Skip to comments.
ABC Altering 9/11 Film After Clinton Officials Express Outrage
Fox News ^
| 9/8/06
Posted on 09/08/2006 6:14:38 AM PDT by pabianice
Edited on 09/08/2006 8:38:54 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
ABC is altering its upcoming miniseries "The Path to 9/11" in response to intense criticism from members of the Clinton administration that the two-part, made-for-TV film is filled with factual errors and lies, a network official reportedly said.
Three members of the administration former Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright, former National Security Adviser Samuel R. Berger and Clinton aide Bruce Lindsey, who now heads the Clinton Foundation said they sent letters to Walt Disney Company, parent of ABC, demanding that it re-edit or pull the five-hour film, scheduled for air Sunday and Monday nights without commercial interruption.
The Washington Post reported Friday that an ABC executive, who requested anonymity because the network is making only written comments, said small revisions have been underway for weeks.
Excerpt
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abctv; ahabandjezebel; aretherenomenleft; atabc; billingrecords; bluedressstain; censorship; chinesecampaignmoney; clintonistas; clintonsucks; demoalliesterrorists; freedomofspeech; impeachedexpresident; jimguytucker; liar; liberalmedia; maproom; mediamorons; mediawhores; monica; nazis; pathto911; roselawfirm; scumbag; sinkemperor; stainovaloffice; stalinism; thebentone; themeaningofis; traitors; travelgate; vincefoster; whileclintonslept
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 421-430 next last
To: ChadGore
You link just has the a comedy skit of a clinton puppet chasing women and then just has an olberman clip.
This is not the deleted scenes.
Is this some tacky sort of joke on your part?
DOES ANYONE HAVE THE LEGITIMATE DELETED SCENES? Olberman says ABC has already distributed to media people.
261
posted on
09/08/2006 8:00:54 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: pabianice
The spirit of Joseph Gobbels is alive and well in the Democratic party.
I wish I didn't have to write that, but it's true.
262
posted on
09/08/2006 8:01:02 AM PDT
by
jackieaxe
(Unsourced reporting is not reporting but a lie or a manipulation)
To: Dustbunny
"Hate to say this but with all this hype from the Clinton people we have decided to NOT watch the show."I'd rather watch the president's speech.
263
posted on
09/08/2006 8:01:13 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
To: political1
"They never intended in pinpointing Clinton. Just getting people on the right to view it. This is a two night deal, so they will leave a cliff hanger. Probably making everyone think on the first night that it's all Clintons fault. Then do the old bait and switch. On the second night it will become all Bush's fault."Agreed.
264
posted on
09/08/2006 8:02:18 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
To: amutr22; scott7278; All
'The Path to 9/11'
CLINTON FAILURE TO ORDER 'PURE KILL' CUT CHANCES OF GETTING BIN LADEN IN HALF bump
Here's my list on the clintons and terrorism:
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON part one by Mia T, 02.08.06
![](http://www.deletehillary.com/images/bill+hillary+osama.jpg)
WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN" (DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)
<![](http://www.deletehillary.com/images/clintonosamaF.jpg)
UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS "We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."
![](http://www.deletehillary.com/images/united93F.jpg)
CLINTON: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' (+ Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)
![](http://www.deletehillary.com/images/kill-em.jpg)
![](http://www.deletehillary.com/images/terrorism.gif)
WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM? Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?
IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY
BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE) THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS "We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."
ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE (and doesn't even know it)
MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' (+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)
WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN" (DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)
'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO. (HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT (TERRORISM) ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON (HEAR HILLARY IN SF)
HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION IN THE AGE OF CLINTON
THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY (DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) -- part1: clinton's "Brinkley" Lie
AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS (BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT)
PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE, 9/11 + KATRINA
Carpe Mañana: The (bill + hillary) clinton Terrorism Policy ('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')
CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES5
sandy berger haberdashery feint (the specs, not the pants or the socks)
CLINTON TREASON + THE GORELICK WALL
Reverse Gorelick
THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY: the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans
CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)
pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality (Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)
WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES (Please see post 65)
IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT (Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)
PINCH SULZBERGER, PEARL HARBOR + TREASON WHY WE MUST PROSECUTE THE NEW YORK TIMES
WHY BIN LADEN WANTS HOME DELIVERY OF THE NEW YORK TIMES
MORE
![](http://www.deletehillary.com/images/ittakesaclinton.jpg)
|
![](http://members.aol.com/mspeel5/moribundloserlogoXc.jpg)
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
265
posted on
09/08/2006 8:02:46 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: scott7278
Does anyone know how, as a citizen of the United States, to formally request an investigation into abuse of power and conduct unbecoming a senator for these five fools?No...but, ping me if you are anyone else has any info on how to do this, I'll do whatever I can to help. I totally agree with you.
266
posted on
09/08/2006 8:03:48 AM PDT
by
top 2 toe red
(To the enemy in Iraq..."Don't bet on American politics forcing my hand!" President Bush)
To: avital2
C E N S O R S H I P from the liberal, tolerant, free speech, open-minded Dems.
'nuff said.
and can't be said enough!
267
posted on
09/08/2006 8:03:50 AM PDT
by
bigjoesaddle
("Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke)
To: uncbob
I wonder seriously about one who, in the face of Democrat thuggery and censorship, and the obedience of the MSM, manages only to find fault with Republicans.
If I didn't know better, I'd think your didn't have your head on straight, uncbob.
Are you missing the big picture entirely here, or is your anti-Republican stance just to impress your non-conservative buddies and cohorts disguising themselves as patriots around here?
268
posted on
09/08/2006 8:04:17 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(George W. Bush - "Take his character all together, and we shall not look upon his like again.")
To: netmilsmom
As does FR, Little Green Footballs, Instapundit and Hot Air. That doesn't mean I don't enjoy them.
We ain't talking about your enjoying them we are talking about getting out the truth
IMHO after Rush's Drug Bust and last divorce his capability to get NEW listeners was dimished greatly so he ain't making many converts these days
269
posted on
09/08/2006 8:04:59 AM PDT
by
uncbob
To: pabianice
I am not surprised, just disgusted and fed-up. Same ol' same ol'.
270
posted on
09/08/2006 8:05:02 AM PDT
by
Mama_Bear
(My heroes wear camouflage)
To: wai-ming
"I was surprised that CNN would dare implicate Clinton, but they did.
Did the CNN program air in the U.S.? (I saw it while "overseas.") I would be curious as to people's reaction to the CNN documentary as well."
Don't you know why? Do I have to do everything here?!!! ha ha. Bottom line, the liberal democrats do not want Hillary or Bill back, which explains her shift to being leader of the senate. The chess pieces move around the board and Pelosi is salivating in the possibility of being 3rd in line for president.
271
posted on
09/08/2006 8:06:01 AM PDT
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?")
To: MinuteGal
272
posted on
09/08/2006 8:06:40 AM PDT
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?")
To: An Old Marine
It's not a chill, it's a blizzard and the snow is way high. Its not snow thats high!
INDEED!
I hope those of us who can will download the cut truth portions and distribute them on DVD to the moderates and remotely sane liberal idiots who might be persuaded by them.
273
posted on
09/08/2006 8:07:00 AM PDT
by
Quix
(LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
To: pabianice
You know, I wish I could be outraged, but this is just so darned predictable. And most of the sheeple are right in line behind Bubba...or bent over in front of him.
To: El Gato
Bootleg distribution is inevitable. The Clintonistas will be fighting youtube.com & other online video P2Ps within weeks if not days.
This will be very instructive to "conservatives". It will be a preview of how the left will try to clampdown on the Internet - as well as talk radio - if they are allowed to take power. But I guess some will say this will ONLY spite the republican politicians.
275
posted on
09/08/2006 8:08:54 AM PDT
by
drpix
To: angkor
Hey, it's fiction, right?
As long as we are talking fiction:
ABC is yanking Bubba's chains about the changes.
They will show the movie in it's orginal form.
The first words of the President's address Monday night will be:
"PSYCH!", followed by the Presidential snicker we love so well.
To: uncbob
I might add this reminds me of the great Hue and Cry here about demanding to see Clinton's supposed blow up at the perjury trial testimony
"Everyone was thinking 'we finally got him'
"Remember what that trurned out to be
"Clinton and Hillary aren't going down to any efforts of the MSM
"Get over it" HUH! Kindly tell us plebes exactly which branch of the United States government threatened exactly WHICH TV network over that?
Also, I didn't pray he'd have some kind of conversion, though I sincerely hoped he'd recover from surgery. You need a smaller brush.
277
posted on
09/08/2006 8:09:55 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
To: danamco
And he basically got away with everything on your list.
Look at how the media fawn all over him, even now.
Look at how his cronies run to the microphones/camera at every hint of criticism of his administration.
Look at how the libDems run to defend him at every opportunity.
Look at how even the current President and his father interact with the Disgraced, Disbarred, and Impeached.
For your list, so what -- they got away with -- and still are.
[Sad state of affairs, isn't it.]
278
posted on
09/08/2006 8:11:02 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: dfwgator
We quit DH last year because it turned incredibly stupid and numbskullingly boring.
But, dammit, Lost is on ABC, too.
279
posted on
09/08/2006 8:11:27 AM PDT
by
top 2 toe red
(To the enemy in Iraq..."Don't bet on American politics forcing my hand!" President Bush)
To: ohioWfan
Been around here longer than you
First order of business in making changes is recognizing what the REAL situation is NOT keeping one's head in the sand
You think the Dems would have left a Sandy Berger like situation go unexploited
How about the Guard document forgeries
How would the dems have handled that
And waht about the farce of a 911 hearing --Tell me again who is in the majority in congress- OH Yeah the GOP
280
posted on
09/08/2006 8:11:33 AM PDT
by
uncbob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 421-430 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson