Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inside the Camp Pendleton 8
Townhall Daily ^ | Thursday, August 31, 2006 | Rick Amato

Posted on 09/01/2006 10:19:01 AM PDT by StarCMC

 

They've been shackled in chains and held in solitary confinement, their defense attorneys have been denied access to key evidence of the case and now their right to request a waiver of a pre-trial hearing — known as an article 32 — has also been denied. Such has been the treatment of the men known as the Pendleton 8 in their quest to receive a fair, impartial hearing with a true presumption of innocence.

The Pendleton 8 are seven Marines and a naval corpsman being held in a brig at Camp Pendleton while waiting trial on charges of kidnapping and murder. On April 26, they were on an ambush mission in Hamdania, Iraq, designed to snare known local insurgents. The men are charged with allegedly taking an Iraqi villager, 52-year-old Hashim Ibrahim Awad, from his home, kidnapping him, placing him in a hole, shooting him repeatedly and staging the scene to make it appear he was an insurgent planting a bomb. The defendants deny the charges and claim they followed the rules of engagement. The federal government thus far has denied their defense attorneys access to evidence of the crime scene. Allegations are based upon witness accounts of Mr. Awad's neighbors. This case is separate from Haditha, Iraq, case.

"The Article 32 hearing is a sham," said defense attorney Jane Siegal, who represents PFC. John Jodka III. "Because the government has denied our opportunity to waive the 32, it is costing the Jodka family tens of thousands of additional dollars in legal fees. All this so the government can parade its coerced statements in front of the media. Coerced statements paraded in front of the media which will potentially pollute the jury pool."

Ms. Siegal's strategy to waive the article 32 hearing and go directly to trial was based upon her belief that the case is certain to go to trial anyway, so why waste time and money with a pre-trial.

As to the allegation of coerced statements, Pfc. Jodka's father, John Jr., described to me the psychological torture he believes his 20-year-old son has endured:

"Immediately after my son was removed from the war zone, literally moments after his rifle was removed from his hands, he was placed in a room for 7 to 7.5 hours — no food, no water, no sleep — and he was told that he was a murderer. They hammered away at him to give statements of what it was they wanted to hear."

Mr. Jodka visits his son every Saturday at the Camp Pendleton brig while balancing his career and family obligations. "JJ has looked me straight in the eye and told me his 100 percent innocent. He continues to maintain his faith in the system and believes the truth will eventually come out."

Said Ms. Seigel of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service: "NCIS was on a mission to place blame and not find the truth. They wanted to make sure that Hamdania did not mimic Haditha. America needs to know that 'there are all kinds of rubber hoses' in the offices at NCIS, and that statements can be extracted from prisoners by using intimidation tactics other than physical force. Ask NCIS why they keep rubber hoses in their offices, and why they think it's funny?"

I did. I called NCIS and asked if rubber hoses were located in their offices and if so, why? NCIS at Camp Pendleton referred me to NCIS headquarters in Washington. NCIS headquarters in Washington told me I would receive an e-mail statement over the weekend. I have yet to receive it. Meanwhile, Ms. Siegal will enter in to evidence a photograph taken at NCIS-Camp Pendleton of a rubber hose on a white board, with the words "my psychological friend" written underneath.

Public perception has been another problem for the imprisoned Marines. First off, with the busy lives we live these days how many people know a Haditha from a Hamdania? Secondly, there is the steady rhetoric of Rep. John Murtha, Pennsylvania Democrat, and the New York Times along with the absolute deafening silence of Republican members of Congress. If it weren't for conservative radio talk-show host Michael Savage and journalist Michelle Malkin there would be no other high-profile voices to counter Mr. Murtha and the NYT.

The government has just completed the construction of a brand new $800k media center at Camp Pendleton. Will this be the scene of a fair, impartial hearing with a true presumption of innocence? Or will this be the scene of a government bent on proving to the world it has the ability to police its own internal affairs? A lot is at stake here. The lives of eight young men are at stake.

Possibly too is the morale of our military. As former marine Leo Chapinsky wrote in this e-mail to me: They recruit you. They train you. They teach you to kill. You kill the enemy and you get treated like the Pendleton 8? Is it any wonder the Marine Corps needs to call up reservists to active duty?

 

Rick Amato is a San Diego-based radio talk-show host, political commentator and frequent guest on cable TV news programs. His blog can be reached at http://rickamato.townhall.com Article reprinted from 8-30-06 Washington Times



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: pendelton8; traitormurtha
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: North Coast Conservative

Hey, good plug for the rally! ;-)


21 posted on 09/01/2006 11:49:20 AM PDT by Coop (No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
February 26, 1993.

