the garden and when discovered he says "Do not see me".
The democrats just looked us in the eye and did the same. And the republicans will look away.
20 posted on
09/08/2006 8:02:48 AM PDT by
Williams
To: conservativecorner
ABC News
47 W. 66th St. New York, NY 10023
http://www.abc.com If this company wants to alter history to assuage Bill Clinton, they are truly no longer trust worthy. Bill Clinton's eight years in office appeased the terrorists - there is no denying it.
21 posted on
09/08/2006 8:03:32 AM PDT by
yoe
To: conservativecorner
ABC changes 9/11 show under pressure
There is another loud, clear, ominous message in that headline:
If you think the Clintons are not powerful, watch what is happening. Remember that when you poo-poo the idea that Hillary Clinton will never be President. They have, quite possibly, the most powerful political machine ever. This skirmish is only a dusting of the war that will occur if any politician gets between Hillary and the WH in 08.
22 posted on
09/08/2006 8:03:41 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: conservativecorner
What scenes that the Dems have demanded be removed is there any evidence for that they ever occured? This is not about whether Clinton was distracted by the whole Lewinsky thing but the House of Representatives shares responsibility for that. This whole episode is beginning to sound like the Reagan movie a few years back.
27 posted on
09/08/2006 8:07:04 AM PDT by
Dave S
To: Howlin
Reports say that scene showed Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, Clinton's national security adviser, declining to give the order to kill bin Laden
Ya know .. I can't help but think there is more to this hoopla then just Sandy Burger
31 posted on
09/08/2006 8:09:54 AM PDT by
Mo1
(Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
To: conservativecorner
"Our docudrama was too long, anyway.," says ABC. "We only cut by an hour. Now it's just four hours long instead of five. Better for the viewing public that way. Now they can go to sleep earlier."
No big deal. Nothing to see here. Lock your doors and windows. Time to move on.
32 posted on
09/08/2006 8:10:05 AM PDT by
ex-Texan
(Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
To: conservativecorner
It's hard for me to believe that ABC, the Clintoon's network, would edit anything out that would hurt their lover boy. Maybe the editing was planned and all this crap is to peek interest so to get the border line conservatives Conservatives and the independents to watch. You know, I don't trust RATS and all their Hollywood jackasses they have in their pockets. ABC?????????? When the heck did they come over to the right side?
34 posted on
09/08/2006 8:18:44 AM PDT by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: conservativecorner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson