[Maceman]

That's OK. The fact remains that the "debate" about Clinton's failures during the build-up to 9-11 is now a front burner issue in the news as the election season gears up.

Prior to this bru-ha-ha, that subject was way below the public radar screen.

So all in all, I'd say it's a win for our side, no matter what ABC does.

[stockstrader]

I agree. Maybe now there will be some that actually ADDRESS the gross negligence and reckless disregard that the Clinton administration displayed on military and national security matters.

Up until now, Slick has been given a virtually FREE PASS!!!

[Eric in the Ozarks]

If we can keep it alive.

[Lou L]

So all in all, I'd say it's a win for our side, no matter what ABC does.

If they can intimidate ABC to remove undesirable scenes in this show, they can intimidate another publication or media outlet to show or tell any story they want.

My only question is, will any future historian be able to uncover the facts, or will all the damning evidence be destroyed by then? Will accounts of this event be backed by unquestionable proof, or will all we have are vague recollections and anecdotes? (For those that didn't react strongly to the story when it was reported, this is exactly why the story about Sandy Berger destroying files was so important.)