Skip to comments.
Boycott Clinton speech, Catholic bishop says
CBC ^
| Thu, 24 Aug 2006
Posted on 08/24/2006 6:37:10 AM PDT by presidio9
A southern Ontario bishop is urging Catholics to boycott an upcoming fundraiser featuring former U.S. president Bill Clinton, saying his views don't reflect the church's beliefs.
Clinton is set to deliver a speech Nov. 8 during a $500-per-seat fundraising lunch for the Catholic Family Counselling Centre in Kitchener.
But Rev. Gerard Bergie, the auxiliary bishop of the Roman Catholic diocese of Hamilton, says Clinton is an inappropriate guest speaker, the Waterloo Region Record reported.
Clinton's support for abortion, his marital infidelity and promotion of condom use to prevent the spread of AIDS go against Catholic Church doctrine, said Bergie.
He says he's received complaints from Catholics across the country.
"They find it difficult to reconcile the fact that an organization that calls itself Catholic has extended an invitation to an individual whose views
go against the Catholic church," he told the newspaper.
Cathy Brothers, a spokeswoman for the centre, said it is a non-denominational agency and that the fundraiser is "not about our Catholicism."
Clinton is a regular on the guest-speaker circuit, drawing as much as $350,000 per speech. Brothers wouldn't say how much it cost to bring Clinton to Kitchener.
The counselling centre plans to use the money raised to expand services for victims of domestic abuse.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 60yearoldadolescent; ahab; clintonvsthechurch; impeachedexpresident; liar; slick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: presidio9; american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
21
posted on
08/24/2006 7:28:58 AM PDT
by
NYer
("That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah." Hillel)
To: yoe
Big difference #1 (there are many): If this were an Ayatollah, all those attending would be beheaded.
To: yoe
Absolutely - when you give up on principles, all else is just opinion, leading to moral relativism.
23
posted on
08/24/2006 7:36:10 AM PDT
by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: muryan; Tax-chick
>>Being anti-contraceptive is something that is going to turn away my younger generation on a consistent basis.<<
LOLOLOLOL!
Come to my parish!!! Your eyes will be openned!
Young people are discovering that they are very blessed when open to life. The average in our parish is 4 children but 10 and 12 are not unknown.
We have been told for years that you "Can't" afford to raise more than two kids. If one breastfeeds, the cost of another child is in the diapers. All clothes are recycled, toys are recycled.
I think you've been listening to the MSM too long!
And there is nothing better than a house full of people who love you!
24
posted on
08/24/2006 7:36:32 AM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
To: yoe
Well, the Bishop's job is to act as a shepherd for his flock. If that comes across as an "edict", it's one that has no force of compulsion for the general populace and not even on a lot of Catholics. If the agency didn't call itself "Catholic", that would be a different story. What if some group advertised itself as the "Baptist Pedophile Society" or the "Methodist Jihad Group", wouldn't the leaders of those denominations be correct to publicly announce that those groups weren't representing the teachings of the respective churches?
To: yoe
26
posted on
08/24/2006 7:49:50 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Pay attention.)
To: muryan; netmilsmom; Mrs. Don-o
Being anti-contraceptive is something that is going to turn away my younger generation Not a bit of it, although to the extent that young (or old) people are pro-contraceptive, that's a sign that they need to be catechised and, above all, evangelized.
The prophets used a figure of speech, "uncircumcised in mind and heart," to describe Jews whose "faith" didn't reach into the nitty-gritty of their lives. It might be more useful today to say "contraceptive in mind and heart," unwilling to give and receive life.
27
posted on
08/24/2006 7:50:08 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(Mother of a horde: it's not just an adventure - it's a job!)
To: yoe
Hmmm.... Are you suggesting that ayatollahs now support honest religious labeling, truth-in-advertising, and voluntary boycotts, to achieve their goals?
If that's the case, I'd say you've run into a better grade of ayatollah than most of us are familiar with.
28
posted on
08/24/2006 7:57:46 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Kinder, gentler ayatollah. What a concept!)
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: yoe
This site has really come full circle.
Years ago, we (rightly) denounced Bill Clinton in unison.
Now, we have people defending Bill Clinton against the Catholic Church.
Just wonderful.
30
posted on
08/24/2006 8:02:33 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
(Newt '08!)
To: B Knotts
Maybe some people find Bill Clinton's lifestyle worthy of imitation.
31
posted on
08/24/2006 8:04:22 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(Mother of a horde: it's not just an adventure - it's a job!)
To: muryan
Or, they can just quietly ignore the Church's teachings on the subject, as previous generations have done.
To: Suzy Quzy
You wrote:
"OMG!! Cathy, you better examine your conscience for inviting Bill Clinton to a CATHOLIC anything....you are dancing on the trap door of hell. I don't know about dancing on the trap door of hell, but I'd say she's definitely cha-chaing with a charlatan --- swinging with a satyr ---
33
posted on
08/24/2006 8:07:57 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Waltzing with a Wolf .)
