[muryan]

I understand the complaint, but because of his stance on condoms...? I think thats one thing the catholic church needs to change its stance on. Being anti-contraceptive is something that is going to turn away my younger generation on a consistent basis.

[ladtx]

I think thats one thing the catholic church needs to change its stance on.

That will never happen. One would think that people should conform to the Church; the Church should not conform to the whims of the people.

[presidio9]

I think thats one thing the catholic church needs to change its stance on. Being anti-contraceptive is something that is going to turn away my younger generation on a consistent basis.

Two questions:

Are you a Catholic?
Do you understand why the Church opposes birth control?

[netmilsmom]

>>Being anti-contraceptive is something that is going to turn away my younger generation on a consistent basis.<<

LOLOLOLOL!

Come to my parish!!! Your eyes will be openned!
Young people are discovering that they are very blessed when open to life. The average in our parish is 4 children but 10 and 12 are not unknown.
We have been told for years that you "Can't" afford to raise more than two kids. If one breastfeeds, the cost of another child is in the diapers. All clothes are recycled, toys are recycled.

I think you've been listening to the MSM too long!

And there is nothing better than a house full of people who love you!

[Tax-chick]

Being anti-contraceptive is something that is going to turn away my younger generation

Not a bit of it, although to the extent that young (or old) people are pro-contraceptive, that's a sign that they need to be catechised and, above all, evangelized.

The prophets used a figure of speech, "uncircumcised in mind and heart," to describe Jews whose "faith" didn't reach into the nitty-gritty of their lives. It might be more useful today to say "contraceptive in mind and heart," unwilling to give and receive life.

[linda_22003]

Or, they can just quietly ignore the Church's teachings on the subject, as previous generations have done.

[armydoc]

I understand the complaint, but because of his stance on condoms...? I think thats one thing the catholic church needs to change its stance on. Being anti-contraceptive is something that is going to turn away my younger generation on a consistent basis.

Do you really think that the Church's teachings on this matter are turning people away? The stats suggest otherwise:

Confirming the results of earlier polls, dissent from Catholic teaching was most pronounced in the responses to a question on contraception. To the statement, "it is morally wrong to use artificial methods of birth control", 57 percent strongly disagreed, and another 16 percent mildly disagreed, yielding an overall 73 percent rejection of Catholic teaching.
http://www.adoremus.org/397-Roper.html

The Roman Catholic Church is the only major faith institution in the U.S. to forbid the use of contraception. However, most Catholics disagree with the prohibition; 75% of Catholic women of childbearing age who are sexually active use a contraceptive method forbidden by the church, according to the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
http://www.rcrc.org/calltojustice/religion_contraception.php


Catholics, at least American Catholics, seem to have no problem warming the pews while thumbing their nose at Church teachings. The inaction of the Church hierarchy suggests that they have no major problem with the situation, either. Protestants are often ridiculed regarding their "10,000" denominations, while Catholics are supposedly united in one Faith. Hardly. Rather, the diversity of Catholic beliefs is quietly tolerated. There are at least 10,000 "denominations" within Catholicism.

[franky]

A short historical perspective.

What contraception has wrought:

The first true test for contraception was in the Griswold v. Baird decision that made contraception legal 40 years ago. It was at that time that not only was contraception legal throughout the U. S., a whole new philosophy sprung up. The philosophy of "free sex" or what is called "Family Planning".

Under the guise of "Family Planning", it was not until the mid 1960s and 1970s that these philosophers really started to manifest themselves. What is coincidental and significant is that during that time moral degeneration, led by such happenings as Woodstock, Timothy Leary’s free drugs and many other things, the United States’ social mores started to decline to what we have today.

A question arose at the time: Did this same family planning and contraceptive society thinking cause the United States’ social mores to decline to today’s lows or is it all just coincidence ? If it is coincidence then the following must be coincidental:

-As divorce is above 50% of all marriages, it was reported by Creighton University’s Center for Marriage and Family, “That the main causes for divorce are infidelity, and frequency of sexual relations were of greatest concern to those ages 29 and under.”

-Other startling statistics show children of divorce are twice as likely to drop out of school as those from intact homes.

-Children of divorce (whose parents divorced while they were children) are 62% more likely than children of non-divorced parents to no longer identify with the faith of their parents when they grow up. Divorced adults quadrupled from 4.3 million in 1970 to 17.4 million in 1994."

Is it not strange that contraception runs parallel to the Country's moral decay?

A contraceptive society certainly takes away what is Gods and surely breaks the first commandment when man uses his own capacities to play God. It is why contraception will never work.