Posted on 08/30/2006 12:57:41 PM PDT by nickcarraway
This just proves that the study is part of the conspiracy. :-)
ROFL! How do I get a job that pays big bucks for writing lengthy studies on the obvious????
My first proposed topic will be a study of whether the sun rises in the east.
Do they have a reasonable explanation for WTC7 coming down in less than 10 seconds without taking a direct hit from a plane or having any major fires?
A year or two ago a group of us were on a tour of NIST (a member of my committee works there, in fact in the Building and Fire Research Laboratory) and saw many of the beams from the Towers laid out there. Sobering.
Nothing will ever shut these people up.
Actually, sun doesn't rise. It looks like it is rising from certain points of earth at certain time.
You're nuts.
"without taking a direct hit from a plane or having any major fires"
Ummm you might want to check your facts again. There was a major fire in the building and did you forget the thousands of pounds of debris that fell on to Blg. 7?
Firemen gave testimony that loud pops and creaks were being heard from the building and the order was given to pull back because of eminent collapse.
"or having any major fires?"
Better check on that one. There was a major fire on Floor 5 (I think) due to tenant's backup generator diesel tanks, plus a huge diesel tank on a lower floor that pumped diesel up to Floor 5.
The fire burned out of control for hours, and firefighters made no serious attempt to extinguish it, they had bigger fish to fry.
Yes. George Bush himself lit the fuse on a gigantic stick of dynamite. I heard a guy on Art Bell (he was on the radio, so he must be credible) who saw Bush and Cheney sneaking around the WTC just hours before the "attacks."
/tinfoil hat-wearing nutcase mode
just guessing here... did the 110 story building falling on it help?
Great post
Yes.
Wikipedia entry on "True Believers" outlines a similar syndrome in another area of belief. It is much like Bush Hatred Syndrome...you begin with the belief that Bush is evil, and then pile up "facts" to support what you believe. People may disprove individual facts, but to the "True Believer", there is always something formed in a "yeah, BUT"-tal that veers away and starts the cycle again. When faced with contradictory fact, a True Believer will just latch onto another set of facts, because the truth, that their basic supposition is flawed, cannot be examined.
Do you have a reasonable explanation for why the "Bush Conspiracy" demolished WTC7? Wouldn't it look kind of suspicious to demolish a building that had not taken a direct hit from a plane or had any major fires?
But.. but.. that guy with the rabbit hutch!!
This kind of wild-eyed assertion shows that my study needs to be done.
It was suspicious that it came down so fast......how do you explain it?
Based on asking a question?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.