To: presidio9
"Clinton is set to deliver a speech Nov. 8 during a $500-per-seat fundraising lunch for the Catholic Family Counselling Centre in Kitchener. "
FAMILY COUNSELING????!!!!!!
What a laugh.
What moron or groups of morons invited this serial sexual predator to such an event?
His view of Family Planning is to have sex with any attractive or semi-attractive female he can intimidate or seduce.
34
posted on
08/24/2006 8:12:43 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: muryan
I understand the complaint, but because of his stance on condoms...? I think thats one thing the catholic church needs to change its stance on. Being anti-contraceptive is something that is going to turn away my younger generation on a consistent basis.
Do you really think that the Church's teachings on this matter are turning people away? The stats suggest otherwise:
Confirming the results of earlier polls, dissent from Catholic teaching was most pronounced in the responses to a question on contraception. To the statement, "it is morally wrong to use artificial methods of birth control", 57 percent strongly disagreed, and another 16 percent mildly disagreed, yielding an overall 73 percent rejection of Catholic teaching.
http://www.adoremus.org/397-Roper.html
The Roman Catholic Church is the only major faith institution in the U.S. to forbid the use of contraception. However, most Catholics disagree with the prohibition; 75% of Catholic women of childbearing age who are sexually active use a contraceptive method forbidden by the church, according to the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
http://www.rcrc.org/calltojustice/religion_contraception.php
Catholics, at least American Catholics, seem to have no problem warming the pews while thumbing their nose at Church teachings. The inaction of the Church hierarchy suggests that they have no major problem with the situation, either. Protestants are often ridiculed regarding their "10,000" denominations, while Catholics are supposedly united in one Faith. Hardly. Rather, the diversity of Catholic beliefs is quietly tolerated. There are at least 10,000 "denominations" within Catholicism.
35
posted on
08/24/2006 8:17:05 AM PDT
by
armydoc
To: Tax-chick
The prophets used a figure of speech, "uncircumcised in mind and heart," to describe Jews whose "faith" didn't reach into the nitty-gritty of their lives. It might be more useful today to say "contraceptive in mind and heart," unwilling to give and receive life. Excellent point! I promise to plagiarize it and use it widely!
36
posted on
08/24/2006 8:49:59 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
No attribution needed :-).
37
posted on
08/24/2006 8:53:10 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(Mother of a horde: it's not just an adventure - it's a job!)
To: armydoc
You wrote:
".. the diversity of Catholic beliefs is quietly tolerated. There are at least 10,000 "denominations" within Catholicism." Yes, and more's the pity. This reflects, on the part of the laity, infidelity to the faith and morals they supposedly profess every time they mouth the words of the Creed or renew their Baptismal Promises at Easter. The precise term for it is "religious hypocrisy," and it is clearly an ecumenical, inter-church phenomenon.
On the part of the lax clergy, who neither teach, govern, nor sanctify, this is all-of-the-above plus pastoral malpractice.
That's one of the reasons why the greatest of Catholic artists (e.g. Dante and Michelangelo) depicted some bishops as damned souls; and the greatest of Catholic saints (e.g. St. John Chrysostom) said that "the floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops."
38
posted on
08/24/2006 8:59:08 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life.)
To: muryan
A short historical perspective.
What contraception has wrought:
The first true test for contraception was in the Griswold v. Baird decision that made contraception legal 40 years ago. It was at that time that not only was contraception legal throughout the U. S., a whole new philosophy sprung up. The philosophy of "free sex" or what is called "Family Planning".
Under the guise of "Family Planning", it was not until the mid 1960s and 1970s that these philosophers really started to manifest themselves. What is coincidental and significant is that during that time moral degeneration, led by such happenings as Woodstock, Timothy Learys free drugs and many other things, the United States social mores started to decline to what we have today.
A question arose at the time: Did this same family planning and contraceptive society thinking cause the United States social mores to decline to todays lows or is it all just coincidence ? If it is coincidence then the following must be coincidental:
-As divorce is above 50% of all marriages, it was reported by Creighton Universitys Center for Marriage and Family, That the main causes for divorce are infidelity, and frequency of sexual relations were of greatest concern to those ages 29 and under.
-Other startling statistics show children of divorce are twice as likely to drop out of school as those from intact homes.
-Children of divorce (whose parents divorced while they were children) are 62% more likely than children of non-divorced parents to no longer identify with the faith of their parents when they grow up. Divorced adults quadrupled from 4.3 million in 1970 to 17.4 million in 1994."
Is it not strange that contraception runs parallel to the Country's moral decay?
A contraceptive society certainly takes away what is Gods and surely breaks the first commandment when man uses his own capacities to play God. It is why contraception will never work.
39
posted on
08/24/2006 9:10:34 AM PDT
by
franky
(Pray for the souls of the faithful departed.)
To: presidio9
Cathy Brothers, a spokeswoman for the centre, said it is a non-denominational agency
40
posted on
08/24/2006 9:58:38 AM PDT
by
kenth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson