Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: american spirit

You're nuts.


8 posted on 08/30/2006 1:07:34 PM PDT by Rocko (Lamont is gonna be pounded like a cheap cutlet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Rocko

Based on asking a question?


20 posted on 08/30/2006 1:27:57 PM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Rocko; american spirit
OK, he's nuts. So let me ask you: Do you have a reasonable explanation for why a 46 floor 600 ft tall building like WTC 7, which was shielded by WTC 5 and 6 (both of which had extensive fire damage but did not collapse), collapsed in and on itself even though it was not hit by a plane and only had minor fires on only two of it's floors?

Do you have a reasonable explanation as to why all of the videos of this implosion show small dark squibs racing "up" the building "before" the collapse?

I'm sure that you have researched all of this yourself though, haven't you?

As an aside, I don't know of any major researcher/critic of the 9/11 Commission (and/or the official explanation) claiming "missiles" hit the trade center. That is clearly a straw man hit piece much like Chertoff's Popular Mechanics famous "debunking" issue was (they debunked their own characterizations).

140 posted on 08/30/2006 3:43:59 PM PDT by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson