Posted on 09/01/2006 10:19:01 AM PDT by StarCMC
---------------
Murtha is a traitorous sack of excrement.
Ping
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
These brave Marines need our support. I feel they are being railroaded by PC talking heads within the USMC and Sen. Murtha
This sentence is the one that makes me sickest. Blech!!
Heroes are shackled amd chained while cowards like murtha, clintoon, and deserters are praised and worshipped by politicians and the media.
What was that about freedom needing the blood of patriots to be refreshed? Maybe so ...
"The government has just completed the construction of a brand new $800k media center at Camp Pendleton. Will this be the scene of a fair, impartial hearing with a true presumption of innocence?"
A reverse nuremburg. "We trained you to kill, why did you do it?"
Are the soldiers allowed access to an attorney? What are the reasons that access to evidence is denied? Doesn't this have to be entered to be considered?
"Ms. Siegal's strategy to waive the article 32 hearing and go directly to trial was based upon her belief that the case is certain to go to trial anyway, so why waste time and money with a pre-trial."
This is a strange "strategy." Article 32 hearings are free discovery for defendants. They get a preview of the Governent's case. Defendants get to examine witnesses under oath, find out what they will say and lock them into their stories. Those are good things for a defendant. Unless it is part of a plea deal, I can't think of a good reason for a defendant to waive the 32.
Thanks for that -- I couldn't remember who to ping on this one.
No problemo, I'm gonna ping freema and racebannon for more ping firepower.
An Article 32 hearing is like a grand jury indictment. It's for the prosectution to demonstrate that they have sufficient evidence to justify a trial. As with civilian grand juries, the prosecution doesn't need to present all it's evidence or even most of its evidence. It need present only enough to make it's case that a trial is justified. If a trial is granted then the prosecution has to disclose its evidence to the defense. As someone else pointed out, the Article 32 does give the defense a chance to see at least some of the prosecutions case and I agree with them that only a fool of a defense lawyer would pass up the opportunity to do that.
Pinging a few friends.
Ya know, after I got to the 6th paragragh I had to force myself to read the rest. I was so enraged, where is Human Rights Watch et al? Our enemies are not allowed to be treated as bad as they are treating these soldiers.
I read this past week that the villagers did not report any of this until a week later at a meeting. All these accusations on the part of the Iraqi villagers and nobody saw an urgency to tell someone sooner? It's like an after thought, "Oh yeah, by the way, the Americans kidnapped a man an put him in a hole and shot him. Who's supposed to bring the refreshments for next weeks meeting?" It just doesn't make any sense to me.
Semper Fidelis. Always Faithful.
BTTT
That's not the sentence that makes me the sickest-this one is:
The lives of eight young men are at stake.
The only thing the author failed to mention was that these lives were at stake in Iraq, and now in America.
Support the presumption of innocence for the Pendleton 8 and Boot Murtha.
The BootMurtha rally will be a good place to wear it.
I can't believe that the Corps would be an active partner in this lynching, but I guess the sickness that is Liberalism permeates everything, (including the Corps), like stink on a skunk.
In God We Trust
..Semper Fi!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.