"Hey, P," he gasped. "Terrorists exploded a bomb in the parking garage of the World Trade Center's North Tower. Six people KIA and over one thousand wounded."

I wouldn't see the pictures until our next port, but the thought of choking office workers, their faces stained with soot, streaming out of the building drove me to a furious outburst.

~~

And then I thought about the cocky response I'd give the Israeli sniper.

I thought of my father the tour guide who went to the towers once a week. I dreamt of my mother in her Midtown office trying frantically to find a staircase as smoke and fire consumed her. But I shrugged off the terrorist attack as an isolated incident. An anomoly.

WARLORD NO BETTER FRIEND NO WORSE ENEMY - page 52 - Ilario Pantano

22 posted on 09/01/2006 11:58:28 AM PDT by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )?

Did you forget the Commander In Chief? You know the guy who could change all this with a simple order to the inferior officers.

23 posted on 09/01/2006 12:02:17 PM PDT by itsahoot (The home of the Free, Because of the Brave (Shamelessly stolen from a Marine))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

bttt


24 posted on 09/01/2006 12:03:09 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: StarCMC

MRGA DITTOS TO THAT!!Imagine the caterwauling from THE LEFTIES if those TERRORISTS at Club Gitmo were treated like this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


25 posted on 09/01/2006 12:05:49 PM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: North Coast Conservative
In honor of your tag line:

26 posted on 09/01/2006 12:16:11 PM PDT by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
As someone else pointed out, the Article 32 does give the defense a chance to see at least some of the prosecutions case and I agree with them that only a fool of a defense lawyer would pass up the opportunity to do that.

Maybe the defense is setting up an "ineffective counsel" appeal.

27 posted on 09/01/2006 12:23:06 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freema

Bump to that -- you're so right!


28 posted on 09/01/2006 12:39:23 PM PDT by StarCMC ("So what was the price to betray us - Judas?" - SGT Mark Russak to Traitor Murtha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Airborne1986
I can't think of a good reason for a defendant to waive the 32.

I'm a former cop, and I can think of just one such case: the defense is certain that it's a slam-dunk conviction, so they want to have an appealable issue from the get-go. The problem is, the appeal would be based on the defense counsel alleging that they were ineffective and/or incompetent.

29 posted on 09/01/2006 12:50:19 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

This is not a civil court. The defendants can choose their own civilian counsel if they wish but they will also be assigned a military lawyer. "Ineffective counsel" won't be considered. Sounds more like the civilian lawyer has her own agenda she wants to push and is using the defendants to further it.


30 posted on 09/01/2006 1:10:15 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Sounds more like the civilian lawyer has her own agenda she wants to push and is using the defendants to further it.

There's a possibility, all right. But what agenda would be served by getting her clients convicted?

31 posted on 09/01/2006 1:31:07 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
There's a possibility, all right. But what agenda would be served by getting her clients convicted?

I think her agenda is her, and her belief is no publicity is bad publicity. Judging from her remarks she seems out to damage or destroy any confidence or trust that the Marine Corps will conduct a fair hearing or, if the evidence justifies it, a fair trial. Destroying confidence in your commanders is not conducive to good morale.

32 posted on 09/01/2006 1:47:24 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Judging from her remarks she seems out to damage or destroy any confidence or trust that the Marine Corps will conduct a fair hearing or, if the evidence justifies it, a fair trial.

That was the kind of crap that left-wing attorneys pulled in the 1960s and 1970s when they were representing clients that were guilty as sin--ensure that the "community" became convinced that "DA MAN!" was rigging the case.

Why do I find it so disturbing to see conservatives embracing this kind of thing?

33 posted on 09/01/2006 1:50:27 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Why do I find it so disturbing to see conservatives embracing this kind of thing?

I spent most of my adult life as a naval officer, active duty and reserve. And I can say without a moment's hesitation that if I were one of the defendants, and I was innocent, I would sleep soundly knowing that my fate was in the hands of a military court martial rather than a civilian judge and a civilian jury made up of people who can't wait to sell their story to 20/20.

34 posted on 09/01/2006 1:57:06 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: StarCMC

Bump!


35 posted on 09/01/2006 4:43:04 PM PDT by Fawnn (Canteen wOOhOO Consultant and CookingWithPam.com person - Faith makes things possible, not easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson